Reply With Quote
Come on RG. That's BS that these certain leaders literally bragged bout murdering people.
If congress has evidence of Biden taking bribes, they should immediately begin impeachment proceedings. I look forward to the hearings and subsequent trial. I'm sure they'll be vastly entertaining.
Come on RG. That's BS that these certain leaders literally bragged bout murdering people.
Welcome.
I'm not saying what you think I'm saying.
I predict that Biden will actually pardon Trump.
America already feels compassion for him seeing him falling down and stumble over 3 syllable words, pretty regularly. Biden is hard to dislike because we all have or have had a struggling geezer in our own families with the exact same struggles. You pardon Trump and you turn the conservative narrative of weaponizing the DOJ on it's head and you ultimately win big in 2024.
Democrats do this well; create a mess and then convince you that they are solution to the mess.
That's fine. We welcome new peeps.
This is interesting.
But lol at the blue team creating a mess when the red team is an absolute dumpster fire.
Accusing each other of voter fraud… it’s gotten totally ridiculous for a bunch of red/orange knuckleheads.
he is not a “new peep” Stanislaw.
she is being watched…
as soon as she starts playing games, the DOJ will file an appeal to have her recused
tonite, trump made another confession…
he said he was too busy to obey the subpoena
and again
the presidential records act which is irrelevant to this criminal case
Biden should pardon him the day after the election tbh
Petraeus pled guilty to a charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified information. It was a misdemeanor because it was indeed a plea deal, which also means he collaborated with the government.
I think you get the picture on what's different about this particular case.
Democrats didn't create this mess. Big loser had ample opportunity to turn over the classified docs.
lol you rube. this guy is lying to you. DoJ didn't ask for any conditions or bail or anything else. And no liberals are upset about it.
False equivalency
A go to for the red sleaze.
Todays fun fact: loser Trump has now been INDICTED more times than he was ever ELECTED!
The man once described as "a heat seeking missile for Trump's ass" throws Trump under the bus.
Mikey self-immolating to get single-digits in the primary.
Christie, Pompeo -- who's the next suicide bomber? I think the field is waiting for DeSantis to man up. Good luck.
Going to laugh my ass of if Bill's case is what gets Trump off.
Trump’s Boxes and Clinton’s Sock Drawer
A president chooses what records to return or keep and the National Archives can’t do anything about it.
Although the indictment against Donald Trump doesn’t cite the Presidential Records Act, the charges are predicated on the law. The indictment came about only because the government thought Mr. Trump took records that didn’t belong to him, and the government raided his house to find any such records.
This should never have happened. The Presidential Records Act allows the president to decide what records to return and what records to keep at the end of his presidency. And the National Archives and Records Administration can’t do anything about it. I know because I’m the lawyer who lost the “Clinton sock drawer” case.
In 2009, historian Taylor Branch published “The Clinton Tapes: Wrestling History With the President.” The book is based on recordings of Mr. Branch’s 79 meetings with Bill Clinton between Jan. 20, 1993, and Jan. 20, 2001. According to Mr. Branch, the audiotapes preserved not only Mr. Clinton’s thoughts on issues he faced while president, but also some actual events, such as phone conversations. Among them:
• Mr. Clinton calling several U.S. senators and trying to persuade them to vote against an amendment by Sen. John McCain requiring the immediate withdrawal of troops from Somalia
• Mr. Clinton’s side of a phone call with Rep. William Natcher (D., Ky.) in which the president explained that his reasoning for joining the North American Free Trade Agreement was based on technical forecasts in his presidential briefings.
• Mr. Clinton’s side of a phone conversation with Secretary of State Warren Christopher about a diplomatic impasse over Bosnia.
• Mr. Clinton seeking advice from Mr. Branch on pending foreign-policy decisions such as military involvement in Haiti and possibly easing the embargo of Cuba.
The White House made the audiotapes. Nancy Hernreich, then director of Oval Office operations, set up the meetings between Messrs. Clinton and Branch and was involved in the logistics of the recordings. Did that make them presidential records?
The National Archives and Records Administration was never given the recordings. As Mr. Branch tells it, Mr. Clinton hid them in his sock drawer to keep them away from the public and took them with him when he left office.
My organization, Judicial Watch, sent a Freedom of Information Act request to NARA for the audiotapes. The agency responded that the tapes were Mr. Clinton’s personal records and therefore not subject to the Presidential Records Act or the Freedom of Information Act.
We sued in federal court and asked the judge to declare the audiotapes to be presidential records and, because they weren’t currently in NARA’s possession, compel the government to get them.
In defending NARA, the Justice Department argued that NARA doesn’t have “a duty to engage in a never-ending search for potential presidential records” that weren’t provided to NARA by the president at the end of his term. Nor, the department asserted, does the Presidential Records Act require NARA to appropriate potential presidential records forcibly. The government’s position was that Congress had decided that the president and the president alone decides what is a presidential record and what isn’t. He may take with him whatever records he chooses at the end of his term.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson agreed: “Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office,” she held, “it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records.”
Judge Jackson added that “the PRA contains no provision obligating or even permitting the Archivist to assume control over records that the President ‘categorized’ and ‘filed separately’ as personal records. At the conclusion of the President’s term, the Archivist only ‘assumes responsibility for the Presidential records.’ . . . PRA does not confer any mandatory or even discretionary authority on the Archivist to classify records. Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President.”
I lost because Judge Jackson concluded the government’s hands were tied. Mr. Clinton took the tapes, and no one could do anything about it.
The same is true with Mr. Trump. Although he didn’t keep records in his sock drawer, he gathered newspapers, press clippings, letters, notes, cards, photographs, do ents and other materials in cardboard boxes. Then Mr. Trump, like Mr. Clinton, took those boxes with him when he left office. As of noon on Jan. 20, 2021, whatever remained at the White House was presidential records. Whatever was taken by Mr. Trump wasn’t. That was the position of the Justice Department in 2010 and the ruling by Judge Jackson in 2012.
A decade later, the government should never have gone searching for potential presidential records. Nor should it have forcibly taken records from Mr. Trump. The government should lose U.S. v. Trump. If the courts decide otherwise, I want those Clinton tapes.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton...hare_permalink
Nuclear secrets and invasion plans are personal records now.
You're getting desperate.
the guy you are still defending- attempted a coup and sent his treasonous thugs to attack congress, why are you defending him?
do you agree with coups against the usa?
Cuba is pretty cool tbh
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
