1. #32576
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313

  2. #32577
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Very important video:



    Ray Mcgovern and Larry Johnson believe Biden and co might be compelled to use tactical nukes.

    - because Ukraine is losing badly
    - because Biden Crime family might be in trouble
    - because theres nothing else left in our stocks.
    - because NATO would lose in a conventional war vs Russia



    s getting real



    And they say once it escalates to hot nuke exchange, Russia would "survive" this war as well.

    This is because Russia does some some nuclear defenses and could intercept most american nukes. US has nothing. So we would be erased.



    And here I am sitting minutes from the white house right now
    Russia can't even win this conventional war against Ukraine yet.

  3. #32578
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    91,195
    Very important video:



    Ray Mcgovern and Larry Johnson believe Biden and co might be compelled to use tactical nukes.

    - because Ukraine is losing badly
    - because Biden Crime family might be in trouble
    - because theres nothing else left in our stocks.
    - because NATO would lose in a conventional war vs Russia



    s getting real



    And they say once it escalates to hot nuke exchange, Russia would "survive" this war as well.

    This is because Russia does some some nuclear defenses and could intercept most american nukes. US has nothing. So we would be erased.



    And here I am sitting minutes from the white house right now
    No way. There is nary upside for the U.S. to go first. Nary. Only way U.S. goes nuclear is if Putin sends one toward us. Otherwise, the Nazi's in Ukraine are on their own at nuclear.

  4. #32579
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    91,195
    Russia can't even win this conventional war against Ukraine yet.
    Because the silly SOB Putin is fighting it Vietnam style. Just have to pray he wakes up and gleans the codes.

  5. #32580
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    91,195

















    "NEVER SURRENDER!"






  6. #32581
    Veteran velik_m's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    9,153
    Russia’s African coup strategy

    Today we are sharing a report from the Microsoft Threat Analysis Center (MTAC) on Russian influence operations in Africa, principally focused on the Niger coup. We believe it is vital there is wider understanding of the ways in which the internet is being used to stoke political instability around the world.

    Recent weeks have seen a spate of military coups in French-speaking African countries – including Mali, Guinea, Burkina Faso, Niger, and Gabon – which have led to global concerns about a spiraling crisis of governance in the region.

    The report observes:

    * The Niger coup leaders violently suppressed initial protests in the capital Niamey, imposed a curfew, and closed the borders. Counter-protests, supporting the coup and brandishing Russian flags, quickly followed using claims that France was seeking to restore the previous government to power and demands that France depart from the Sahel region of Africa.

    * MTAC has identified several Nigerien civil society groups involved in these events. Two stand out for their unusually pro-Russian stance – PARADE Niger and the Union of Pan-African Patriots. The first appears to be a construct of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs with little genuine local support while the second is a political vehicle for a single politician. These groups have defended the coup, called for greater cooperation with Russia and helped coordinate and amplify offline protest. They have also engaged in multiple examples of inauthentic online behavior to artificially promote content.

    ...
    https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-i...coup-strategy/

  7. #32582
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    Hater


  8. #32583
    Veteran velik_m's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    9,153



  9. #32584
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313

  10. #32585
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    No way. There is nary upside for the U.S. to go first. Nary. Only way U.S. goes nuclear is if Putin sends one toward us. Otherwise, the Nazi's in Ukraine are on their own at nuclear.
    There was no upside of going to Vietnam, Afghanistan, Syria. Yet we still go.

    Sorry but the lunatics in the white house already have crossed many lines depleted Uranium, cluster bombs, F16s, last step is direct intervention, then nukes

  11. #32586
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105

  12. #32587
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    Where to begin with all the hater flip-flopping and batting 0.000 ITT

    Who said Russia would survive?

    Nobody will survive a nuclear exchange. A hot war between NATO and Russia makes a nuclear exchange a real possibility. Its silly to think otherwise.

    Putin already said if one inch of russia is attacked. The nukes are flying.
    Lavrov is right

    Russia never threatened with nukes.

    Otherwise, post the quote....
    No mention of using nukes.

    Nice try not
    Im laughing at your stupidity that Russia will nuke Ukraine because they received a handful of Advanced Artillery


    If Russia loses Kherson in next few days Im rooting for negotiation and a Russian Surrender.


