Reply With Quote
my man is gonna be playing for JJ Re very soon.
my man is gonna be playing for JJ Re very soon.
id be willing to wager you've used theThat's so ed.
I don't know the Clippers salary situation, but I'd like Trent Jr. to go there if possible. Don't want OKC to keep making bank on their incompetence.
I don't think Trent is moving the needle regardless if Nephew can't even play half the season tbh.
I'm with you there, I'd rather the Clippers over the Lakers if he's going to LA. Do not want OKC getting more lottery picks.
Am I the only one who had to do a double take thinking that this was actually Patty Mills?
Nah, I did the same thing
I would love Trent on a one year rental but I don't think this is where he'd want to come.
If you haven't yet tuned into Paul George's latest pod, give it a listen.
https://www.youtube.com/@podcastpshow
He goes in depth about the behind-the-scenes negotiations and the gradual breakdown of talks between he and the Clips. It's a pretty fascinating peak behind the curtain into FA negotiations (and frankly what not to do).
I think ultimately Utah does a bunch of nothing and goes nowhere the whole time Ainge is in the front office because of this. In today's nba teams are only willing to give up a ton for players that they really want for specific reasons and not just give up a ton for a great player. Lauri's trade market isn't really that hot and 2 of the 3 teams, GS and Sac, have already just moved on to sign other players. That Utah rebuild is going to go from year 2 to year 5 and all they going to have to show for it is Lauri making 44 million that season.
We all know GS ain't going to do anything they NOT going to throw draft capital for Lauri - They know Steph is old they will just build out a team that is semi completive and it's not like they can make a deep run with Curry being 37 by the time playoffs start.
Any team that really needs him just does not have the draft picks that Ainge is going to want and crappy teams are not going to give away multiple unprotected picks for just a very good player
Angie is overrated. Kudos on Tatum and Brown, but also on being that bad that you could pick top 3 in successive years. And the “genius” move to trade back to get Tatum for a pick that turned out to be Langord.
All return on all this fabled assets he collected was pretty meh honestly:
https://www.boston.com/sports/boston...t-picks/?amp=1
What time does Bassey clear waivers?
So, 4 AM tomorrow?This means the waiver will process at the next waiver processing that is at least a full 24 hours (1 day) later. So, if you drop a player at 8 p.m. ET on Thursday, your waiver will run on or about 4 a.m. ET Saturday - the next scheduled running of waivers that is at least 24 hours past the time the player was dropped.
Thanks ex.
That’s a fake account I think ace
Crap, thanks for the heads up.
ATL can match it right? I know he’s injured but that’s a steal if ATL lets him go.
That’s a good move for the Wizards if ATL doesn’t match. It’s very much a Zollins-like prove it deal, though this one is much cheaper in terms of cap allocation. You’d think ATL would match this, because dang that’s cheap.
There’s nothing to match. He was unrestricted.
He took advantage of the Nets' horrible GM at the time, dumping the corpses of Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett for a ransom, like stealing from a leper. The rest of his reputation is based off the deals he got for Gobert and Mitc although those hauls might be just okay if they stay in the playoffs. He has a reputation for being very difficult to work with, which isn't a great thing in professional sports when the object is to be someone good to work with. The Spurs have great relationships with multiple franchises, for example.
not sure about this, but isn't the 7 Million the number that would have pushed the Hawks over the 1st apron?
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions
