Reply With Quote
what a fancy way of admitting you're wrong
weird, off the wall voice-throwing and mind reading are two of your prominent tics.
asked and answered, boredom and idleness.I acknowledge your point of fact.
You said that I reminded you of something annoying your bandmate does. I am sure it was a state of zen.
It was a forest for the trees argument. You never ever seem to get those.
hey, Fuzzy, a topical conversation is threatening to break out in the GAZA thread, or do you prefer posting here?
Fair enough. I think it strange how you guys think stoicism is virtue but no point in arguing.
No, you were just wrong and you couldn't just say it plainly.
your ego is huge and fragile
sorry, where do you get that?
Might have something to do with his new "U mad -- sometimes I mad" posts.
I am not going to point fingers but rather say that everyone claims zen indifference.
I didn't. I thought it would be amusing to tease your silliness, and it has been.
Who said they were indifferent?
I just said I am not going to point fingers.
hardly. I look at behaviors and ask why would someone do that. Then I look at a catalog of past behaviors.
It is hardly as you describe.
For example I might ask why would someone think of something else that annoyed them?
Your ask yourself a question in your own head, then impute the answer to others, or call them names.
Sounds about right.
Back to zen I see.Your ask yourself a question in your own head, then impute the answer to others, or call them names.
Sounds about right.
There is an obvious inference in the question because some behaviors are obvious. It's not mind reading sorry.
yeah, you determine what posters others think and feel based on your own internal dialogue. thanks for clearing that up.
yeah, you determine what posters others think and feel based on your own internal dialogue. thanks for clearing that up.
You are not even arguing it anymore just complaining that I made the argument.
Not complaining at all, just restating your own post. The thumbs up was approval.
You are not even arguing it anymore just complaining that I made the argument.
yes except the entirety where you make it seem like it as all in my head.
"you determine what posters others think and feel based on your own internal dialogue."
Not so. Considering what people do is at core. I determine what people think by what they do and what they tell me. Thus me reminding you of what you had told me.
Like I mentioned in another thread, you have a tendency to personalize things -- even when it's not a bespoke personal call out thread.
you tell me I do something and when I disagree you tell me I tend to personalize things? isn't that already baked in? hho do I excise myself from the conversation?
I was just saying your description of my method was not correct.
No, you do it all the time. With other posters, abandoning the topic, turning threads into pointless slapfights.
(I get that this thread was a pointless slapfight from the get go.)
So my disagreeing with your description of my method is a slap fight?
I was just saying I consider that people say and do. That is a slap fight?
I think you are projecting and projecting hard.
you say in a bespoke slapfight thread that you created
The reason I created this thread is because I got sick of chump derailing thread after thread pretending his questions were important as he acts out OCD fixation over and over and over and over again.
'Slap fight' that my be that has nothing to do with you. I have cast no aspersions your way. I'm sorry that he does that when I talk with you but I have no beef with you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
