Reply With Quote
Nah, you didn't.
What do you say really happened to WTC7 and why?
It's been over 20 years. Step up for once.
Sure we did. We have proven using peer review, actual modeling not the weak NISt model, and the scientific method that fire did not bring down WTC. That is very significant.Your entire legacy depends on proving a negative.
Sorry, that's not how anything works in real life.
You believe something else happened.
What happened?
You have to present an alternative conspiracy theory that is actually plausible and possible.
This is your final and complete failure, dan -- you can't even think of how anything else could have happened.
You had 20 years, You did nothing.
Nah, you didn't.
What do you say really happened to WTC7 and why?
It's been over 20 years. Step up for once.
There needs to be an investigation to find out what really happened. All we know right now, is that the NIST model was wrong.
No, no, no -- that's not good enough, dan.
After 20 years, you need an alternative narrative about how and why WTC7 came down.
Something possible and plausible.
What is your narrative?
idk but lets see what we do know........if WTC7 was not brought down by fire as proven....then there was a larger conspiracy than the current narrative
Then you're done here. See you in 20 years.
no conspiracy is bullproof....you know that Chuck....this is starting to unravel after only 22 years. They have kept the fact that we have made alien contact secret since the 40s
It's not. You nuts have not given anyone anything else in which to believe. You don't even think anything other than the generally accepted narrative is possible or plausible -- otherwise you would have presented an alternative narrative. All you have is your ego which cannot accept your abject failure here.
You were wrong. TSA was a big boy and admitted it in one instance. You probably will never be that self-aware.
you live in a s of your own maklng...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinio...iracy_theoriesA poll taken by WorldPublicOpinion.org, a collaborative project of research centers in various countries managed by the Program on International Policy At udes at the University of Maryland, College Park, polled 16,063 people in 17 nations outside of the United States during the summer of 2008. They found that majorities in only 9 of the 17 countries believe al-Qaeda carried out the attacks.
Public opinion sure seems to be with me
Great. Do any of them have a possible and plausible alternative narrative?
Is there even one alternative narrative after 22 years?
Post a link to it.
Give it up......you lostThe third major Zogby poll regarding 9/11 was conducted in August 2007. It was a telephone interview with a target of 1,000 interviews with randomly selected adults from across the United States, consisting of 71 questions, with a 3.1 percent margin of error.[6]
The results of the 2007 August poll indicate that 51 percent of Americans want the United States Congress to probe President George W. Bush and Vice President Cheney regarding the 9/11 attacks and over 30 percent of those polled seek immediate impeachment. While only 32 percent seek immediate impeachment of Bush and/or Cheney based on their personal knowledge, many citizens appear eager for clear exposure of the facts.
In addition, the poll also found that two-thirds (67 percent) of Americans say the 9/11 Commission should have investigated the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. Only 4.8 percent of the respondents agreed that members of the U.S. government "actively planned or assisted some aspects of the attack."
you where wrong.... now be a man and admit it
I don't see an alternative narrative in there.
Is there really nothing?
You completely lack the imagination and knowledge to formulate an alternative narrative after two decades?
reaching......i don't need an alternative.I don't see an alternative narrative in there.
Is there really nothing?
You completely lack the imagination and knowledge to formulate an alternative narrative after two decades?
After 20 years, you absolutely do. If there is no alternative, there is only the official narrative.
This is why you lost.
you don't get it....I didn't lose...we all lost....we all bought into a bogus story created by those who likely perpetuated the crime
chuck won't bother to read it but you can....
A structural reevaluation of WTC7
https://www.metabunk.org/attachments...019-pdf.40025/
Nah, You lost because you can't even tell me a narrative you believe after 20 years.
What is their possible and plausible alternative narrative about how WTC7 fell?
And who is Chuck?
yada yada yada.....nothing to see here folks...move along
Yeah, there really isn't anything to see since you have nothing after 20 years.
yada yada yada.....nothing to see here folks...move along
WTC7 analysis video...
Do they say what they think really happened to WTC7?
Is the bolded a joke?
Contact with an alien what? Contact? Like we communicated or we saw something alive from a place other than the earth? If this is not a joke id love to see the report.
A craft or lights we cannot id does not mean we have made alien contact. If you are saying we encountered something we cannot yet explain and call that “alien” that’s very different.
No, and they never will. But, that's okay, because (they) say so.
Jesus… I read the rest…
There is a huge step in going from, “not a fire” to “someone else brought it down”
Wow…
The Professors research does not go into anything else other than...did WTC7 collapse because of fire.....and the answer is absolutely, unequivocable NO...
....but he did use models to re-create what it would have taken for the building to collapse in the way that they did, and that would have required a much more involved conspiracy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions