Reply With Quote
Nick Wrong back at it again
Nick Wrong back at it again
Including Vassell is a deal breaker, tbh.
And we keep our 25 picks! This is probably in the works which is why we got the Christmas game. Just waiting for the guys to return to hime after the Olympics. Can this thread get to 90 pages before then?
must be related to BrianNick Wrong back at it again
No way in they'd taint their legacy to prop up Wemby's... NEXT...
Only if Kerr throws in a weekend trip to Sonoma
Give me Lebrun over Lebron...He is only 17 years old...suits Wembys timeline way better.
That said don't give me Alexis...I want Felix or both of them.
Do it, Mitch.
Include Bronny and it’s a yes from me dawg
Just cancel the season and award the le to the Spurs, why don't ya?
You want to put a contender around Wemby? That's how you do it, not spending a ton of Markkanen. Now of course, nobody is going to actually do this. Lebron isn't leaving his son, for example, and the Spurs aren't paying nearly enough. But if Curry ever came available, the Spurs should definitely being beating down the door trying to close that deal.
I mean somebody has to coach and GM this team. Might as well be Lebron
Not willing to give up Cissoko
Also don't want to give up that 27 DAL FRP that we don't have
What I love about this is that obviously they ran this segment long enough to correct it, or multiple times... and no one stopped to think "maybe its time we go to commercial"
Lebron and curry are bad influences on wemby. Sub in Malaki for Vassell and lakers throwing in their 20131 unprotected first and we may talk.
If they say we own that DAL '27 pick, it's officially ours now, isn't it?
obvs a joke but can Barnes even be traded yet anyway? Not sure about the rules there honestly
Two things: he came alone in the trade, and he was traded into cap room. I believe either of those allow him to be traded again. Can’t imagine the Spurs doing that after asking him to waive his NTC in his trade here, but it’s technically possible.
This trade will get Spurs into the west conference finals at best, then back into 7th or 8th for at least two more years. So, pass.
Wasn’t a no trade clause, it was a trade kicker/bonus. Basically we still could have traded for him but would have required waiving Champagnie
You are correct,but my thought of them not doing him dirty was also correct.
Another ridiculous “Buzz” thread.
If this was a real thing and Vassell the deal breaker this would be so dumb.Including Vassell is a deal breaker, tbh.
No thanks
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
