What I find so interesting is that conversation was a decade ago and you have been holding on to it for so long. I know the whole rent free concept is important to you and all I can say is
Let's relive it shall we?
So you were peddling the idea that black people are more prone to violence because of a so called 'warrior gene.' You even had this article that you thought explained it.
Prima facie, I pointed out that the gene was not bound by race and it should have never been expected because race was irrelevant to genetics.
It was at that point I explained to you how the current racial paradigm in the US is mostly as it is because of white people line breed (read: inbreeding) for a white skin phenotype. that upset you so I had to explain further.
See you were breaking the world down into skin color and making suppositions off that. straight dumb. genetics operates in isolated populations known as haplogroups. there are several in the US for example. while skin color in texas and south africa are the same, the genetic makeups of the populations are distinct is the take away here. thinking that you can equate two from those distinct populations on phenotype like skin color was monumentally ignorant.
So I did my usual "why would someone do that" with this whole thing and all I can say is
I mean you stopped arguing on merit, fragmented hard, and are always angry but telling people you are not.
Reply With Quote
