Page 52 of 93 FirstFirst ... 24248495051525354555662 ... LastLast
Results 1,276 to 1,300 of 2319
  1. #1276
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    If he extends, he puts his exit timeline in Ainges hands, not his own. He’s allegedly not thrilled with the last two years, and they'll have to tank again, since they have no franchise player. If they win the 2025 lottery, they’ll suck for another year after that. So, maybe they start being not terrible when he’s 29?
    I heard that the Utah strip joints are world class. They just have to get someone to manually spin the pole while the dancer is on it.

  2. #1277
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    If it did, that would be all the more reason for Markkanen to work to scuttle any trade. His best and maybe only chance to reach the max would be with Utah.
    So yes, the CBA explicitly bans trades for six months after a renegotiation and bans renegotiatons for sixth months after trades with no exceptions

    Markkanen is only at risk of losing the renegotiate salary this year. He's not at risk of losing a max next year. Anyone who trades for him would be willing to max him unless we reach a point where no one wants him and a team takes him as a pure rental for cheap.

  3. #1278
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    So yes, the CBA explicitly bans trades for six months after a renegotiation and bans renegotiatons for sixth months after trades with no exceptions

    Markkanen is only at risk of losing the renegotiate salary this year. He's not at risk of losing a max next year. Anyone who trades for him would be willing to max him unless we reach a point where no one wants him and a team takes him as a pure rental for cheap.
    Teams might be willing to max him, but doesn’t that 40% limit apply unless teams have the cap space?

  4. #1279
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Teams might be willing to max him, but doesn’t that 40% limit apply unless teams have the cap space?
    IIRC, the 40% only applies to extensions - any team can sign him to the max if they have the cap space and any team can re-sign him to a bigger max with Bird rights if they trade for him now. So in that respect, it benefits him to be traded now rather than waiting to be a FA.

  5. #1280
    Remember Cherokee Parks The Truth #6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    6,911
    Big picture, can the FO still trade for LM after this latest trade? I'm trying to see the forest and not the trees, so to speak.

  6. #1281
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Big picture, can the FO still trade for LM after this latest trade? I'm trying to see the forest and not the trees, so to speak.
    Yes. Pretty much everyone who was previously reportedly interested in Lauri can still go after him. His salary is easy to match. In theory, even the Kings could probably make it work somehow if they really wanted (though they probably don't).

    The main change for the Spurs is that now they'd definitely have to send out enough salary whereas before they could send out less and absorb the difference into space.

  7. #1282
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Big picture, can the FO still trade for LM after this latest trade? I'm trying to see the forest and not the trees, so to speak.
    Yeah, but they'd have to either send Keldon or Collins out to match salary. Which I expected them to do all along if they made a Markannen trade anyways.

  8. #1283
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Ya - I highly doubt sa was not going to send out players anyways, and even if that was the case there’s teams like DET more than willing to take salary for draft comp

  9. #1284
    Remember Cherokee Parks The Truth #6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    6,911
    Thanks for the succinct answers. I know I'm late to the party here, and don't follow the subtle nuances of Jazz basketball, but as a team rebuilding why would the Jazz not want to make him part of their future plans?

  10. #1285
    Veteran SpursFan86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    5,159
    Thanks for the succinct answers. I know I'm late to the party here, and don't follow the subtle nuances of Jazz basketball, but as a team rebuilding why would the Jazz not want to make him part of their future plans?
    If they’re concerned that he’s unhappy in Utah and may look to jump ship to go somewhere else next offseason, now is their chance to get a good haul of assets in return. The timing is especially good because the upcoming 2025 draft is considered to be extremely strong. If there’s a year to tank and have multiple shots in the draft then 2025 is a good year to do it.

  11. #1286
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Thanks for the succinct answers. I know I'm late to the party here, and don't follow the subtle nuances of Jazz basketball, but as a team rebuilding why would the Jazz not want to make him part of their future plans?
    He's not really a lead star, he's already 27. Not really a player to build around. The Jazz have so little talent that tearing down to the studs is the way to go.

  12. #1287
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Thanks for the succinct answers. I know I'm late to the party here, and don't follow the subtle nuances of Jazz basketball, but as a team rebuilding why would the Jazz not want to make him part of their future plans?
    They certainly want him. The question is, does he want them?

  13. #1288
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Thanks for the succinct answers. I know I'm late to the party here, and don't follow the subtle nuances of Jazz basketball, but as a team rebuilding why would the Jazz not want to make him part of their future plans?
    At least so far, he's raised their floor to a place that prevents them from doing what they really need to do, which is bottom out for their future star. He's kind of like DDR and DJM were for us, bouying them to 30+ win seasons when they need a 15-win season. His first year in Utah, in particular, was interesting because that was the Wemby year and they were a pre-season favorite for one of the worst teams in the league, then Lauri broke out and had them in play-in contention before they shut him down for the year.

  14. #1289
    Believe. @ByndExistnz
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Post Count
    869
    At least so far, he's raised their floor to a place that prevents them from doing what they really need to do, which is bottom out for their future star. He's kind of like DDR and DJM were for us, bouying them to 30+ win seasons when they need a 15-win season. His first year in Utah, in particular, was interesting because that was the Wemby year and they were a pre-season favorite for one of the worst teams in the league, then Lauri broke out and had them in play-in contention before they shut him down for the year.
    Also I haven’t seen this mentioned here. Lauri was sat games many times in the last two years and reportedly he has said he refuses to tank any more. So if Utah does want to tank then it’s quite possible he refuses to sign with them which would really kill Utahs leverage. I think it’s highly likely he is traded before August 6th or whatever his deadline to sign is. In fact I’m sure it’s comfortably before that.

