Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905

  2. #2
    Veteran John B's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    12,402
    Agree. I thought they played much better tonight. They surely started real good, constantly moving and attacking the rim which gave them an early lead, but eventually abandoned when the opponent start running. They need to trust the system that got them the lead, being aggressive to the paint, transition offense. I think we got glimpses of what things they are capable at doing, but just need to be composed and trust the system

  3. #3
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    12,594
    Patience…

    Stay the course…

  4. #4
    Cinco TimmehC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    1,499
    Hopefully this means Branham shook off whatever nerves have been plaguing him. We could really use that extra punch off the bench.

  5. #5
    Work in Progress Fireball's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Post Count
    9,119
    it was in some way a solid game for the Spurs but Miami does not have the 3 point offense compared to the other teams that blew us out recently ... so I figured this would be a close game and Miami's defense during certain parts of the game made the difference.

  6. #6
    tv screen baseline bum sananspursfan21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    4,558
    I was caught up in the moment last night and was pretty angry. After a good night’s sleep and reading the grades, I feel better. They competed against a veteran playoff team with stellar defense. The blown leads are aggravating, inexperienced or not but hopefully they’re learning to keep their foot down on the neck when they get up like that. Their big leads look sustainable because they’re coming from swarming defense, hitting open looks and making the extra pass, not lucky bounces. It’s almost like once they realize it’s working, they stop and let the other guys catch up.

  7. #7
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    it was in some way a solid game for the Spurs but Miami does not have the 3 point offense compared to the other teams that blew us out recently ... so I figured this would be a close game and Miami's defense during certain parts of the game made the difference.
    That’s EXACTLY what I was thinking watching the game last night. We’re actually not a great matchup for them.

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    1,819
    I was caught up in the moment last night and was pretty angry. After a good night’s sleep and reading the grades, I feel better. They competed against a veteran playoff team with stellar defense. The blown leads are aggravating, inexperienced or not but hopefully they’re learning to keep their foot down on the neck when they get up like that. Their big leads look sustainable because they’re coming from swarming defense, hitting open looks and making the extra pass, not lucky bounces. It’s almost like once they realize it’s working, they stop and let the other guys catch up.
    It’s hard for me to feel good about it. Miami was missing Herro(23ppg) and Lowry(proven veteran). I won’t count Caleb Martin because he been out since game 1 but those are key guys. This team can definitely improve but it’s gonna take a long time.

  9. #9
    Like I said... tmtcsc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    7,148
    This would be a significantly better team if we had season vets who know how to play and win games. DRob and Tim had that but we've left Wemby on his own. As it is, Vegas will most likely be right on their projected win count. This team sucks except for Wemby. We have some decent pieces around him but lack talent to win now. Gonna be a long, loss laden season unfortunately. Kedlon would be a bench player on most other teams. He makes terrible decisions and can be a ball hog at times.

  10. #10
    R.C. Deez Nuts. Mugen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    23,765
    -#1 priority for the offseason is finding a lead guard that can put pressure on a defense. They sorely need a guy that can penetrate and kick just to make life easier for everybody.
    -With what Victor showed tonight, it's apparent that the offense should be running fully through him. Running a few sets where he can get it at the top of the arc where he can find cutters, run some screenNroll with Devin/Keldon as the screeners, etc. would be nice. It's a lot better than Jeremy having the ball for half the shot clock...
    -I want them to change the angle a bit on those Zollins/Wemby cross screen action under the basket. The end result if usually Wemby open for a lob but literally nobody on the team outside of Wemby/Tre can throw it

  11. #11
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    3,509
    Playing a power forward a point guard on purpose should get Pop an automatic F every game tbh

  12. #12
    Veteran rjv's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,201
    compared to zollins, bassey is clearly the better rebounder and a better defender but neither is a starting center in the NBA. it was nice to see a solid game from branham though; I hope he turns the corner.

  13. #13
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Not a great game, but a step in the right direction for sure.

  14. #14
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    compared to zollins, bassey is clearly the better rebounder and a better defender but neither is a starting center in the NBA. it was nice to see a solid game from branham though; I hope he turns the corner.
    Agree. Zach might be a better offensive spark plug off the bench. He is a good scorer but takes too many shots and gets eaten up by starting front lines.

