Reply With Quote
Some have actually begun to realize that they're cooked, and those pathetic displays are their death rattle.
Weird copium from the right these days.
Some have actually begun to realize that they're cooked, and those pathetic displays are their death rattle.
Andproclaiming the poll impact of the DNC less than 24 hours from its end.
Keep huffing that copium.
"convention bump"
Did any of you regressives attend? I hope yall got your vasectomies and had abortions out of your bussy's!
No bounce ducks was right
"convention bump"
Stock market is soaring!!!!
USA USA USA
Well the good thing is that you still have the RNC coming up to get a good surge for Trump
Oh no, please don't dominate the news cycle with the worm brained conspiracy theorist who was vehemently anti-Trump less than 2 years ago, that would be terrible for Democrats.
And
Keep huffing that copium.
lol
"convention bounce"
TSA bored waiting for a fun new conspiracy theory to obsess over.
How many times are you going to respond to that post from 4 days ago? Rent free much?"convention bounce"
I don't care about polls in August, especially national ones... but if I did, I'd look at aggregates instead of popping in to copium-respond with cherry picked polls.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...2024/national/
Harris averaged +2.4% in August polls before the DNC
She averaged +4.4% in polls during the DNC
She has averaged +2.6% in polls following RFKJ's lapdog act.
Don't act like "Trump slightly losing ground" was the scenario you envisioned when you posted this:
No convention bump and then RFK endorses Trump taking over the news cycle.
I responded twice to that post and responded when polls started coming out. Too many here throw out rent free without having a ing clue how it’s used.
The scenario I envisioned when I said no convention bump was….wait for it…no convention bump.
Did anyone say otherwise?I responded twice to that post and responded when polls started coming out. Too many here throw out rent free without having a ing clue how it’s used.
The scenario I envisioned when I said no convention bump was….wait for it…no convention bump.
Yeah, the Harris bump was Harris' becoming the candidate.
Don't worry, TSA -- when you lose a few states will refuse to send delegates and the House will declare Trump king.
And you'll cheer the entire way.
You've responded three times to the same post, including coming back four days after to respond twice. It's a perfect example of rent free.
That link is a list of polls. Do you dispute the existence of any of those polls?
More hilariously, do you realize you posted Nate Silver / 538 data on this page of this thread in one of your rent-free replies to my post from four days ago?Trump fanboying has really made you re ed.
So then you're saying the RFK Jr endorsement had no impact? Given that the current result is basically flat, you're either wrong about RFK making a difference, or wrong about the convention bump. You can't be right about both, and snark doesn't make you sound smarter.The scenario I envisioned when I said no convention bump was….wait for it…no convention bump.
Got to love the shifting goal posts over stuff that doesn't even matter. Some people are just desperate for perceived W's, even to the point of laughing off sources they used minutes before. Poor fella.
All three responses were today dip , and all three responses came after the polls came out.You've responded three times to the same post, including coming back four days after to respond twice. It's a perfect example of rent free.
That link is a list of polls. Do you dispute the existence of any of those polls?
More hilariously, do you realize you posted Nate Silver / 538 data on this page of this thread in one of your rent-free replies to my post from four days ago?
So then you're saying the RFK Jr endorsement had no impact? Given that the current result is basically flat, you're either wrong about RFK making a difference, or wrong about the convention bump. You can't be right about both, and snark doesn't make you sound smarter.
More hilariously, do you realize the Nate Silver data I linked is not tied to the 538 data you linked? The 538 data you linked is now owned by ABC (lol Kaplan!) and isn’t the same model Nate Silver runs. Nate Silver talks on the 538 model put out by ABC. bolding to try and make a point and call someone re ed while actually highlighting how re ed you are
RFK Jr didn’t drop out in every state. So yes I’m right about RFK Jr making a difference and yes I’m right about there being no convention bump for Harris.
Corky doubling down, poor fella.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