  15. #1290
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    Also I haven’t seen this mentioned here. Lauri was sat games many times in the last two years and reportedly he has said he refuses to tank any more. So if Utah does want to tank then it’s quite possible he refuses to sign with them which would really kill Utahs leverage. I think it’s highly likely he is traded before August 6th or whatever his deadline to sign is. In fact I’m sure it’s comfortably before that.
    I mentioned it many times. He publicly said he'd like to stay in Utah and compete.
    He wasn't happy after they shut him down for no reason.

    In his two seasons in Utah, their win percentage is 46% with him and 32% without him.

  16. #1291
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Also I haven’t seen this mentioned here. Lauri was sat games many times in the last two years and reportedly he has said he refuses to tank any more. So if Utah does want to tank then it’s quite possible he refuses to sign with them which would really kill Utahs leverage. I think it’s highly likely he is traded before August 6th or whatever his deadline to sign is. In fact I’m sure it’s comfortably before that.
    I agree - gaming this all out, I'm convinced that Ainge/Zanik know they need to move Lauri, they're just trying to squeeze every last drop from suitors. It's not in Utah's best long-term interest to extend him. And the gig is up as soon as Aug 6 comes around because then a threat (extending with Utah) will get taken off the board. I'd expect him to get dealt as we get closer to the 6th.

  17. #1292
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    643
    Playing around with a three team Jazz/Spurs/Pistons deal with the Jazz saving about 18M over two years in addition to getting picks.

    Spurs Get:
    Lauri 18M
    John Collins 26M

    Jazz Get:
    Zollins 16M
    Evan Fournier 19M expiring
    One of the ATL picks
    2030 Swaps
    2031 Minny pick

    Pistion Get:
    Keldon 19M

    Fournier and Lauri's deals cancel out but Zollins makes about 18M less than John Collins over the next two years. Sure JC is the better player but the Jazz would be tanking anyway and a 18M cash savings would be pretty nice in addition to the picks. Pistons get Keldon for free and cant complain.

  18. #1293
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Playing around with a three team Jazz/Spurs/Pistons deal with the Jazz saving about 18M over two years in addition to getting picks.

    Spurs Get:
    Lauri 18M
    John Collins 26M

    Jazz Get:
    Zollins 16M
    Evan Fournier 19M expiring
    One of the ATL picks
    2030 Swaps
    2031 Minny pick

    Pistion Get:
    Keldon 19M

    Fournier and Lauri's deals cancel out but Zollins makes about 18M less than John Collins over the next two years. Sure JC is the better player but the Jazz would be tanking anyway and a 18M cash savings would be pretty nice in addition to the picks. Pistons get Keldon for free and cant complain.
    you have the spurs unloading 35m of salary but getting back 44

    we dont have cap room, so salaries have to match

    also fournier's option was declined and he is currently a free agent

  19. #1294
    Remember kobyz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    4,406
    Playing around with a three team Jazz/Spurs/Pistons deal with the Jazz saving about 18M over two years in addition to getting picks.

    Spurs Get:
    Lauri 18M
    John Collins 26M

    Jazz Get:
    Zollins 16M
    Evan Fournier 19M expiring
    One of the ATL picks
    2030 Swaps
    2031 Minny pick

    Pistion Get:
    Keldon 19M

    Fournier and Lauri's deals cancel out but Zollins makes about 18M less than John Collins over the next two years. Sure JC is the better player but the Jazz would be tanking anyway and a 18M cash savings would be pretty nice in addition to the picks. Pistons get Keldon for free and cant complain.
    Spurs should not gift even one lottery pick in a trade for Lauri, Spurs left as the only team in his running, with Warriors after latest moves won't trade for him as they'll reach the second apron, and even before you couldn't see Lauri agree to sign extension there

  20. #1295
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Spurs should not gift even one lottery pick in a trade for Lauri, Spurs left as the only team in his running, with Warriors after latest moves won't trade for him as they'll reach the second apron, and even before you couldn't see Lauri agree to sign extension there
    Not that I necessarily disagree with your logic - but the Warriors are not out of the running. It's an easy move for the Warriors if they send out Wiggins + draft capital.

  21. #1296
    Remember kobyz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    4,406
    Not that I necessarily disagree with your logic - but the Warriors are not out of the running. It's an easy move for the Warriors if they send out Wiggins + draft capital.
    they doesn't have enough draft capitals to make Utah take Wiggins while also giving them Lauri, and Markannen doesn't make sense for warriors after their latest moves

  22. #1297
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    995
    Spurs should not gift even one lottery pick in a trade for Lauri, Spurs left as the only team in his running, with Warriors after latest moves won't trade for him as they'll reach the second apron, and even before you couldn't see Lauri agree to sign extension there
    Fully agree. No way the FO give up that much for a player that still needs to be maxed out. And no way Spurs want Collins (not that this trade works as others have side w/Spurs not having cap space for both players), especially when they could have gotten him dirt cheap a year or so ago.

  23. #1298
    Remember kobyz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    4,406
    .

  24. #1299
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    they doesn't have enough draft capitals to make Utah take Wiggins while also giving them Lauri, and Markannen doesn't make sense for warriors after their latest moves
    I don't agree, but I hope you are right... because that is where the Spurs have an opportunity to swoop in.

  25. #1300
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    643
    Fully agree. No way the FO give up that much for a player that still needs to be maxed out. And no way Spurs want Collins (not that this trade works as others have side w/Spurs not having cap space for both players), especially when they could have gotten him dirt cheap a year or so ago.
    With Keldon and Zollins getting sent out the Spurs could take on JC without being anywhere near the luxury tax. People are too fixated with cap space. If the Spurs add Lauri cap space is a thing of the past especially when Wemby gets paid.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •