Here is the survey in question...I haven't been able to find the cross tabs but the question was asked and 17% said yes.
https://justthenews.com/sites/defaul...%20Attempt.pdf
Georgia woman died after not receiving timely medical care due to the state's restrictive abortion law, investigative journalism site ProPublica reports.
https://www.newsweek.com/amber-thurm...eorgia-1954945
So Harris is still lying !
Here is the survey in question...I haven't been able to find the cross tabs but the question was asked and 17% said yes.
https://justthenews.com/sites/defaul...%20Attempt.pdf
Harris was to chicken to agree
Had to do the 10 one before she would agree to anything
still triggered
butthurt projection
So Harris never visits their so no harm to her
It would save more lives !
Why many die trying to cross in the heat, trip and many rape, murder woman on way and when they get in USA
Pretending you're not a massive liar spreading bull
I am indeed triggered by your overt racism here.
You got me.
Well they're black Haitians, so I gotta believe they're probably eating geese and cats and dogs. I saw it on the internets.
ducks and TSA are disappointed that Miss Sassy is alive and well.
I'd say no since I have no idea what point shift you're referring to.
I'm not talking about just the geese. You're just straight up triggeredPERIOD. You have been flailing around the board 24/7 responding to everyone and everything...including ducksYou have been quoting me begging for my attention for the past week refusing to discuss what you quoted me on and instead bringing up unrelated from almost 10 years ago in an attempt to trying to deflect from the topic of the thread and derail it. When I don't respond to your off topic questions in your attempt to derail the thread you try and declare victory and call me a pussy. Such a weak attempt. It's such a pathetic shtick and it's an obvious tell when you're flustered, flailing, and in a tailspin.
What are you talking about? What more is there than your precious reports?
I've been asking you what made you stop believing in the previous moral panics you bought into 100%.
It's relevant.
And you've been ignoring your own history of 100% belief in those moral panics.
Why?
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 09-19-2024 at 01:23 PM.
Why do you lie?
She broke Yam s, made him say "No mas," spanish is your first language, you should know what that means, plain and simple, or are you too low iq and also suck at spanish?
What am I talking about? I'm talking about the part you just edited out when you quoted me, pussy.
I'm talking about how you are just straight up triggeredPERIOD. You have been flailing around the board 24/7 responding to everyone and everything...including ducks You have been quoting me begging for my attention for the past week refusing to discuss what you quoted me on and instead bringing up unrelated from almost 10 years ago in an attempt to trying to deflect from the topic of the thread and derail it. When I don't respond to your off topic questions in your attempt to derail the thread you try and declare victory and call me a pussy. Such a weak attempt. It's such a pathetic shtick and it's an obvious tell when you're flustered, flailing, and in a tailspin.
It's relevant?You are such a lying disingenuous piece of .
Let's take a look at "it's relevant".
I post about the 9 point shift in Party ID and you quote me and ask about Haitians eating cats and dogs...."it's relevant"
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...04095&page=182
I post about the Teamsters not endorsing a Dem candidate like they've done for the last 6 elections and you quote me and ask me child sex dungeons..."it's relevant"
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...1#post11125717
"It's relevant"![]()
The site is ing up and won't let me load anything past the first page of my quotes to post more and I'm not going back thread by thread and page by page to prove my point more. I know there are plenty more examples and so do you. Get a new shtick pussy.
So, nothing about Haitians eating animals other than your racist su ion and uncorroborated "reports"?
That was my question.
And your moral panic history -- but you've shut the up about those forever.
Your new shtick is endorsements and poll accuracy.
Along with a racist moral panic.
It's relevant.
YOU CAN'T PROVE THEY DIDN'T EAT THE CATS OR THE DOGS OR THE PETS
The fact that this rube hasn't seen his own pattern of swallowing whatever moral panic that's fed to him just proves he's a rube.
AND THEY'RE BLACK HAITIANS THEREFORE IT'S TRUE
I post about the 9 point shift in Party ID and you quote me and ask about Haitians eating cats and dogs.
Explain how your question is relevant to the shift in Party ID.
I post about the Teamsters not endorsing a Dem candidate like they've done for the last 6 elections and you quote me and ask me child sex dungeons.
Explain how your question is relevant to the Teamsters not endorsing a Dem candidate like they've done for decades.
You've been posting about Haitians eating dogs for a week.
It's relevant to your history of swallowing and amplifying moral panics over the last decade.I post about the Teamsters not endorsing a Dem candidate like they've done for the last 6 elections and you quote me and ask me child sex dungeons.
Explain how your question is relevant to the Teamsters not endorsing a Dem candidate like they've done for decades.
"Black Haitians ate muh pet" is the latest moral panic you have swallowed and are currently amplifying on this board.
You want me to say I'm worried about your little stories about Teamsters and party affiliation.
I'm not worried about your little stories.
I'm always worried that rubes like you and outright bad racist people like you might well elect Trump again. The authoritarian impulse that you and other Trump s embrace is nothing new in this country. I hope we can stop you as Americans have done in the past. I'm not optimistic in part because of the way you rubes/bad racists use moral panics like your current one that you suddenly don't want to talk about. This is the kind of thing that effects the little stories you're posting. The end result is going to be authoritarianism or not. We'll have to see.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 09-19-2024 at 02:44 PM.
So...not relevant at all. Why do you lie and say it's relevant?
So...not relevant at all. Why do you lie and say it's relevant?
And these were just the two most recent examples from this thread. You've been in a triggered tailspin doing this in every thread I post in. You're pathetic.
Nice dodge.
I can see you're just going to stonewall about your embrace of authoritarianism and moral panics to achieve that authoritarianism.
I'm sorry, that's the real issue here.
It's relevant to everything you post here.
Your little stories about party affiliation polls and endorsements are symptoms, not the root of your beliefs. I wanted to ask you about those but it's too much for you.
I told you I'm not worried about those little stories. I'm more worried about rubes and authoritarians.
If you don't want to talk about your political beliefs and want to concentrate on little horserace tidbits, why did you spend all that time posting about Haitians eating pets?
You aren't worried about the stories yet you quote them, don't address them, and then ask completely irrelevant questions that have nothing to do the stories to try and derail the conversation into something else. But yeah sure you've convinced me they don't worry you.
"all that time". You can't stop lying. I posted like 5 times about it and of those posts a few of them came from grabbing tweets from replies to the tweet you posted.
"all that time"
"it's relevant"
Get a new shtick dude, and stop lying so much.
I explicitly told you what I'm worried about: Rubes/racists like you turning this country towards authoritarianism. I can't make it any more clear.
So you just refuse to talk about Haitians eating dogs going forward? Another moral panic discarded?"all that time". You can't stop lying. I posted like 5 times about it and of those posts a few of them came from grabbing tweets from replies to the tweet you posted.
"all that time"
"it's relevant"
Get a new shtick dude, and stop lying so much.
This is why I'm asking you about you and your moral panics -- you adopt them and amplify them and then it seems when you feel sufficiently embarrassed by them you completely disavow them and won't talk about them anymore. Indeed, you try to ridicule other people for bringing up your moral panics. I understand the impulse because it has to be very embarrassing for you, but you did defend this latest moral panic however briefly you want to characterize it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)