Reply With Quote
Wisconsin fake electors settle, agree to cooperate with DOJ
Nevada
https://thenevadaindependent.com/art...-2020-electionA Nevada grand jury has indicted the six Republicans — including the chair of the Nevada Republican Party — who falsely pledged Nevada’s electoral votes to Donald Trump following the 2020 election despite President Joe Biden’s victory in the state.
Attorney General Aaron Ford, a Democrat, announced the indictments Wednesday of state party chair Michael McDonald, national committeeman Jim DeGraffenreid, Clark County Republican Party chair Jesse Law (who announced plans to run for state Assembly on Wednesday), state party vice chair Jim Hindle III, Shawn Meehan and Eileen Rice.
In a press release, the attorney general’s office said all six individuals had been indicted on two felony charges — offering a false instrument for filing and uttering a forged instrument by submitting fraudulent do ents to state and federal officials. The charges carry penalties of category C and D felonies, respectively, with punishments up to a maximum of four and five years in prison and a minimum of one year in prison. A grand jury in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County indicted the six Republicans.
Wisconsin fake electors settle, agree to cooperate with DOJ
the first conviction is a misdemeanor plea bargain, seventeen others are charged in this AZ case
linkA Republican activist who signed a do ent falsely claiming former President Donald Trump had won Arizona in the 2020 election became the first person to be convicted in the state's fake elector case.Loraine Pellegrino, a former president of the group Ahwatukee Republican Women, has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of filing a false do ent, Arizona Attorney General's Office spokesperson Richie Taylor said Tuesday, declining to comment further. Records do enting her guilty plea have not yet been posted by the court. Still, court records show Pellegrino was sentenced to unsupervised probation. Before the plea, she faced nine felony charges.
Seventeen other people had been charged in the case, including 10 other Republicans who had signed a certificate saying they were "duly elected and qualified" electors and claimed Trump had carried Arizona in the 2020 election. President Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes. Joshua Kolsrud, an attorney representing Pellegrino, said in a statement that his client has accepted responsibility for her actions.
"Loraine Pellegrino's decision to accept a plea to a lesser charge reflects her desire to move forward and put this matter behind her," Kolsrud said.
On Monday, former Trump's campaign attorney Jenna Ellis, who worked closely with his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, entered a cooperation agreement with prosecutors who have asked for her charges to be dismissed. The remaining defendants, including Giuliani and Trump presidential chief of staff Mark Meadows, have pleaded not guilty to conspiracy, fraud and forgery charges.
Is this another case that Orange Kunt can simply appeal to the Supreme Kommunist Kourt?
echoes of the election of 1876
United States presidential election of 1876 | Tilden vs. Hayes, Electoral Crisis, Compromise, & Results | Britannica
Electoral Count Act - WikipediaThe Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA) (Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 49–90, 24 Stat. 373,[1] later codified at le 3, Chapter 1[2]) is a United States federal law that added to procedures set out in the Cons ution of the United States for the counting of electoral votes following a presidential election. In its unamended form, it last governed at the time of the 2021 United States Electoral College vote count. The Act has since been substantially amended by the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022.
The Act was enacted by Congress in 1887, ten years after the disputed 1876 presidential election, in which several states submitted competing slates of electors and a divided Congress was unable to resolve the deadlock for weeks.[3] Close elections in 1880 and 1884 followed, and again raised the possibility that with no formally established counting procedure in place, partisans in Congress might use the counting process to force a desired result.[4]
The Act aimed to minimize congressional involvement in election disputes, instead placing the primary responsibility to resolve disputes upon the states.[4][5] The Act set out procedures and deadlines for the states to follow in resolving disputes, certifying results, and sending the results to Congress. If a state followed these "safe harbor" standards and the state's governor properly submitted one set of electoral votes, the Act stated that this "final" determination "shall govern."[6][7] However, making or use of "any false writing or do ent" in the implementation of this procedure was a felony punishable by 5 years imprisonment by 18 U.S. Code 1001 under Chapter 47 Fraud and False Statements.
Trump isn't charged in this one at the request of the prosecutors, but Mark Meadows and Rudy are. Jenna Ellis flipped.
How about the Chutkan one?
the J6 election interference case?
oh yeah, but they're saying that one won't conclude before the election
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
