Page 177 of 442 FirstFirst ... 77127167173174175176177178179180181187227277 ... LastLast
Results 4,401 to 4,425 of 11031
  1. #4401
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    The point is to show a downward trend (is he really a good shooter if it continues to drop?) and that he provides nothing else when his shot is off.
    That and the fact that draft observers consistently seemed to be dubious that he could keep the good shooting up, as if THAT was the exception not the other way around.

    To be clear I also like Risacher and would be happy with the selection. I just think Williams has the potential to possibly offer other things over time, like play making, size for the position (RZ is + 0 wingspan), and potentially better defense.

  2. #4402
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    He's not playing like a center. He's playing like a guy who could easily play with a center. The more he improves those parts of his game, the more easily he can play PF. If he's going to play center, he has some steps to take there offensively, and I don't know if that's where he's going to put his dev points. The Spurs should try a variety of legit archetypes next to him and not get complacent at the position
    Trust the rest of us on this, you are wrong. Even Pop, who apparently thought like you at the start of the season, quickly realized his mistake. There isn't a single scenario where Wemby's best version of himself comes at any other position that isn't center, so please let's stop with this argument because it is a monumental waste of time. The only sure thing the Spurs have going for the next decade is Wembanyama at the center position, let's not overthink that.

  3. #4403
    Kiwi, Advanced Stat Fan
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    1,146
    Wemby's movement and length means he can play a bunch of roles on D, from the Rudy / Brook Lopez dominating around the rim role, to the Celtics use of Rob Williams as a roamer / helper. Both are playing Center, but he can do both. Think he's most valuable as a rim deterrent for now, though he could become a pterodactyl off ball roamer on D.

    I'd be interested in the Spurs getting Isaac as a 4 who can cover centres better than Sochan can (for now, muscle development would help), but I don't think a 3 - 5 like that exists in the draft (hard archetype to fill).

  4. #4404
    Make a trade steal
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    12,058
    Trust the rest of us on this, you are wrong. Even Pop, who apparently thought like you at the start of the season, quickly realized his mistake. There isn't a single scenario where Wemby's best version of himself comes at any other position that isn't center, so please let's stop with this argument because it is a monumental waste of time. The only sure thing the Spurs have going for the next decade is Wembanyama at the center position, let's not overthink that.
    He doesn't want to be stuck at center. He has made it clear he wants to not only be a center.

    He wants the ability to shoot on the perimeter at times and another low post player allows him some flexibilty do move away from center at times. Need to make him happy or he is gone.

  5. #4405
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    He doesn't want to be stuck at center. He has made it clear he wants to not only be a center.

    He wants the ability to shoot on the perimeter at times and another low post player allows him some flexibilty do move away from center at times. Need to make him happy or he is gone.
    Does it seem like he's being stuck out there? The kid is shooting threes, running pick and rolls as the ball handler and bringing the ball up the court. The difference is that he's way more efficient doing all of that when he doesn't have another bigman with him getting in his way.

  6. #4406
    Believe. @ByndExistnz
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Post Count
    869
    Is there a way to morph Tyler Kolek's smarts and skills into Sarr's body? That's what we need.

    Short of that, my highest aspiration is to be pleasantly surprised by one of our picks in this draft. Might be a year to trade some/all picks.
    speaking of Tyler Kolek, here’s an interesting scouting report on his last game. Me wants!


  7. #4407
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Trust the rest of us on this, you are wrong. Even Pop, who apparently thought like you at the start of the season, quickly realized his mistake. There isn't a single scenario where Wemby's best version of himself comes at any other position that isn't center, so please let's stop with this argument because it is a monumental waste of time. The only sure thing the Spurs have going for the next decade is Wembanyama at the center position, let's not overthink that.
    Pop didn't "Think like me" because I think Wemby should be playing center right now. That's the position his current combination of skill and physical traits lends itself to. A lot of people thought he'd have to play PF because he wouldn't have the girth to play the five. The reality is that he doesn't have the refinement to play the four yet. It seems clear that he wants to be a forward, but he can't hang there consistently in the NBA until he develops his handles and overall floor game more.

    To a few of us, it's very apparent that Victor is going to need to take some time to improve his own play if the Spurs are going to eventually become a real contender. The question is what shape that improvement will take. If it's becoming a center, he'll need to work on offensive timing, screen setting and post-moves (because that's still where centers iso) and in general build strength to limit how often the Spurs cross-match against opposing centers. If Victor gets his wish and he moves more into a perimeter style, he'll be tightening up his handles, working on his PnR ball-handling game and eventually develop consistent go-to moves in the high post.

    The skills he develops will determine what sorts of players will fit with him and thus what "position" he'll play. There's no reason to pigeonhole the best prospect ever, especially when it's against his wishes.

  8. #4408
    Born Slippy
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    3,471
    At this point, I believe you're confusing him with someone else.

    As detailed in any scouting report, for those who just never simply watched him... Sarr is an athletic big whose vertical and lateral mobility, that allows him to defend the rim and the perimeter, are what makes him a top prospect in this draft. He can and will play PF in the NBA, the comparison doesn't stand overall, but he's comparable to Kevin Garnett in terms of mobilty.

    He wouldn't be there otherwise.

    (You can start at 1:45 and skip the dude talk, then notably and more attentively check at the 3:00 mark, to have a clearer idea of his lateral mobility).

    Seeing Sarr first hand at wildcats games to know this scouting report pretty much echo's what I've said and watched of him .

  9. #4409
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    Pop didn't "Think like me" because I think Wemby should be playing center right now. That's the position his current combination of skill and physical traits lends itself to. A lot of people thought he'd have to play PF because he wouldn't have the girth to play the five. The reality is that he doesn't have the refinement to play the four yet. It seems clear that he wants to be a forward, but he can't hang there consistently in the NBA until he develops his handles and overall floor game more.

    To a few of us, it's very apparent that Victor is going to need to take some time to improve his own play if the Spurs are going to eventually become a real contender. The question is what shape that improvement will take. If it's becoming a center, he'll need to work on offensive timing, screen setting and post-moves (because that's still where centers iso) and in general build strength to limit how often the Spurs cross-match against opposing centers. If Victor gets his wish and he moves more into a perimeter style, he'll be tightening up his handles, working on his PnR ball-handling game and eventually develop consistent go-to moves in the high post.

    The skills he develops will determine what sorts of players will fit with him and thus what "position" he'll play. There's no reason to pigeonhole the best prospect ever, especially when it's against his wishes.
    When will Spurs fans that want to see Wemby as a forward stop spreading this fake news?

    Wemby never said anything about not wanting to play center (at least publicly, and I supose internally either since that's the position the Spurs have him playing), he has played center his entire life. He just wants "not to be put on a box". Just like centers like Jokic and Embiid aren't. Do yall feel like Wemby is being put in a box despite playing center? Of course not.

    Wemby will never be at his best at the forward position. He will never have tight handles because his center of gravity is just way too high. He can work on his handles as much as he wants, he will still get stripped countless times if he's trying to attack from the perimeter like a traditional wing. It works as a center as a change of pace, not the other way around.

    It is also a disservice not to have him around the rim as much as possible. Again, he can shoot a three here or run a pick and roll as the ball hander there, but that can't be his bread and butter. There's no scenario where the Spurs get the most out of Wemby while he's staying out on the perimeter while a less skilled, less physically imposing bigman gets the touches closer to the basket.

    I know you always had a hard time adapting to this "only one bigman" NBA era, but it is time for you to let it go. I really didn't think we would still be arguing about this matter at this point of the season, tbh.

  10. #4410
    Born Slippy
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    3,471
    That perimeter defense of quicker players on the switch really stood for me in the playoffs. Altho Sarrs usage on offense went down.

  11. #4411
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    6,517
    That's different than your assesment that "he can shoot". Currently, he can't, tbh.

    I'm tired of gettig all these projects that need working on their shooting. How many of those have we actually developed into good shooters? Sochan, Keldon, Tre, Wesley, Siddy. Not a single one has become a reliable shooter and chances are they won't ever. This Williams kid will probably end up being the same. For every Kawhi, there are tens of players that never develop their shot. I think it is time for the Spurs to draft some actually good shooters, we have no more room for more projects, tbh.

    I get ur point and agree but that’s the era we live in with the one and dones…

    Im not saying he’s a sure thing but that his main weakness is the easiest thing to work and improve on.

    Whoever we pick will have « ? » and I’d rather bet on a perfect NBA prototype to develop than an undersized player or one that has injury risks.

    again only because nobody in this draft class seems a sure thing.

  12. #4412
    Veteran Dejounte's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    15,644
    How much different is he playing than a rich man's Ibaka, though? He's often not even playing center on defense nowadays. The Spurs are cross-guarding with Sochan against elite centers and letting Jeremy get cooked while Victor roams the weakside. I don't see why doing that more permanently but with a player who can actually guard the position playing there instead. So far we're talking about undersized folks and Collins (who basically inspires every opponent to go at him as hard as they can) as options.



    I don't know that Wemby's a very good vertical spacer, let alone the best ever. He has some big natural advantages there, but his inexperience is glaring. It's getting written on as his teammates' fault, but if one actually looks at the great vertical spacers in league history, there's a lot they do that Victor is maybe just starting to incorporate. He should be the best shot-blocker very soon if he hasn't gotten there, but not every elite shot-blocker played center. He's a very good rebounder, but it's not like him rebounding less as a PF is a bad thing. It's only bad when the center isn't rebounding to make up for it.



    Wemby's future deserves an actual consideration though, and not just a flippant glance. Is he a big, or is he just big? There's a continuum between wings tall enough to play the five and true centers, and not everyone on the list would count as part of a "two-big lineup". That's why Wemby's development has a large effect here. If he's going to continue to trend toward a floor game and perimeter shooting, he's going to be more of a oversized wing like Durant or Giannis rather than a stretch-five like Porzingas. It seems pretty clear Wemby at least wants a chance to explore becoming the former before settling into the later, and part of the environment the Spurs are creating is to allow him to have that chance. That means they shouldn't write off playing centers next to him during this transition time to see if it can work. But if they play stretch-fives, it basically defeats the purpose of the versatility. If he's there at 33, I would be a big fan of drafting Edey to see what happens. It doesn't have to work, but that would be far preferable than committing to another year of Collins, Bassey and Barlow as the only options.



    Reid's a good player, but he's not the only archetype that should be tried.
    Yeah, no. Wemby is a lot different than Ibaka. This is diminishing a lot of what Wemby does on defense. Wemby “controls” the paint and intimidates other players from scoring inside. He’s an actual presence like you know… most centers. Ibaka is nowhere close to that level.

    This seems like one of those things we’ll look back to and see how very wrong the other person was, and I’m confident I won’t be the guy that’s wrong. It’s clear as day they’re sticking with Wemby at center. The majority who thought previously he would be a PF (and even a SF) have become a minority now and that minority will soon be nobody when next season is done.

  13. #4413
    Costly Mistakes JPB's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    5,180
    Yeah, no. Wemby is a lot different than Ibaka. This is diminishing a lot of what Wemby does on defense. Wemby “controls” the paint and intimidates other players from scoring inside. He’s an actual presence like you know… most centers. Ibaka is nowhere close to that level.

    This seems like one of those things we’ll look back to and see how very wrong the other person was, and I’m confident I won’t be the guy that’s wrong. It’s clear as day they’re sticking with Wemby at center. The majority who thought previously he would be a PF (and even a SF) have become a minority now and that minority will soon be nobody when next season is done.
    Wemby's playing like a center on defense but it's "clear as water" he doesn't on offense. Spurs don't ask him to just stay in the paint, low post and rebound. He's playing like a tall (very tall) wing on offense, starting the sets a lot of time on the perimeter, driving, shooting 3s off the driblle and making plays.

    Adding another dynamic big who can screen, rebound, catches lob and mobile enough to defend opposing bigs or wings can be intriguing and interesting depending on match ups. That'll always be better than Sochan or whatever spurs have now.

  14. #4414
    Remember Cherokee Parks The Truth #6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    6,911
    Saying Wemby is a center seems basically correct in that he's the only big man out there when he plays, but he's sort of redefining that role, so I think it's fair to question if what he's doing is really a center as we have come to know it. He's playing all over the floor so I guess you could call him a stretch center. But the more he stretches, the more wiggle room there is to play alongside another big man, in theory. To me, overall, it's sort of a gray area. Personally I just leave it at that.

    On a tangent, when Victor plays everywhere and he's allowed to do that, obviously as he should being his first year and being a generational talent, the flip side is that when the whole court is his, it is going to be hard for the other players to figure out their geographic space as well as their role. That's going to be hard for 19 and 20-year-old young players to figure out right away.

    Anyway. Back to the draft.

  15. #4415
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Yeah, no. Wemby is a lot different than Ibaka. This is diminishing a lot of what Wemby does on defense. Wemby “controls” the paint and intimidates other players from scoring inside. He’s an actual presence like you know… most centers. Ibaka is nowhere close to that level.
    How he plays and the effect he has on other players aren't the same thing. He had that intimidation factor when he played PF too. It's just Collins is the anti-Wemby. Again, taking Wemby/Collins not working as proof Wemby has to play center is the thing I take issue with Wemby plays weakside shot-blocker more than anything else defensively, and that's not the traditional task of a center, especially not exclusively.

    This seems like one of those things we’ll look back to and see how very wrong the other person was, and I’m confident I won’t be the guy that’s wrong. It’s clear as day they’re sticking with Wemby at center. The majority who thought previously he would be a PF (and even a SF) have become a minority now and that minority will soon be nobody when next season is done.
    Who cares? Who cares if we're right or wrong on a message board? We're not having these discussions to predict the future or to manifest change. It certainly doesn't matter how many fans think Wemby will play as a forward versus at center, just like the inverse didn't matter last year. What'll be will be.

  16. #4416
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    When will Spurs fans that want to see Wemby as a forward stop spreading this fake news?

    Wemby never said anything about not wanting to play center (at least publicly, and I supose internally either since that's the position the Spurs have him playing), he has played center his entire life. He just wants "not to be put on a box". Just like centers like Jokic and Embiid aren't. Do yall feel like Wemby is being put in a box despite playing center? Of course not.
    Jokic and Embiid are not atypical centers just because they have additional skills. They're primarily post centers and great rebounders who need to be the biggest/slowest players on the floor. Considering guys like Bam also play the position, the center "box" doesn't really exist and wouldn't be worth fighting about. Maybe that's what Victor meant, but that interpretation needs more support than emojis.

    Wemby will never be at his best at the forward position. He will never have tight handles because his center of gravity is just way too high. He can work on his handles as much as he wants, he will still get stripped countless times if he's trying to attack from the perimeter like a traditional wing. It works as a center as a change of pace, not the other way around.
    It doesn't work right now. The only reason why Victor's perimeter game doesn't get more criticism is because the Spurs are awful. People constantly on the team for failing Wemby while overlooking how much that lack of meaningful games allow him to freelance. Teams are guarding him with PFs now because the Spurs don't have a front-court mate that will stop them from doing it.

    It is also a disservice not to have him around the rim as much as possible. Again, he can shoot a three here or run a pick and roll as the ball hander there, but that can't be his bread and butter. There's no scenario where the Spurs get the most out of Wemby while he's staying out on the perimeter while a less skilled, less physically imposing bigman gets the touches closer to the basket.
    See this sounds exactly like putting him in a box by your definition. If Wemby specs into more perimeter skills and doesn't spec into skills in the paint, he's going to be more like the latter scenario you mentioned. Again a guy like Giannis is amazing despite not being the shooter Wemby is, so I'm not sure the only option is that he stands around the perimeter rather than being a more traditional wing slasher.

    I know you always had a hard time adapting to this "only one bigman" NBA era, but it is time for you to let it go. I really didn't think we would still be arguing about this matter at this point of the season, tbh.
    What a random shot. I think you'll find plenty of evidence for me talking about single-big offenses over the years. I'm the same guy who talks about Keldon playing PF and Gay playing center. Just because I have a mind open to things you don't agree with doesn't mean I can only think in those ways.

  17. #4417
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    I don't know that Wemby's a very good vertical spacer, let alone the best ever. He has some big natural advantages there, but his inexperience is glaring. It's getting written on as his teammates' fault, but if one actually looks at the great vertical spacers in league history, there's a lot they do that Victor is maybe just starting to incorporate. He should be the best shot-blocker very soon if he hasn't gotten there, but not every elite shot-blocker played center. He's a very good rebounder, but it's not like him rebounding less as a PF is a bad thing. It's only bad when the center isn't rebounding to make up for it.



    Wemby's future deserves an actual consideration though, and not just a flippant glance. Is he a big, or is he just big? There's a continuum between wings tall enough to play the five and true centers, and not everyone on the list would count as part of a "two-big lineup". That's why Wemby's development has a large effect here. If he's going to continue to trend toward a floor game and perimeter shooting, he's going to be more of a oversized wing like Durant or Giannis rather than a stretch-five like Porzingas. It seems pretty clear Wemby at least wants a chance to explore becoming the former before settling into the later, and part of the environment the Spurs are creating is to allow him to have that chance. That means they shouldn't write off playing centers next to him during this transition time to see if it can work. But if they play stretch-fives, it basically defeats the purpose of the versatility. If he's there at 33, I would be a big fan of drafting Edey to see what happens. It doesn't have to work, but that would be far preferable than committing to another year of Collins, Bassey and Barlow as the only options.



    Reid's a good player, but he's not the only archetype that should be tried.
    Well, he has the widest catch radius, so he certainly has the highest potential. Sure, certain technical things could use refinement, but that's to be expected at 20.

    The point is, if someone can do center like things at an elite level and their skillset/physical advantages are more pronounced at it, then they're a center. It doesn't matter what style they play it in. Of course he's not a "true" one in the mold of Jokic, Embiid, etc. Davis, Sabonis, Adebayo, Porzingis, etc. aren't either, they're still centers.

    Playing him next to a rim runner or post up player would be Collins and Bassey redux.

  18. #4418
    Veteran Atl Spur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    4,608
    Wemby at is best will be a stretch 4 / help defender and a small ball 5 against certain lineups. He has the mobility / agility to wreak havoc. Get him a big body to pair next to him…

  19. #4419
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Well, he has the widest catch radius, so he certainly has the highest potential. Sure, certain technical things could use refinement, but that's to be expected at 20.
    I would say he's behind the curve there, though. Guys with less physical gifts than Victor but who grew up playing center have a lot of experience with these types of actions. That Wemby struggles to set good screens despite being a center at the professional level for years is all the evidence one needs for his inexperience.

    The point is, if someone can do center like things at an elite level and their skillset/physical advantages are more pronounced at it, then they're a center. It doesn't matter what style they play it in. Of course he's not a "true" one in the mold of Jokic, Embiid, etc. Davis, Sabonis, Adebayo, Porzingis, etc. aren't either, they're still centers.
    None of those guys can play with other centers, which is something Wemby might develop to being able to do. I would definitely put Victor further along in that curve toward being a wing than the examples you listed, though how far remains to be seen. I have no doubt that Wemby can be a center long term. I just think he might develop into a combo-big where playing with a center for long stretches is what he does.

    Playing him next to a rim runner or post up player would be Collins and Bassey redux.
    Collins shouldn't be evidence of much, because he's been awful most of the time. Even before we knew that, I suggested he looked more like a single-big player anyway. Bassey and Wemby played well together, so I don't think they have a reason to scratch that archetype off the list yet. Getting a better Bassey would be one of my goals, as well as swapping Charles and Dom out for other centers to keep the experiment going.

  20. #4420
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    Saying that Wemby should play alongside another big is being ridiculous.
    Every team in the league is trying to be as mobile as possible and you'd want to take away Wemby's advantage over traditional bigs?

    In a year or two, noone will be able to stay in front of him. And you want to take that away?
    The entire point of small lineups is to run the traditional bigs off the floor and we'll be able to do it with a 7'4 GOAT defender.

    Positions on offense don't matter anymore. On defense he's a center for all intents and purposes.
    The only reason to play him together with another big would be if he couldn't handle someone in the post.
    But he's already proven that he's as good as anyone at matching up with MVP level bigs.
    Get a big, two-way wing that can shoot as his front court partner and we're good to go.

    While Victor's perimeter game right now is erratic and unpolished, most of those bad plays are a product of noone else being able to create and then Victor is forced to do it.
    And I actually like that he's doing it. We're not competing, it's better for him to figure out what he can and can't do.

  21. #4421
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    I have a slightly different approach angle to the discussion of whether Wemby is a center, or a power forward, or a small forward, etc...

    Rather than debating if Wemby is a center in the traditionalway we think about centers... or a PF in the traditional way we think about PFs... I think the reality is that Wemby is the "Center (of the team)" and will redefine the way lineups are built around him. Whatever historical constructs of lineups have existed in the past need not apply. All that matters is what optimizes what you get from a lineup that features Wemby (which is different than optimizing the output you get from Wemby). In an era of position-less basketball, Wemby is the cheat code: the position-less player.

    Positions are irrelevant, archetypes are what matter when dreaming up optimal lineup constructions around Wemby. Most of the time, Wemby will likely most closely resemble what we think of as a center, but we'll continue to see what we have all year - glimpses of him playing other roles. That versatility can create a degree of unpredictability that can cripple other teams.

    The above is a reason I'm not interested in Saar. I think Saar lacks that versatility and freezes Wemby out of certain opportunities while they share the floor with one another, because those roles are the only ones Saar can thrive in. We need players surrounding Wemby that don't crowd Wemby out, instead we need players who fill up the space that Wemby is incapable of occupying (lead ball handler, sniper, etc).

  22. #4422
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Sarr and Wemby could end up being just fine on the defensive end. i just have some questions about offense. as chinook has pointed out, the wemby/bassey pairing was actually fine in their limited time together, and sarr profiles as a pure upgrade to bassey.

    but if the spurs are in a position to take sarr, they better do all kinds of due diligence and have a pretty ing good idea beforehand whether the two can coexist. cant go with another "well lets just see how it goes" season. i know its hard to do, but its also their in job, and theres a reason we dolts are just here on a messageboard and elsewhere people do this as their full time job

  23. #4423
    R.C. Deez Nuts. Mugen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    23,765
    Sarr and Wemby could end up being just fine on the defensive end. i just have some questions about offense. as chinook has pointed out, the wemby/bassey pairing was actually fine in their limited time together, and sarr profiles as a pure upgrade to bassey.

    but if the spurs are in a position to take sarr, they better do all kinds of due diligence and have a pretty ing good idea beforehand whether the two can coexist. cant go with another "well lets just see how it goes" season. i know its hard to do, but its also their in job, and theres a reason we dolts are just here on a messageboard and elsewhere people do this as their full time job
    In PATFO we trust


  24. #4424
    Costly Mistakes JPB's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    5,180
    Sarr and Wemby could end up being just fine on the defensive end. i just have some questions about offense. as chinook has pointed out, the wemby/bassey pairing was actually fine in their limited time together, and sarr profiles as a pure upgrade to bassey.

    but if the spurs are in a position to take sarr, they better do all kinds of due diligence and have a pretty ing good idea beforehand whether the two can coexist. cant go with another "well lets just see how it goes" season. i know its hard to do, but its also their in job, and theres a reason we dolts are just here on a messageboard and elsewhere people do this as their full time job
    One thing is sure to me, Sarr could be fine as a back up. So that's a dozen to 15 minutes/game for him. could they coexist like 8-10 min a game if you need more rebounds and rim protection on defense and have two mobile bigs playing the two man game with Wemby as a shooter and playmaker on offense? that's intriguing, I should say... Jokic size allows him to play above the game and defense to find passes PGs can't. A Wemby/Sarr lob or entry pass to the other is unguardable, both playing above the defense, then eventually finding shooters or cutters around. (Now, you have to find those shooters).

    Vic/Sarr/3 shooters could work for short stints.
    Like Vic/Sarr/Trae or Brogdon/SG (Vassell)/3&D wing
    Last edited by JPB; 03-26-2024 at 04:06 PM.

  25. #4425
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    One thing is sure to me, Sarr could be fine as a back up. So that's a dozen to 15 minutes/game for him. could they coexist like 8-10 min a game if you need more rebounds and rim protection on defense and have two mobile bigs playing the two man game with Wemby as a shooter and playmaker on offense? that's intriguing, I should say... Jokic size allows him to play above the game and defense to find passes PGs can't. A Wemby/Sarr lob or entry pass to the other is unguardable, both playing above the defense, then eventually finding shooters or cutters around. (Now, you have to find those shooters).

    Vic/Sarr/3 shooters could work for short stints.
    i know its not a great draft, but i'd be hard-pressed to use a top 3 pick on a guy im earmarking to be a full time backup. if im taking him there, its because i believe he can play alongside vic as well as serve as a backup.

    so, if Vic starts playing 32-33 mpg, Sarr plays about 15-16 minutes as the backup and also another 10 alongside Vic, at least as a rookie

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •