So the mental illness angle for mass shooters is dead now?
So the mental illness angle for mass shooters is dead now?
They were aching to blame that one on trans too. The Samantha Hyde meme is roughly 9 years old.
It's trans terrorism atm
Colorado Springs shooter doesn't look too non-binary tbh.
Seems more like one of y'all after he was caught calling people niggers and beaners on a flight. Didn't bother to look up the rest after your first guy didn't check out.
Other first world, economically developed countries don’t have the issue we do but they also have social media, mental illness, and wokeness. Difference is people here who are having a bad day can find guns extremely easily
uvalde cops didnt engage because they assumed the first one through the door was dead, if they engaged in a hallway they would have been as "brave" as the nashville cops
Never said they were brave, just not gots like all the ones in Uvalde.
please don't misgender that fat sack o crap cleary it's got boobs and a so maybe it's confused.
Tranny, who was on birth control and the morning after pill.
Clearly the crazy society causing this particular incident is a well established trend in large shoot ups so we will divert from the weapons.
She drove a car and owned a knife, weapons solved. Damn this is going well.
Im here to work with you snaked.
Last edited by pgardn; 03-27-2023 at 11:11 PM.
i said they'd have been as "brave" in quotation marks because I wasn't saying they were either, just a tooled out gang with guns in a hallway
I think TSA has a point.... Not particularly well fleshed out but a point nonetheless. We've had easy access to guns for generations. Yeah it seems to be a recent development that we are now seeing rampant mass shooting events. There is another cause at work here besides ease of weapon access. That is a problem that needs to be solved but it's not the only one. What is providing the spark to Disturbed minds that acting out in a deadly manner is an actual option to be considered?
There is a driver here. Some opine that it's social media, an expanded exposure to violence as a game or a hobby, mental illness, or some sickening combination of the above and other factors I'm not bright enough to determine. But it's not just access and it's not just right wing /left wing/trans wing.. Ithink it's deeper than that.
Last edited by TeyshaBlue; 03-27-2023 at 11:15 PM.
Definitely % leaning males.
%s leaning white males.
Cultural trends in gun fascination up?
My dad lived in the country and they had guns for meals.
But he had zero fascination with collecting and now not even owning.
It was a simple deadly tool that got animals at distance.
That’s all fine and dandy. If the access is a problem now let’s address it. And putting aside mass murder events, we have a homicide problem generally as well (mostly done with handguns). One that isn’t really seen in other developed nations.
it’s like saying we shouldn’t address drunk driving by banning it because we’ve had alcohol access for a long time before cars
I think you're probably right that the problem is deeper than just guns, but we haven't had easy access for generations to the"battle guns" that cowed 375 LEs in Uvalde. And while there's no ideological monopoly on mass killings and politcal violence, the trend of the last 15 years or so leans heavily right wing, and not by any accident. The right wing has identified internal enemies and teases violence against them. The novel emphasis of the 2nd Amendment as an individual, unabridgeable right doesn't seem like serendipity either.
Gays and trans are being stridently declaimed as perverters of youth, and liberals as destroyers of the country, because red assed conservatives don't get a heckler's veto on social change. So they're turning to violence, with a wink and a nod from mainstream national Republicans.
Permission has been given by one major political party.
This is all true but totally skips past identifying the kernel that keeps germinating in the disturbed minds of the perpetrators. I think the raw sewage of "muh 2nd amendment" certainly lends itself to fertilizing this kernel of rationalizing violent response but I don't think it's the actual source. I think it's much much deeper and probably extraordinarily disturbing.
Not sure what you mean, but I'm intrigued. Can you hazard a guess at what the deeper layer is?
I really can't and that's very frustrating. This feeling is more of a hunch/fear than any conclusion driven by data.
you don't have to back it up with anything, just describe the hunch, if you can.
I'm working on that. It literally keeps me up at night. Sorry amigo. Just trying to find the words.
“how much hormones”
I know she does it on purpose but it’s still funny.
She would know about the rage from testosterone and the ill effects of two eyes so close they act as one.
Dude has no depth in her vision.
Do you agree with these statements or are you just trying to impress your friends on TexAgs?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)