Reply With Quote
And paying for the millions of Nazi's in Ukraine for their health-care/FULL RIDE.
We're paying billions of dollars to keep Ukraine in the fight. That's why Ukraine is still in it.
Paying for foreign conflicts in what our government specializes in.
And paying for the millions of Nazi's in Ukraine for their health-care/FULL RIDE.
It doesn't, lol.If money spent helping war refugees counts as money spent because Russia invaded Ukraine, then Europe is outspending the United States on Ukraine right now about three to one.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-...reaks-34316163Oil tanker 'literally breaks in half' in horror sinking as helicopter scrambled to save crew
A Russian oil tanker is "rapidly sinking" with 13 crewmen finding themselves overboard, according to reports.
The tanker Volgoneft-212 is understood to have broke in half amid large waves close to the shores of Kerch, off the coast of occupied Crimea. According to Russian outlet Mash, the ship rapidly started to sink.
It added the vessel was transporting 4,000 tonnes of fuel oil. A rescue operation is currently underway in the area.
A tugboat has since arrived at the site of the sinking and rescuers were reportedly attempting to lift crewmen aboard. A helicopter from the Russian Emergencies Ministry flew to help the crew in the Kerch Straight this morning.
...
French training them in surrender techniques
Do you have a real source other than random twitter post for this?
European cucks
Z just quit having elections. tee, hee.
America curtails our's by shooting & attempting to shoot one of the candidates.
Do you have a real source other than random twitter post for this?
https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-...cal-munitions/Ukraine charges Russian general over use of banned chemical weapons
Ukrainian prosecutors charged Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, the head of the Russian Armed Forces' radiation, chemical, and biological defense troops, in absentia with the use of banned chemical weapons in Ukraine, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said on Dec. 16.
According to the SBU's investigation, chemical weapons have been used in more than 4,800 cases since the beginning of the full-scale invasion.
Since 2022, over 2,000 Ukrainian service members have been hospitalized with chemical poisoning, and three have died, Ukrainian Colonel Artem Vlasiuk said earlier this week.
"Russian forces mostly use ammunition with toxic substances by dropping them from FPV (first-person-view) drones on Ukrainian positions. When chemical grenades are detonated, their poisonous compounds affect human mucous membranes, especially the eyes and respiratory tract," the SBU’s statement said.
When detonated, the irritating gases force Ukrainian soldiers finding cover in the trenches to leave and expose themselves to Russian gunfire, the statement noted.
Ukraine handed over soil samples that prove the use of banned materials to independent laboratories of the International Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons for examination and were confirmed to breach international humanitarian law.
...
https://kyivindependent.com/russian-...media-reports/Russian general charged with chemical weapons crimes reported dead in Moscow explosion
Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, the head of the Russian Armed Forces' radiation, chemical, and biological defense troops, was reportedly killed in an explosion at a residence in Moscow on the morning of Dec. 17, according to Russian media.
Ukraine's Security Service (SBU) on Dec. 16 sentenced Kirillov in absentia for the use of banned chemical weapons in Ukraine.
Kirillov and another Russian servicemember, reported to be his personal assistant, were killed in an explosion near the entrance to a residential building in Moscow in the early hours of Dec. 17, according to the Russian Telegram news channel Astra.
Russia's Investigative Committee has opened a criminal case on the incident. The committee reported that the explosion was caused by a device planted on a scooter near the entrance to the building.
...
https://www.csis.org/analysis/base-d...an-involvementBase Development in Mali Indicates Continued Russian Involvement
...
The strategic significance of the battle remains unclear: nothing suggests that Russia intends to reduce its involvement in Mali. But Malians’ hopes that the 2020 coup and ensuing shift towards Russia as Bamako’s main military partner would improve the security situation in the country have been undermined by the attacks in northern Mali and Bamako. But the July ambush was not the last highly lethal attack against Russian forces in Mali, suggesting that it may have been an outlier in size but was not an isolated incident. If Russian casualties continue to mount amid a worsening security situation, popular narratives about Wagner’s military prowess could erode, making Russia’s military presence in the country more tenuous. Confidence in Russian support may also decrease following the collapse of the Moscow-backed Assad government in Syria, pushing Mali’s leaders to at least consider alternative security partners. For now, though, it appears that Russia is in Bamako to stay.
...
Another ukronazi bites the dust
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukrai...ussian-victoryThe Price of Russian Victory
Why Letting Putin Win Would Cost America More Than Supporting Ukraine
Elaine McCusker
Many Americans are concerned about the cost of aid to Ukraine. It took the U.S. Congress seven months to approve the last funding measure to provide aid. A November Pew poll indicates that most Americans support helping Ukraine, yet roughly a quarter believe that Washington has been providing too much assistance. Elected officials, including the Vice President-elect JD Vance, continue making misleading comments about being “half a trillion dollars in the hole for the Ukraine conflict.” The billionaire Elon Musk, who is helping the incoming Trump administration sort out plans to cut federal spending, posted on social media last February that it was “insane” for the United States to continue its investment in Ukraine.
Such worries are understandable. The United States is faced with numerous challenges. Illegal immigration, financing the national debt, compe ion with China, war in the Middle East, and a generally unpredictable global security environment all compete for attention and resources. It is not surprising that it is difficult for Washington to sort out its priorities.
But Americans worried only about the cost of helping Ukraine are thinking about the issue in the wrong way. They should be worried about the cost of not helping Ukraine. Right now, by providing aid to Kyiv, the United States is preventing Russia from directly menacing eastern and central Europe, which would doubtless consume even more U.S. resources. Washington may, in fact, be deterring a direct war between NATO and Moscow, one in which U.S. forces would have to fight.
...
What would be cheaper than all of that is for Ukraine to negotiate and end the war on realistic terms.
Give Russia whatever it wants and let it get more in a few years after it rearms.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
