i'll give you tony, but manu was already a god before he even got to the nba
99
03
04
05
06
07
12
13
14
![]()
i'll give you tony, but manu was already a god before he even got to the nba
GNob was going to kick ass with virtually any team he went to.
He is that versatile and good.
Fortunately the Spurs got him and kept him.
So good no one picked him up until 57th.
Revisionist history. Might as well say Joker was obviously a 3 time MVP when he was drafted.
I had heard but was not sure.
Once he got in I quickly realized he was a joker, a wild card that changed a good team to a championship caliber team
Sure but "I love the team so they had the best roster for 10 years" is cringe as .
There is no doubt that for the Duncan years they underachieved
Should won more
Dumbass Pop had a lot to do with it
GA with the truth, bitter edition.
GA
was a different time, nba thought americans were better.
Decisions aren't made in retrospect.
It is funny how things work out. Imagine Manu coming up today. He would be as hyped as any other prospect in NBA's history. He's literally the perfect guard for today's NBA. And, yeah, he would be a PG in today's NBA.
So why did you have this poll? It doesn’t make any sense.
And you stated 10, you listed 9.
Overall, the Spurs had the best odds to win it all in 2005 (won), 2006 (lost), 2008 (tied with Mavs, lost) since 1997, and they won 5 les.
Their win lost record was over expectations every year except 1997 (due to massive injuries which led to Duncan), 00 (1.5 games), 04(0.5 games), 10 (4.5 games), 15 (2 games), 18 (8 games, Kawhi pulled a Kawhi), 20 (14.5 games), 23 (0.5 games, massive tanking year), and 24 (6.5 games). There were multiple seasons where the spurs were 10 games over preseason O/U wins. In 27 years, the regular season record was below betting lines 9 times. I would say that is pretty damn good.
Pops quit* year, being 2015 when he was out strategized by Doc Rivers should not be included.
While the Spurs still had the great Duncan an even below average coach would have advanced them past Coc Rivers, however would have probably been ousted by his butt buddy Kerr and the injury luck Warriors in the next round.
*The final game 7 vs Clippers, when the corrupt ref blew the whistle right as the Spurs final chance play was being inbounded. Instead of drawing up a new play, Pop pouted and Quit, wasting time falsely accusing the time clock person then calling the same exact play. Of course the Clippers read it, they knew it was coming and Game Over.
Also the year Juuan Coward took out the Spurs Derek Anderson with a super cheapshot should not be held against Popped.
Says pathetically corrupt Vegas or you?
You're agreeing that the Spurs only had the best roster in 3 farking years?!
So now you are throwing conspiracy theories on the wall. Vegas don't care about sticking it to Pop, they care about money. Let's set the odds, hey, the entire market is betting on the Spurs to win it all, but we would rather lose billions of dollars so that we can allow some internet nerds to win an argument 20 years down the line. I mean, are you that dense?
As for the Clippers comment, they were supposed to advance time after time, they did that one time, at the expense of the Spurs, but you keep putting up conspiracy theories out there.
SMH your not knowing how Vegas works. $$$$$
Nice backpedeal / subject change on Pop vs Doc Rivers in the 2015 Clippers series.
Show me how Vegas works, its all about which team is hot on the tables, and they adjust the odds to always make money, it's not that hard. The more a team is the favourite, the worse the odds.
And nice showing you don't even know what backpedal / subject change means, neither were applicable. Rivers won one series. 27 years and you found one series that Pop didn't do well in. Yes, that will show your point.
The topic was Championship rosters with a flame out before the Finals.
Rivers v Popped only ever happened the 1 year that i recall.
True to form, Pop got worked.
If you're aware of other Pop v Doc playoff series, please post.
BTW i don't know that the Spurs would have went on to Chip, but vs the super lucky injury benefitted Warriors they surely had a chance.
GNob
18 years old when signed first pro contract.
Kinder Bologna (BTW is that a lunchmeat brand name?), which he helped win the 2001 Italian League Championship,
the 2001 and 2002 Italian Cups, and the 2001 EuroLeague, where he was named the 2001 EuroLeague's Finals MVP.
He was also named the Italian League MVP in 2000–01 and 2001–02, and made the Italian League's All-Star Game three times during this period.
While playing with the Argentina national team at the 2002 FIBA World Championship in Indianapolis, Ginóbili made the All-Tournament Team, alongside future NBA star Yao Ming and established NBA stars Dirk Nowitzki and Peja Stojaković,[32] and helped lead Argentina to a second-place finish.[5]
So GNob had 6 freaking YEARS of pro hoop before joining the Spurs. As quoted, Pops tried to change his game for 2 more additional years before realizing how Manu played.
Any nonsense that Pop "developed" young GNob is sub zero BBIQ info.
Yeah, the spurs won 5 les when they were favourites for 3, and went over Vegas estimates in 2/3 of the pop era. How is that not successful? If you want to point to one single series “because doc”. The clippers had the fourth best odds to le that year and finished the year with a better record than the spurs. But you keep going “because doc”, a guy who won a le and was selected as one of the best coaches ever.
Also, And no, the topic isn’t about championship rosters flaming out, it’s about whether pop can be considered a GOAT with 17 of his 27 years in the league as a head coach. Larry brown won one le in like 30 years, he’s definitely on the list of goat coaches. You can’t even follow your own thread with the giant le on top.
Facepalm.
Doc is not one of the best coaches ever. To me.
So far you are giving me Vegas and media selections.
Son if Popped had Browns rosters he would have ZERO les.
You have given nothing. You don’t even have any argument. Vegas odds are pretty much the only way to gauge a teams expectations of the year. And the other part of media picks. Neither of which is acceptable to you. So what is? Your opinion?
Pretty sure Fabbs just wants to make a seemingly controversial statement then not follow up. He's done that plenty and the theme is basically half drunk sports bar bluster with no substance.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)