Reply With Quote
Wouldn't hate it at all.
I know a certain Body around here thinks he's got a some game he doesn't enjoy, like Sochan, but I think this team needs it.
Especially now.
agree with going after reeves to much of a playmaker not to and even if lakers match they will be tapped out and I'm all for that too. plus spurs can always rent the cap space for a year to a desperate team maybe miami. if a vet big is really needed someone on the cheap end like harrell would be a good sign. roster spots are already close to limited so i would be careful about who stays and who goes from here on out.
Wouldn't hate it at all.
I know a certain Body around here thinks he's got a some game he doesn't enjoy, like Sochan, but I think this team needs it.
Especially now.
What do we think the Vassell extension comes in at, and will the be able to front load it like Keldon?
I don't get the Zollins is injury prone talk. He had the issue with his ankle, that's long been handled. Other than that he didn't have any big health issues since.
Would be foolish of us not to try not to sign reeves...Dude is young and is only going to improve..Think he plays well along wemby as well.He brings energy the way manu did with his playstyle.. Give him 4 year 100 million is what would tempt him imo...and just see if lakers match
$25 million a year for a player you don't even know will fit? Who had one good season for a very particular team?
Wemby is gonna play at least the minimum games needed to win Rookie of the year. Plus he doesn’t want to miss a lot of games.
Thats how it goes usually for a young star....I know you saw what he did in the playoffs...This is a chance at getting ourselves another star with wemby
Which one is the young star?
I probably wouldn’t go for 100 but I think 70 just to F with the Lakers is worth it and I think someone else will go even higher. The more interested parties the better and the Lakers will be forced to match or go back to being a maybe-playin team.
What about Reeves would make you think he wouldn't fit. Everything about his game should easily translate to any team. 20 mil a year is probably his fair value but as a rfa wed have to overpay.
Reeves will fit any team. He can play on and off the ball. Good shooter and defender. Plays both guard positions. The question is more about cost.
He's had one good year playing off LeBron James and Anthony Davis and most of the e in his production comes from a big jump in his 3pt shooting. This is the sort of thing where Miami pays Duncan Robinson a huge salary and then immediately regrets it when his shooting falls off. Other than his shooting he's a decent piece but not worth $25 million.
Overpaying for shooting is a major trap in this league. See also Davis Bertans.
I think Reaves is a good player, but do we really want to blow our cap on him? I don’t think so personally
Not sure how much you watched but for a lot of the playoffs he was the best creator on the Lakers. Comparing him to bertans or Robinson is incredibly off the mark.
If he was a true point guard, you would as we have a bunch of 2s.
He’s not a star, he’s a typical overhyped Laker youth. He was like their 4th option, and likely unguarded or lightly guarded most of the time.
In the words of Public Enemy…don’t believe the hype. Almost every unknown discovery Laker young player that goes elsewhere tanks.
I'm not sure if you just scanned what I wrote or what. Maybe read it again.
Because of the poison pill Reaves at 100 mil a year would be making 38 mil in year 3. Completely crippling our cap flexibility. I think he would be a good fit but the worst case scenario is just catastrophic. You factor in the lebron effect, half season sample size and the older prospects plateau around his age.
I think that's only for the Lakers, assuming they match. Other teams would get him at a balanced contract of 25/year. CBA is whack.
Did they changed it? Asik and Jeremy Lin poison pill carried over to the Rockets.
They must've. It has something to do with the Arenas Provision.
Reeves is a terrific combo guard, something the Spurs need.
He showed he worked well off a big man in Davis, plays damn good down the stretches of big games.
hes young, matches the timeline and the contract ages well. Blake Wesley loses time? Only if he doesn't play well when give the opportunity .. the only one it would effect is Tre Jones down the line and if Wesley and Reeves out play him it makes him expendable anyways.
It's time to stop farting around with BS and upgrade the damn team. Reeves does that.
You either spend it now, or lose it after Vassell and Collins get their extensions.
This fallacy that there's a super star just waiting for us in a year or two is just that.
Yeah that is the poison pill. You can't offer more than MLE in his first 2 years. His third year is 38 mil.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
