Reply With Quote
You were trying to big time him and still are -- only your currency is ST perception.
We can see that plainly.
im here because i have a slow work day and its fun watching people themselves. same reason i go back and forth with you is the same reason i used to do the same with spurtacular
i dont think i regularly big-time tbh. ive never said something like "im a lawyer, you're not, and therefore my opinion here is correct." at least not that i can recall. nor have i flaunted my irrelevant lsat scores from a decade ago as some form of authority. my career is a matter of fact. your insistence that it is fake (like you have recently done with your own story of showing a therapist these threads lol) is amusing to me
You were trying to big time him and still are -- only your currency is ST perception.
We can see that plainly.
what do mutually exclusive mean. you suck at deductions.
And again you missed the point and tried to prove you were really a lawyer as if that had to do with anything in this discussion. As if that was not also on your mind.
You belie yourself, Crayola.
Given how you have been ranting about controlling the narrative already today this is hilarious.
You constantly accuse him of not being a lawyer explicitly and implicitly. That is definitely one of your points.what do mutually exclusive mean. you suck at deductions.
And again you missed the point and tried to prove you were really a lawyer as if that had to do with anything in this discussion. As if that was not also on your mind.
You belie yourself, Crayola.
Everything with you is so black and white. Spectrum much?
I am comfortable with uncertainty. You are not is all I see here.
You're the guy who shows ST posts to his therapists over decades.
Before you were the "I'm smart too" thesaurus guy.
You're pissed that it isn't really ambiguous. You want to preserve your narrative so now you'll say the screenshots are fake.
I'm the guy who made that shtick.
If you want to live your life thinking message board claims are unambiguous you go on with your bad self.
Actually Pavlov, the actual doctor, did. I used it because I knew you would understand it precisely because you had used it before. Bravo for picking up on it.I'm the guy who made that shtick.
I know he wouldn't waste the time making it up for you. You just aren't that important.
He didn't use it as a message board shtick, genius. You really are fighting for a W.Actually Pavlov, the actual doctor, did. I used it because I knew you would understand it precisely because you had used it before. Bravo for picking up on it.
Aww. I hope this doesn't affect our friendship.
Snarling as such doesn't have the impact you hope, peanut.
And wow you have to be besides yourself self editing like that.
I think you need to calm down. I'll be back later.
derp with a thesaurus and a therapist
If all other ad hominem fails just say "you suck" and e-victory is yours. Just like Socrates did it.
you still haven't read the indictment
He failed the bar exam and gave up. ie: not a lawyer
What's you proof?He failed the bar exam and gave up. ie: not a lawyer
derp with a thesaurus and a therapist
You flailing around ain't victory. You going to a therapist and showing them your activity would be a start but we both know you don't have the balls to do that.
You flailing around ain't victory. You going to a therapist and showing them your activity would be a start but we both know you don't have the balls to do that.
You can't even stick with your own narrative.
Quote me where I stated my goal was 'victory' and then quote me claiming it.
You can't even stick with your own narrative.
And you cannot even address the idea of you going to see a therapist about your online behavior.
That's not how this works.
You regretted saying you did; now you claim it was a lie you made up to troll meanies.And you cannot even address the idea of you going to see a therapist about your online behavior.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
