Reply With Quote
If two different people disagree with me in the same thread, I do not assume that a combination against me has been formed. I guess that's just me, though.
If two different people disagree with me in the same thread, I do not assume that a combination against me has been formed. I guess that's just me, though.
You are so full of your eyes are turnin' brown.
He didn't disagree with me. He didn't even know my argument until the next day. He only knew I was arguing with you, Dulcinea. I made that evident.
I like how you pretend to be in bored then cannot help but argue on merit. Undermines your portrayal completely.
You're wrong.
Nice conspiracy world building tho.
For example here is Chump clearly not understanding my argument while obsessing over the importance of his question and it's loaded presumptive premise:
You don't really have an argument.
You just defend any action Israel has taken and will ever take without a thought.
Then you spiral into your regular meltdown of conspiracy theories, persecution fantasies and ego soothing.
And you'll never get over others' pointing out that you're wrong.
Ever.
Muh grudge.
Not today, Chump. Merry Christmas.
you started it today, dumbass.
May you receive the gift of self-awareness.
I was responding to Wine who had addressed me. I have no interest in being your windmill today.
May you receive the gift of self-awareness.
Merry Christmas.
You were talking only about me, dumbass.
Yes, we were. They brought it up. What from that made you think I wanted to do the OCD runaround with you?
"OCD" in the le is pretty funny
At least ya's got a clean clock out of it. in' spotless.
Dumper meltdown
Probably this thread you dedicated to me tbh.
It was so all your attempts to derail could be brought to one place. It is working well. I like it.
For example this inane question:
It's 20k btw.
again you agree with me, dumbass
So it means nothing without context.
You have no point.
Well, my point is that there is no case for genocide. That has been my argument from the beginning. Yet you still have not caught up. At first because you were too lazy to read the argument that you were white knighting for. Now, I imagine it just you spinning in place as you are want to do.
So it means nothing without context.
You have no point.
These red herrings in the form of stupid questions are your favorite derailment method.
Everyone can see your support for Israel borders on the fanatical.
I'll just go with "ethnic cleansing" until your side decides on a final solution for them.
And yet I speak against the use of 2000 lbs bombs.
Spin in place some more, OCD boy.
You said it was "problematic" but did say they should stop using them.
I say something is a problem and that is not speaking against it.
You said it was "problematic" but did say they should stop using them.
Sorry my outrage is not sufficient.
It is fun watching you spin though. You are so fixated you cannot help yourself.
Not really. You absolutely did not say they should stop.
You have zero outrage for what Israel does or has ever done.
You're a stan. It's fine, just own it.
It's fun watching you play the apologist then get offended when you're called an apologist.
You can't help yourself.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions