IDGAF about Floyd bro. I'm just glad he's dead! him and other criminals like him that losers like you prop up and make excuses for. You're nothing but a male bro.![]()
i didnt make any assumptions. i just wanted to establish that you agree that people should not be allowed to murder others for fentanyl uses. thats good
now my next question is, of the two autopsies performed on floyd, one by the county and one independent one commissiond by the family, did either disagree that the cause of death was homicide, even if they noted that drug/fentanyl use increased the likelihood of death? this is also a simple yes or no question that shouldnt require a long winded, angry response
IDGAF about Floyd bro. I'm just glad he's dead! him and other criminals like him that losers like you prop up and make excuses for. You're nothing but a male bro.![]()
Ok ok you win. Jeez don’t go all menopause on us when you are now regretting your calf tats. It’s ok, you want people you don’t like to die based on your own moral standards. You like people who had drugs in their system to die and it makes you happy. You made your point. Thank god you are a nobody who can’t do anything.
not answering the question
i havent made a single excuse for him. as a criminal, he should have been arrested, charged, and sentenced based on the crimes he committed. i dont think he was a particularly good person based on details of his past that are public. i dont think he's a role model
but my question wasnt if floyd was a good person or not. my question wasnt if you are glad he's dead. or if you want criminals off the street.
my question was, of the two autopsies performed on floyd, one by the county and one independent one commissioned by the family, did either disagree that the cause of death was homicide, even if they noted that drug/fentanyl use increased the likelihood of death?
LOL "now regretting your calf tats" bro I love all my tattoos. You and the other weak males here are all the same putos tbh.
Cry more about you just like you did in your original post dip .
Yeah, no, you're full of and you know it lawyer.
You're not a genuine person whatsoever and IDGAF about people like you or what they ask of me. Go yourself SR.
all ive done in this thread is ask you 2 questions
1. if we should be allowed to murder fentanyl users
2. if either of the autopies performed on floyd disagreed that the cause of death was homicide
you've responded to my posts 11 times in this thread and only eventually answered question 1, saying "no"
i havent really done anything here that could be characterized as being "full of " or "not a genuine person". i've just asked you two questions. the only affirmative claim i've made is that crowder's video was dumb
You can keep claiming as such but you're not genuine in the least.
Why even ask the first question at all? Why'd you feel compelled to do so? It makes no sense to ask that question. You have alternative motives while trying to create a narrative that doesn't exist.
Go play your bull games elsewhere bro.![]()
would you have preferred it if a flipped the order of the questions?
1. did either autopsy disagree that floyd's death was caused by homicide
2. is it ok to murder fentanyl users
same end result
those are the only 2 points that matter imo, and i figured the question about whether it should be ok to murder fentanyl users should have been a very easy point to get past and reach an agreement on. i didnt think it would require 7 different responses from you before you finally gave a yes or no to it.
you've now responded 5 times to the autopsy question without answering it.
why are you trying to debate joey. that seems pretty futile. sort of like trying to convince the chimpanzee at the zoo that it’s pointless to fling feces at the glass. it’s not like it’s going to have some epiphany and realize the error of its ways. it’s a chimpanzee.
Doesn't matter in the least because again you're not a genuine person. I've dealt with you long enough to have realized that many months/years ago SR.
I gave you an answer to your stupid question from the get go but you being a simpleton, like Chump, you demand a "yes" or a "no" because simple explanations aren't simple enough for you to grasp. Call in your paralegal bro because you're lost!
Now go play your games with your buds here because I ain't one of them bro.
ive asked him two questions. he knows the answer to both (he already answered one of them!).
i give people the benefit of the doubt. i think he has it in him to answer the second question. he already knows the answer too.
You're as dumb as SR is it seems.
none of these responses to me answered whether it should be legal to murder fentanyl users or not. if i'm mistaken, please point out which response made your position on that clear
this is the first time you actually answered it
glad we agree
now, did either of the two autopsy reports, one done by county examiners, and one independently commissioned by his family, disagree that the cause of death was homicide?
My response is going to be the same... GLAD FLOYD IS DEAD!
I hope more life long criminals die too by OD'ing or not.![]()
neither question made any assumptions.
if i asked it this way "was it ok for chauvin to murder floyd?"... then yes, that question would assume that chauvin murdered floyd.
but i never asked that. i just asked if it is ok to murder fentanyl users. there is no assumption there.
i then asked if either of the two autopsies disagreed that the cause of death was homicide. the only assumptions in that question are that there were two autopsies that provided a cause of death
this isnt a response though
im asking about what the autopsy results were, not whether you are glad or what you hope happens
Doesn't matter. You're not a genuine person and thus dealing with you is like playing with fire.![]()
why do you waste your time pulling a ChumpDumper with this dumb ? you already know he's on an ever-shifting ground of beliefs depending on the situation and constantly contradicts himself. the entire forum knows he's a complete toolwhy waste so much time going back and forth with someone so disingenuous
answering straightforward, non-loaded questions is playing with fire
that just means you dont even believe your own , or you're just lying about what you think.
slow work day, spending most of it prepping for a depo tomorrow
oddly enough, this isnt the worst practice![]()
Ahhh, target practice. makes sense![]()
wasnt the intention, but happy by-product i guess
Your first question was asinine so why even give a to answer your second question? You see how that works? Keep proving just how questionable you are bud.
LOL With that last line of yours acting like I'm hiding something just because you're an asshat.![]()
you're hiding because you are refusing to answer questions about what you think
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)