  15. #15
    Veteran GB20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    2,978
    Thank you for the grade!!

  16. #16
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    Agree. Zach might be a better offensive spark plug off the bench. He is a good scorer but takes too many shots and gets eaten up by starting front lines.
    he would be a nice bench big in a 6th man Montrez Harrell on the Clippers's type of role on a contending team. We need defense at the 5 for the starting line up

  17. #17
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    he would be a nice bench big in a 6th man Montrez Harrell on the Clippers's type of role on a contending team. We need defense at the 5 for the starting line up
    I'd honestly go the other way around.
    How many bigs, even for rookie Wemby, are tough enough of a matchup for him to need an actual C in the starting lineup?

    Jokic and Embiid, who else? Not even AD with his lack of post play could bully him.
    Yeah, it requires more physical effort, but then on the other end all those slow-footed bigs like Valanciunas or even Sabonis would get torched because they're way too slow and useless to deal with Wemby's mobility.

    Having Wemby roam around on defense is nice and all, but having him match up against slow centers in a league where only a couple of them are legit superstars is game-breaking.

    Obviously, if we can get a legit C, by all means, but how many of those are in the league? Good rim protectors and rebounders can't really shoot, it's a rare skillset.
    And if we get someone who can't shoot, then the rest of the lineup needs a rework, can't have multiple bad shooters on the floor in today's league.

    Zach's story and recovery is great, but I'm kinda regretting that they gave him that contract. He'll never be good enough to be anything more than a backup for a legit playoff team with his horrible defense.
    I guess he'll be easy enough to move, but I really dislike that he's got a role of a legit all-star in this team.

    As others have said, most of the sets need to run through Wemby and Devin, others can get in line and show they're worth keeping in the long run.

    Actual triple threat point guard would immediately transform this team.

  18. #18
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    This nonsense again?

    They should definitely be looking to get to Wembanyama at C lineups more often (too much Collins going on), but the league is as loaded with bigs as it's ever been and the physical toll of the position is not just about defending post ups, it's: block outs, drives and being the primary in the p-n-r/screen setter offensively.

    Also, he'd still be defended by the exact same players who are defending him now because the Spurs offer plenty of hiding spots for led footed bigs.

  19. #19
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    I'd honestly go the other way around.
    How many bigs, even for rookie Wemby, are tough enough of a matchup for him to need an actual C in the starting lineup?

    Jokic and Embiid, who else? Not even AD with his lack of post play could bully him.
    Yeah, it requires more physical effort, but then on the other end all those slow-footed bigs like Valanciunas or even Sabonis would get torched because they're way too slow and useless to deal with Wemby's mobility.

    Having Wemby roam around on defense is nice and all, but having him match up against slow centers in a league where only a couple of them are legit superstars is game-breaking.

    Obviously, if we can get a legit C, by all means, but how many of those are in the league? Good rim protectors and rebounders can't really shoot, it's a rare skillset.
    And if we get someone who can't shoot, then the rest of the lineup needs a rework, can't have multiple bad shooters on the floor in today's league.

    Zach's story and recovery is great, but I'm kinda regretting that they gave him that contract. He'll never be good enough to be anything more than a backup for a legit playoff team with his horrible defense.
    I guess he'll be easy enough to move, but I really dislike that he's got a role of a legit all-star in this team.

    As others have said, most of the sets need to run through Wemby and Devin, others can get in line and show they're worth keeping in the long run.

    Actual triple threat point guard would immediately transform this team.
    They obviously don't want him to play Center full time though. And even if, you'd still want to have a match up advantage where you can beat small teams with 2 bigs and outrebound/outscore them in the paint. So a defensive big is neccessary. Obviously it would be great if that guy can also shoot 3s, but those are hard to find. If the Spurs find a real point guard, the C not being a shooter won't be a big issue.

  20. #20
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2023
    Post Count
    645
    Trying times but the team is making incremental progress. Wemby also has to be held accountable for his shot selection too, which at times is as infuriating as his teammates failing to find him in good spots.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •