Reply With Quote
Trollioio
Trollioio
It's your term. What do you mean by "sexualizing" small children?
lmao, high schoolers = "small children"... gays and trans textbooks = "sexualize"... completely skirts the "inappropriate" question, which is entirely key to this discussion....
today's conserva s
lmao, high schoolers = "small children"... gays and trans textbooks = "sexualize"... completely skirts the "inappropriate" question, which is entirely key to this discussion....
And here you are,,,once again,,,bashing republicans but you never seem to have these type of posts against democrat supporters on here,,,,,but you claim to be an Independent,,,,,,LMAO. Tell me, NoNo,,,,,whats today's demo s if youre so unbiased,,,,,,
I'm not bashing republicans, I'm bashing conservatives... if they were really worried about pedos, they would stop sending kids to Christian churches, tbh...
lmao, high schoolers = "small children"... gays and trans textbooks = "sexualize"... completely skirts the "inappropriate" question, which is entirely key to this discussion....
Tell that to atheist BlaKKKe who spends $ sending his daughter to Catholic School.
Nono plays stupid on purpose
I'll tell it to whomever wants to listen, tbh. Nothing more dangerous than priest loose in kindergarten, tbhTell that to atheist BlaKKKe who spends $ sending his daughter to Catholic School.
I didn't send my daughter to a Catholic school. I've never said Catholic school. But then Kori walked out of 10th grade so..
Tell that to Anthony Weiner and the rest of the Dem party tbh.
I don't necessarily think you're a groomer per say but you're teetering on the line playing coy that those sick books are only in High School libraries, they shouldn't even be in those libraries either. Advocating for such nonsense is sickening but then again you're in Silicon Degen Valley so...
How is a book that nobody is obligated to read "grooming" anybody? This is the stupidest thing ever. What's next? Can't take high schoolers to see historical statues of naked men or women?
Not to mention, in this day and age, most high schoolers have full access to porn and if you didn't get at least a blowjob by that age it's probably because you're a giant loser.
Old enough to carry a gun or drive a car, but not old enough to read about same sex couples or transves es?
80 years ago, the "degenerates" were white men marrying black women. It's like we didn't learn anything about the moral police.
Again, you seem to think these books are only in High School libraries. Nice swerve!
As for sex related anything, yeah none of us are in denial that teens experiment and some are actually sexual but that doesn't change the fact there's already laws prohibiting such content to minors.
In this day and age, show me teens who are old enough to carry a gun. I'll wait for you answer... As for driving, is it still at 16? I wouldn't know.
Those pushing sexual content on our youth are degens and more than likely worse. Keep running cover due to your ideology of bull .
Who is pushing sexual content in *library books* on "our" youth?
You brought up high school, I didn't. Here's a quote:
I don't know any grade school or middle school making reading sexual content mandatory. I mean, outside of biology class examining sex in frogs and .
Also, nice swerve not answering the question. How is a book that nobody is obligated to read "grooming" anybody?
You can enlist in the Army at 17 years old. You can get an LTC in Texas if you're 18 (in some cir stances). 16 year old to drive.
Can you cite the laws you mention that allow outright banning of books in libraries? Because once the banning took place, it's unavailable regardless of any age. That is my point and why it's uncons utional.
And how about you let parents educate their children on what they should be reading or not reading, instead of playing the moral/ideology police?
Bold the other school grades while you're at it or take you degenerate ways back to your home country bro.
As well, your argument is null tbh. You're clearly arguing for "love is love" at this point... Maybe you are a groomer, maybe a card carrying NAMBLA member too, who knows at this point?
Joey folds.
Talk about swerveBold the other school grades while you're at it or take you degenerate ways back to your home country bro.
As well, your argument is null tbh. You're clearly arguing for "love is love" at this point... Maybe you are a groomer, maybe a card carrying NAMBLA member too, who knows at this point?
I addressed the other school grades, it's right there, you just chose to ignore it, like the question you've been dodging for two posts in a row now, and clearly won't address since you already know the answer.
You my guy Joey, but in this thread you've been a walking contradiction. There's no "hate speech" because you want the freedumb to say horrible things, but once the "lefties" talk about trannies or same sex couples, they're "sexualizing" and must be forcefully silenced by the government.
Typical conserva argument, tbh
Talk about swerve
I addressed the other school grades, it's right there, you just chose to ignore it, like the question you've been dodging for two posts in a row now, and clearly won't address since you already know the answer.
You my guy Joey, but in this thread you've been a walking contradiction. There's no "hate speech" because you want the freedumb to say horrible things, but once the "lefties" talk about trannies or same sex couples, they're "sexualizing" and must be forcefully silenced by the government.
Typical conserva argument, tbh
Werent you democrat dumb s calling republicans a bunch of nazi's and white supremists?,,,,,,but no, dont say a thing about trannies and same sex,,,,,,,lmao.
Nobody said conserva s should be banned from spewing their nazi and racist rhetoric. At least, I didn't. Swing and miss per par.
No, you got it all wrong, I don't believe in some fic ious "hate speech". However, I acknowledge people are too in their feelings these days whether they're actually appalled by such speech or they're just virtue signaling.
As well, I have no problem if anyone, left, right, or center, having conversations or whatever about trans or gays, couple, ect... This is something you're claiming I have an issue with when I don't whatsoever.
I have a problem with those who think it's ok to put sexual content in schools with minors in those schools. Simple as that.
You making it out to be some "conserva argument" is asinine. It's the argument of sane beings who don't care to sexualize our youth.
Who is spewing nazi and racist exactly? Bro I could show you plenty of lefties here who use their cute takes on racist and phobic terms but yeah "conserva s", amirite?
But that's exactly the reason these books are being banned... then you would agree the banning is just wrong.
Tim Pool and Milo Yiannopoulos are, just to give two examples.Who is spewing nazi and racist exactly? Bro I could show you plenty of lefties here who use their cute takes on racist and phobic terms but yeah "conserva s", amirite?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
