*** Official Israel vs Hamas war #13783478343 thread ***

[koriwhat]

Hamas and burn in with your pedo prophet!

[ChumpDumper]

Ignorance to what?

Let's go back to where I see the devolution started.

Can you admit that your initial response to me in this thread where you wonder about Netanyahu's motives was innuendo that you led off with?

I thought his support of Hamas was common knowledge at this point and intended no innuendo.

Clearly you did not know it, so you took it as innuendo.

I said I will adjust my statements to allow for your ignorance and assumptions in the future -- and I will because you have established this is a big deal to you. I think it's OK that you don't know things and can be educated by other posters here without going to war with those posters. This is my point of view.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I thought his support of Hamas was common knowledge at this point and intended no innuendo.

Clearly you did not know it, so you took it as innuendo.

I said I will adjust my statements to allow for your ignorance and assumptions in the future -- and I will because you have established this is a big deal to you. I think it's OK that you don't know things and can be educated by other posters here without going to war with those posters. This is my point of view.

That is another argument you just left off. My response that the last time you said it was that the reason why the PLO/Hamas policy is what it is was both not new to me nor the state of Israel so your attribution was diluted at best.

But that is the whole thing about innuendos you leave what you mean unstated. Youre just wondering. Thing is it is not your stated premise you are desperately handwaving at. No, it is Netanyahu's motives for doing so you are wondering about. You even laid out a FAFO scenario for him where Hamas is the pouncing lion. Read like most of the ty stories around here.

[ChumpDumper]

That is another argument you just left off. My response that the last time you said it was that the reason why the PLO/Hamas policy is what it is was both not new to me nor the state of Israel so your attribution was diluted at best.

But that is the whole thing about innuendos you leave what you mean unstated. Youre just wondering. Thing is it is not your stated premise you are desperately handwaving at. No, it is Netanyahu's motives for doing so you are wondering about. You even laid out a FAFO scenario for him where Hamas is the pouncing lion. Read like most of the ty stories around here.

I knew everything all along!

OK DMC.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I knew everything all along!

OK DMC.

Okay so he was continuing the divide and conquer strategy. I thought you had a point in the broader conflict other than Netanyahu sucks which no one disagrees with.

Did you not understand what I meant by this original response from yesterday?

[ChumpDumper]

Did you not understand what I meant by this original response from yesterday?

Yes, you claimed you knew everything all along yesterday as well.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Yes, you claimed you knew everything all along yesterday as well.

I can admit that I did not know Netanyahu's specific policies but as I stated Israel's policy towards the two governments over palestine and the broader role of proxies is really old news.

I am still waiting for a point. You cannot do that though. You wrap them up in questions and innuendo. Then you say it is about me.

[ChumpDumper]

I can admit that I did not know Netanyahu's specific policies but as I stated Israel's policy towards the two governments over palestine and the broader role of proxies is really old news.

I am still waiting for a point. You cannot do that though. You wrap them up in questions and innuendo. Then you say it is about me.

I posted two articles spelling out what was my point and you said you already knew but didn't really know. Now you really, really know what my point was and you're still asking me what my point was.

I can only conclude U mad.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I posted two articles spelling out what was my point and you said you already knew but didn't really know. Now you really, really know what my point was and you're still asking me what my point was.

I can only conclude U mad.

you posted two articles that made your point for you.

[ChumpDumper]

you posted two articles that made your point for you.

Posting sources is quite common here.

And you claim you knew that point before and after I posted them.

What do you claim to not know now?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

And you claim you knew that point before and after I posted them.

What do you claim to not know now?

I'm still waiting for your point. Not the article's point and I already told you the point that I got from them.

I have to say you are the most passive aggressive person I have encountered hiding behind your questions, innuendo, and articles.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

he's probably finally reading the articles.

[ChumpDumper]

I'm still waiting for your point. Not the article's point and I already told you the point that I got from them.

I have to say you are the most passive aggressive person I have encountered hiding behind your questions, innuendo, and articles.

I have to say you are making no real sense and are just trying to insult me to save face just like DMC would do.

I have no idea why you are asking me what my point is when you insist you knew my point all along.

[hater]

[ChumpDumper]

he's probably finally reading the articles.

To whom are you talking?

Your followers?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I have to say you are making no real sense and are just trying to insult me to save face just like DMC would do.

I have no idea why you are asking me what my point is when you insist you knew my point all along.

And so here we are full circle. As I stated before, you led off with an innuendo and have not explained it very well so I was wondering if you were ever going to come around to a point. If you cannot come up with a point. Your inability to do so is not an insult from me to you. You just have no point.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

To whom are you talking?

Your followers?

Our audience.

[ChumpDumper]

And so here we are full circle. As I stated before, you led off with an innuendo and have not explained it very well so I was wondering if you were ever going to come around to a point. If you cannot come up with a point. Your inability to do so is not an insult from me to you. You just have no point.

As you stated before, you claimed you knew my point all along. Your inability to accept your own claim of knowing my point is not an insult from me to you. You just make no sense whatsoever.

[ChumpDumper]

Our audience.

No one is going to care to read more than a couple posts into this exchange.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

As you stated before, you claimed you knew my point all along. Your inability to accept your own claim of knowing my point is not an insult from me to you. You just make no sense whatsoever.

I tell you that I am waiting for you to make your point and then you respond with this.

At this point the only point you have made is that you knew something that I did not and your repe ive insistence on it. That is just sad.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

As you stated before, you claimed you knew my point all along. Your inability to accept your own claim of knowing my point is not an insult from me to you. You just make no sense whatsoever.

And wait a second. Before you said that you did not use an innuendo. Do you stand by that statement still?

[ChumpDumper]

I tell you that I am waiting for you to make your point and then you respond with this.

At this point the only point you have made is that you knew something that I did not and your repe ive insistence on it. That is just sad.

But you said you already knew my point about Netanyahu all along -- you can't retcon my point to make it about yourself now. That is just sad.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

But you said you already knew my point about Netanyahu all along -- you can't retcon my point to make it about yourself now. That is just sad.

What I said was, "so he continued with the divide in conquer strategy. Do you have a point other than Netanyahu sucks?"

Read my sig and think about it.

[ChumpDumper]

And wait a second. Before you said that you did not use an innuendo. Do you stand by that statement still?

I said it was not intended as innuendo because I figured his support for Hamas was common knowledge. You said you already had that knowledge all along -- so it really was common knowledge.

[ChumpDumper]

What I said was, "so he continued with the divide in conquer strategy. Do you have a point other than Netanyahu sucks?"

Yes, we were talking about Netanyahu, not you. So don't make it about yourself.

Read my sig and think about it.

I have sigs turned off and nothing you say is really worth turning them back on.