Reply With Quote
I wouldn't bench Vassell for Hield.
Hield would have been a very interesting bench piece for the Spurs, but I'm not crying in my cheerios over this one.
Word is the Hield S&T is getting folded into how they're getting Kyle Anderson and moving Klay to the Mavs. Or something. Either way, the Warriors are essentially 'trading' Klay for Kyle Anderson and Buddy Hield. Hield's production is falling, but so was KT's. Overall probably pretty good move.
I wouldn't bench Vassell for Hield.
Hield would have been a very interesting bench piece for the Spurs, but I'm not crying in my cheerios over this one.
I had a brain fart tbh, definitely starting Vassell over HieldBut yeah I think Hield would be a great bench piece for that sort of money. Or could have Castle come off the bench.
Lakers now going after Kuzma
Hield was unplayable against the Knicks.
He'd be a decent traffic cone that hits 3s for the regular season, but then we could've just kept Doug.
Kings sub is fun to read right now. They think Hield signing with GSW is hilarious.
What about Ingram?
He's not mentioned in connection to the Spurs.
He's a versatile scorer, and a solid playmaker to boot.
And the price wouldn't be that high.
WTF? Why are you benching Vassell in favour of Hield?
Oh, ok.I had a brain fart tbh, definitely starting Vassell over Hield
I doubt it too
But that would be a great fit, energy off the bench and mentoring 2nd unit while CP3 takes care of the 1st
I'd give him 2years +30M to convince him
Not sure DDR can get more elsewhere
It's all about PATFO being able to convince him regading the role, it could offer him a nice career ending if he's smart.
15 million per year is MLE money. He refuses to sign with teams cause he wants more, probably around 25 million which is close to what he earned on the Bulls. We can offer him that, but I'd only sign him for one year. DeRozan doesn't make sense at all. If we trade for Markkanen, give me DeRozan for a year so we can make a deep playoff run and then workout a sign and trade next offseason where we get some assets back.
That would be the idea. Same idea than cp3
Short term deals a little above narket that can be traded, both side have something to gain out of it and keep some freedom if the exp is a failure.
With or without Lauri, it'd make a lot of sense imo
Another interesting target. What y‘all saying?
Man if people hate Trae, Garland and Lauri, they're really gonna hate Simons
He'd be an interesting 6th man if we shipped out Keldon to get Lauri, IMO.
Agree - great for a 6th man and better than Keldon for SA due to 3Ball and ability to play “PG” in a pinch. Could maybe start if CP3 wasn’t here unlike Keldon due to 3 ball etc…but not someone I rate super highlyMan if people hate Trae, Garland and Lauri, they're really gonna hate Simons
He'd be an interesting 6th man if we shipped out Keldon to get Lauri, IMO.
Passing on Dillingham seems a sign that they don't value that type of small no-defense scorer.
Can we get Brook Lopez guys?
We need additional frontcourt guys
6'3'' with a 6'7'' wingspan ain't exactly small for a PG
164 pounds though, and he had a 6'3 wingspan
He’s talking about Simons
I'm talking about Simons not Dillingham
I guess Spurs and Heat are talking
There have been Heat trade discussions with teams - including one with substantial cap space - though further details are unclear. One of the sources said Miami also wants to see what good players become available in the trade market in the days and weeks ahead.”
My bad, carry on.
I'd bet he's on PATFO's list, but what order of priority...
We'll know better arround the 8th when Graham's contract's extention kicks
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