    But if West does not want to negotiate the nukes will fly nig.

    Guaransheed
    There was no upside of going to Vietnam, Afghanistan, Syria. Yet we still go.

    Sorry but the lunatics in the white house already have crossed many lines depleted Uranium, cluster bombs, F16s, last step is direct intervention, then nukes
    Very important video:



    Ray Mcgovern and Larry Johnson believe Biden and co might be compelled to use tactical nukes.

    - because Ukraine is losing badly
    - because Biden Crime family might be in trouble
    - because theres nothing else left in our stocks.
    - because NATO would lose in a conventional war vs Russia



    s getting real



    And they say once it escalates to hot nuke exchange, Russia would "survive" this war as well.

    This is because Russia does some some nuclear defenses and could intercept most american nukes. US has nothing. So we would be erased.



    And here I am sitting minutes from the white house right now


    C'est la vie

  13. #32588
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    Where to begin with all the hater flip-flopping and batting 0.000 ITT

















    C'est la vie
    Um nothing there is wrong jiglet

    If millions of Russian citizens are in danger like if Crimea was about to b3 stormed. Nukes would fly.

    Its written in the Russian cons ution.

    Just like US would nuke if Florida was about to get stormed.

  14. #32589
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    Um nothing there is wrong jiglet

    If millions of Russian citizens are in danger like if Crimea was about to b3 stormed. Nukes would fly.

    Its written in the Russian cons ution.

    Just like US would nuke if Florida was about to get stormed.
    Not even hole Colombia would want to storm hole Florida

  15. #32590
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411


    Signs that something is happening is some dude saying maybe it might possibly happen.

  16. #32591
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Um nothing there is wrong jiglet

    If millions of Russian citizens are in danger like if Crimea was about to b3 stormed. Nukes would fly.

    Its written in the Russian cons ution.

    Just like US would nuke if Florida was about to get stormed.
    Show the passage in the Russian cons ution saying this.

  17. #32592
    Believe. daboom1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Post Count
    8,022

  18. #32593
    Yam Tits's Bonespur Xray Ef-man's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    20,313
    Nobel Foundation withdraws invitation to Russia, Belarus and Iran to attend ceremonies

  19. #32594
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105


    But not realistic

    Lots of Cocaine missing

  20. #32595
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    Not even hole Colombia would want to storm hole Florida
    I love Florida.

    Got property there and one of the best states in US

    Cheers

  21. #32596
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    Show the passage in the Russian cons ution saying this.
    sure buddy

    In June 2020, Putin signed a decree—the Basic Principles of the Russian Federation’s State Policy in the Domain of Nuclear Deterrence—that specifies two conditions under which Russia would use nuclear weapons. The first is unsurprising: “The Russian Federation retains the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear weapons and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and/or its allies…” But that sentence ends with an unusual statement: “… and also in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is put under threat” [emphasis added].
    https://thebulletin.org/2022/03/read...on-use-policy/

    I hope I don't have to explain to even a dummy like you that losing Crimea would mean Russia loses the Black Sea. and losing the Black Sea would be the death of russia.

  22. #32597
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    91,195


    Signs that something is happening is some dude saying maybe it might possibly happen.
    Anything that'll get Russia to the Nuclear Option is Jake with me.

  23. #32598
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    91,195
    sure buddy



    https://thebulletin.org/2022/03/read...on-use-policy/

    I hope I don't have to explain to even a dummy like you that losing Crimea would mean Russia loses the Black Sea. and losing the Black Sea would be the death of russia.
    You know what happened here, don't ya, hater? Dumper ed around like Effy says, & Dumper found out. Will Dumps duly stipulate? No way.

  24. #32599
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    91,195


    But not realistic

    Lots of Cocaine missing
    hater, hittin' it Labor Weekend, '23.

    hater

  25. #32600
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    sure buddy



    https://thebulletin.org/2022/03/read...on-use-policy/

    I hope I don't have to explain to even a dummy like you that losing Crimea would mean Russia loses the Black Sea. and losing the Black Sea would be the death of russia.
    that's not the cons ution and that's not a requirement.

    And Russia has access to the Black Sea regardless of whether it is occupying Crimea -- just like it did before the invasion. Russia didn't die then.

    Three more Ls for hater.

    hater

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •