Special counsel David Weiss, if you lurk on ST:
You pulled every whataboutism in the book when it was Bush. "what about clinton"
Selective memory.
Special counsel David Weiss, if you lurk on ST:
Why are you always in my notifications? You know I'm not a child right? I'm not the age you go for when you victimize and prey on others. I can't wait until we can just slay you pedophiles in the streets,
lol "we"
Your weak ass isn't going to do .
link? put up or shut up.
Same goes for you ChumpDumper. ing degenerate losers!
that's rich, you usually refuse to give links when asked
"Come up here to my place of work where I keep a firearm and tell that to my face!"
Bruen could bollix conviction of the gun charge.
The business/taxes part is still pending:Another factor that could complicate the government’s case: Last year’s Supreme Court ruling that gave people a broad right to carry guns outside the home. Mr. Biden’s lawyers have argued that recent lawsuits challenging federal regulations, including the drug use restriction, could render a prosecution of Mr. Biden moot.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/06/u...n-charges.htmlThe status report by Mr. Weiss was filed at the request of a federal judge. It makes no mention of the status of likely separate charges stemming from the five-year investigation of Mr. Biden’s business dealings, and subsequent failure to pay taxes, conducted by Mr. Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware who was appointed last month as a special counsel after overseeing the investigation. Last month, prosecutors told the court they intended to file the tax charges in either California or Washington, D.C.
Eh, joey is a complex character; where does one begin?
But really, what did you expect from a pedo-defender who claims he hates pedos, who stalks men but coyly claims he is being stalked, has way too many unresolved family issues that ed him up, tells men that humiliate him that he loves them, doxxed himself but blames others, and tries to deflect by poorly projecting a tough image.
It's funny how you truly believe you're cool let alone cool here and that anyone here actually gives a about you. Thank God for the internet right? Without the internet you wouldn't even have fake anonymous friends you ing pathetic little .
him and his PEDO Peter dad.
And you know your post was bull and can't back it up. Just can't get over your butthurt.
Either way I don't see what difference it makes. You don't do that anymore.
Now that Teysha is gone it is basically you and the guy trying to pretend he is half a dozen Nazis on the conservative side.
another angry daydream. I have no idea what you're talking about, am I supposed to?
Please. You always act ignorant & the aforementioned butthurt when you're challenged. It's either the Ignore List for the offender (me), or, the coy approach you're using on CC now.
Ya turdhound, you.
We know today that the House GOP won't admit Devon Archer's testimony into the record, because it didn't go their way.
Their own witnesses keep blowing them up in public and they're temporizing with a bogus hearing to distract from a government shutdown they will have caused.
Do you think the House GOP has any credibility left on this? If so, why so?
If it bothers you, then I take it back.
You can be rather shamelessly hypocritical in your concerns. you give people with the magic R a pass way too often.
GOP wary of televising the hearing now
GOP ducks Hunter in public
Coward ass clowns![]()
it's the Crossfire Hurricane of Fast and Furiouses
Well, well, well. GOP got cucked using Yam ’ Legal Counsel!
Hunter Biden attorney Abbe Lowell sent a letter House Republicans on Friday arguing that subpoenas they sent the president’s son in November are legally invalid, because they were issued before the full House authorized an impeachment inquiry on December 13, 2023.
The letter cites a Yam- s era Office of Legal Counsel opinion that subpoenas issued before the House authorized inquiry in which the subpoenas are based are not enforceable.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)