Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 382
  1. #251
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    STers are deep in their meme bag with Keldon. There are trades where moving him makes sense. But because replacing him will cost at least what he makes, it's not the solution so many want it to be. That's even more true when you're talking about trading him away to (slightly) improve a pick rather than getting a new one.

    You aren't trading Castle for Keldon. You're trading Keldon for the peace of mind knowing that you don't have to wait an extra three picks to take Castle. The Spurs shouldn't pass on Castle at 4 if they feel that strongly about him. Risacher would be nice because there is almost certainly going to be a PG at 8 that will work. But in and of himself he's just a decent wing prospect. If Castle can't be out a decent wing prospect, he's not worth trading Keldon and a top-10 pick to acquire.

    But let's entertain the trade, because as I said, there are paths forward.



    After this trade (and assuming the Spurs pay a team to take Graham's guaranteed money off their hands), the Spurs would have about $39.7 Million in cap space. Their depth chart would look like this:


    Jones, Castle, Wesley
    Vassell, Branham,
    Risacher, Champangie
    Sochan, Cissoko
    Wembanyama, Collins, Bassey


    So ... What? I guess they can try to get Monk signed to a $100M/4 deal. That leaves $16.4 Million in cap space. Then there'd be the room exception for $8 Million. So let's add O'Neale and Osman.


    Jones, Castle, Wesley
    Vassell, Monk, Branham
    Risacher, O'Neale, Champangie
    Sochan, Osman, Cissoko
    Wembanyama, Collins, Bassey

    It's not a bad result, but there are mock off-seasons that involve picking Sheppard, Dillingham and more. If the Spurs truly feel like there are two blue-chippers on the board at their pick, and they have a deal in place to snag both, I would trust the FO to do what they think is right. But if they're just preferable to near-equal prospects, then I don't see how you could do this trade. Just have draft discipline.
    Agreed. It’s not the end of the world if SA does this, but as I said, they better truly believe in these guys being legit all star level guys to smoke Keldon + 8 for them given how this draft seems and how they rate as overall prospects (not prospects just comparatively to who is in this draft).

    If Im SA and you really want pick 5, I would much prefer using pick 8 + a future pick and just keep Keldon while getting your guys in the draft. That way, you aren’t worried about free agency and needing to replace him and you can also have him to use for something more valuable if need be later on due to his talent and contract.

  2. #252
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495
    Think the Dillingham dream might be dead tbh. Don't see the Spurs taking him at 8 anymore. Think they're looking for positional size.

  3. #253
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Also since I argued no way Keldon would have Poeltl's trade value, Poeltl's VORP the season he was traded and the season before were 1.9 and 1.7 while Keldon is barely above replacement level at 0.2 VORP (and 0.1 the year before). I think Spurs fans might have to come to terms with the idea that maybe Keldon Johnson is just a dime a dozen player in this league.
    Last edited by baseline bum; 06-16-2024 at 11:31 PM.

  4. #254
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,167
    Think the Dillingham dream might be dead tbh. Don't see the Spurs taking him at 8 anymore. Think they're looking for positional size.
    That Dillingham video I posted above, shows why he'll be such a good offensive fit with Wemby.

  5. #255
    Go to baselinebums.com NASpurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    30,565
    Also since I argued no way Keldon would have Poeltl's trade value, Poeltl's VORP the season he was traded and the season before were 1.9 and 1.7 while Keldon is barely above replacement level at 0.2 VORP (and 0.1 the year before). I think Spurs fans might have to come to terms with the idea that maybe Keldon Johnson is just a dime a dozen player in this league.
    Yeah he's a midget PF who goes through hot/cold shooting spells, can't play defense and does nothing spectacular on either end except yell. He was good for the tank but we need to move on.

  6. #256
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    I know you're not a Castle fan so what if the scenario is Sarr, Clingan, and Castle are taken in the top 3 and you can trade up to #5 for Sheppard to pair with Risacher?
    I mean personally I’d just sit and take Risacher and Dillingham

  7. #257
    Believe. playblair's Avatar
    My Team
    Milwaukee Bucks
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    5,364
    Think the Dillingham dream might be dead tbh. Don't see the Spurs taking him at 8 anymore. Think they're looking for positional size.
    that has been brian wrights archetype since his gm in detroit days.......nearly all brian wright picks have been busts.........dinwiddie is the only player brian wright has ever gotten right in a draft..........

  8. #258
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Also since I argued no way Keldon would have Poeltl's trade value, Poeltl's VORP the season he was traded and the season before were 1.9 and 1.7 while Keldon is barely above replacement level at 0.2 VORP (and 0.1 the year before). I think Spurs fans might have to come to terms with the idea that maybe Keldon Johnson is just a dime a dozen player in this league.
    Maybe theres some truth to that, but hes had seasons above that (I think he had a .9 season) and theres been a lot of flux.

  9. #259
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Maybe theres some truth to that, but hes had seasons above that (I think he had a .9 season) and theres been a lot of flux.
    He’s not a playmaker. He doesn’t shoot well. He doesn’t defend well. The latter two are typically how role players have an impact

  10. #260
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    Julian Champagnie is better than Keldon Johnson.

  11. #261
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Prime example of ST meming. Some folks haven't realized that having flaws is not the same thing as being bad. That line of thinking is how Spurs Pau was talked about as a liability despite being one of the better defensive centers in the NBA and how Tre Jones can be one of the best defenders on the team while having folks obsessing over putting in a bigger PG for defensive purposes. Keldon is certainly flawed, and unless some things change, it's likely the team can't afford to play him big minutes when they start trying to contend. However, that time isn't now. The team's focus should be on converting the assets and flexibility they have into a deep roster that can sustain the loss of talent that comes with a big trade. They only have a handful of legit NBA rotation players. They shouldn't burn one of the few they have in a goal of maybe improving another position.

    I've said before that I believe adding a running mate off the bench for Johnson would dramatically improve the second unit. Maybe that's drafting Dillingham. Maybe that's signing Monk. Maybe that's trading for Clarkson. There are a lot of paths to go. Ideally, the Spurs would be 8-10 deep with legit players/strong prospects. As far as who beats whom and where everyone should slot, let their play determine that instead of preemptively getting rid of every player who's ever wrong you.

  12. #262
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Yup. This board has lost the plot completely on Keldon imo. Can he be improved upon? Absolutely. Is he a bad player? Nope.

  13. #263
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    He’s not a playmaker. He doesn’t shoot well. He doesn’t defend well. The latter two are typically how role players have an impact

    His playmaking improved notably imo.

  14. #264
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    Yup. This board has lost the plot completely on Keldon imo. Can he be improved upon? Absolutely. Is he a bad player? Nope.
    Is he a bad player for current Spurs roster? No.
    But that's only because this roster barely has any actual NBA players.

    Is he a bad player if we talk playoff team rosters? Absolutely.
    He's a traffic cone on defense, has negative IQ on both ends which leads to those tunnel vision drives and bad shot selection.
    Decent energy guy for bad teams, but players like him are a non-factor in the playoffs.

    He's been with the Spurs for five seasons. He is what he is.
    I'd much rather get rid of him right now hile some teams still might be dumb enough to think he has positive value than just let him go for nothing in a year.

  15. #265
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    That’s fine but salary dumping him is silly.

  16. #266
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    That’s fine but salary dumping him is silly.
    I didn't say anything about salary dumping.
    There are still teams that value him and if there's a good deal to be made, PATFO should do it.
    He'd get salary dumped next year after everyone realizes he's not good.

  17. #267
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    No one hates Spurs players more than Spurs fans, and SpursTalk is the summit of Spurs player hate. SpursTalk despises almost every single player who has ever played for this franchise other than maybe four or five.

  18. #268
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    No one hates Spurs players more than Spurs fans, and SpursTalk is the summit of Spurs player hate. SpursTalk despises almost every single player who has ever played for this franchise other than maybe four or five.
    Go on and keep projecting just because I don't rate a player who's had five years to show off his talent and has made no improvements whatsoever.
    The only positive thing about Keldon is that he seems to be a great guy and a vocal leader of the team.

  19. #269
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    That’s fine but salary dumping him is silly.
    You keep calling it salary dumping when it's moving an inconsequential player to get someone the team might really want. Keldon will be 25 on opening night, he is as good right now as he'll most likely ever be. It's not like I'm saying dump Sochan to move up to 5.

  20. #270
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    He’s not a playmaker. He doesn’t shoot well. He doesn’t defend well. The latter two are typically how role players have an impact
    I’ll give you that his shooting is up and down, but his career mark is ~36%. He’s shot 40% for a season, so to say he can’t shoot is just hating. He’s also averaged 2.9 and 2.8 assists the last two years as someone who’s not handling the ball all that much. If you like advanced stats, his assist % the last two years has been 13.7 and 14.2. His asst/to ratio last year was 2.

  21. #271
    Go to baselinebums.com NASpurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    30,565
    No one hates Spurs players more than Spurs fans, and SpursTalk is the summit of Spurs player hate. SpursTalk despises almost every single player who has ever played for this franchise other than maybe four or five.
    You should cry about this very subject on reddit. You can circle jerk there to your hearts content.

  22. #272
    El rojo y los Spurs!!! Ariel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    4,175
    I've already come to terms with the fact that the Spurs won't take Dillingham at 8. I just hope they use the pick on something productive, and not Primo v2.0

  23. #273
    El rojo y los Spurs!!! Ariel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    4,175
    Nah - too many on this board are way off on not just Keldon the player but valuations. Could Keldon net 5 on its own? I think so especially for a team like DET., but even if you don’t think so its not that far of IMO.

    Even if SA had to give up CHA pick + 2 2nds along with Keldon, its somewhere in that “range”
    I'd bet you my house that doesn't happen, but I won't because I know next thing you'd take that bet for real

  24. #274
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    You should cry about this very subject on reddit. You can circle jerk there to your hearts content.
    Me: "People on SpursTalk are idiots who hate their own players."

    You: "AMOOHONMGNGNGNALNWHARMGGLRLGLGLGMMBMBME"

  25. #275
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    You keep calling it salary dumping when it's moving an inconsequential player to get someone the team might really want. Keldon will be 25 on opening night, he is as good right now as he'll most likely ever be. It's not like I'm saying dump Sochan to move up to 5.
    Moving up 3 spots is salary dumping. Trading Keldon + pick 8 to go to 5 is salary dumping.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •