I like that, thanks Chinook. Assuming that the halves are identical, that's 6 min/game of last year's closing lineup (which is a considerable increase over what they averaged last year) + another 6 min/game of functionally the same lineup but with Paul in for Tre. It would be fascinating to compare and contrast those two lineups, though it wouldn't control for the situational variance you point out. It would also be nice if we could see Wemby and Vassell put in 34 mpg on a regular basis, but my guess is that that will trim back some.
The only glaring issue I see is a 7-min stretch at the end of the first and the start of the 2nd where our defense would be quite suspect and worrisome. The start of the second concerns would be significantly mitigated if Castle starts out the defender we hope right out of the gates, but it's probably fair to assume a little bit of an assimilation struggle to start his career. Frankly, I'm not sure we can afford to go prolonged stretches without one of Wemby or Sochan on the floor. A swap for Collins for Lopez (which is off the table now without the cap room) would have majorly alleviated this, as would a swap of Collins for a healthy, one-year-more developed Bassey, which injury I'm afraid has robbed us of (and Bassey may very well be gone).

Reply With Quote
I know Pop will (hopefully) stagger things + those guys will be going up against other teams’ weak benches a lot too, but geez. That lineup just looks so underwhelming from a shooting/defense standpoint. Guess it’s an improvement over last year at least.
