Reply With Quote
I’m saying wheee did cha appear from? Or just a rumor?
Apparently a sign and trade where Klay goes to Dallas, Green goes to Charlotte and stuff goes to GS. Not finalized, probably a weird one to be completed, especially from the GS side.
I’m saying wheee did cha appear from? Or just a rumor?
Thanks! I missed that. But still confused because I thought Dallas had a large enough TE to take in Klay
Brook Lopez would be a nice addition, just not sure what and who the Bucks want in return. I doubt it's Zach Collins. And I wouldn't trade a first for him neither. Give them 5 second round picks.
At that stage, I'm quite expecting Spurs to re-sign Osman and Mamu to one year contracts, waiving Graham and calling it an off-season. The idea behind these moves would be to keep a lot of flexibility.
That would make a ty off-season for Spurs.
So bad if that’s true & punting pick 8 for that makes less sense
Tre and Keldon for Brook kind of makes sense.
They'd have to add a couple of scrubs to match salaries.
They desperately need some depth on the perimeter and a backup point guard to load manage Lillard without sacrificing too many wins in the regular season.
dont quite see how this works. what do we give to match salaries? do they really want Zollins back who has a longer contract than BroLo? and if not, do we really want to roster Wemby, Lopez, and Collins at the same time making all that money. we want to re-try the Wemby at PF stuff?
i mean if they want to take Zollins back you obviously explore it, but i wouldnt give a first to get that done.
that would be too much to give up on our side. We'd have to get a first rounder out of that and then make another trade for an SF. That deal would make our roster worse. We could probably take part of Lopez salary into cap space and create a trade exception for the Bucks or something in that framework.
Just to be clear, I don't really see the point of getting someone like Brook only to be Wemby's backup.
I don't want another big to start with Wemby.
I don't really value Keldon, at this point he's got nothing going for him except for his energy and positive at ude.
Tre is an expiring and with CP3 addition I want Castle to play some actual point guard minutes, which won't happen if Tre is on the roster.
In short, I don't want Brook, but I want both Keldon and Tre gone.
I’d like Bobby Portis, idk about Lopez I think he’s pretty much washed at this point.
That’s the Graham contract
then they for sure could of brought in furphy.I dont understand the reasoning behind that.
I think it’s more MIL wanting to move Brook. They need to shed salary. A Zach or Brook trade straight up works, but I think we’d need a small asset coming back. Spurs are doing them the favor here bc of their money issues.
well we do need a rim protector coming off the bench to actually have a good defense, cause clearly Zach Collins ain't doing it. On the other hand Bassey might be able to handle that role, but I wouldn't be opposed to getting Brook, cause he can also stretch the floor.
BroLo makes no sense for this team tbh.
brook lopez would be an awful idea, makes negative zero sense
Brook Lopez is expiring and could get us more draft picks at the deadline. Help mentor Wemby while Chris Paul works with the guards. Put him in the Thad Young bubble so he doesn’t hurt his value with injury.
Lopez would be a huge upgrade over Collins. It would give the Spurs the best defensive center rotation in the league. Especially if the Spurs are trying to swing a win-now trade, paying some second to turn Zach into Brook would be a huge win.
If we could turn Collins and some seconds into Lopez I'm all for it, but I figure it'd take more than that.
Exactly.
Either tradable or if great fit extend
Exactly
I'm down with BroLo.
He is infinitely better than Collins at everything. He can body up Embiid, Gobert, AD, Jokic, etc. which will let Wemby be the 7'4" free safety.
IQ and shooting goes way up.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions