It's just impossible to talk basketball with you.
But I'm going to reply one last time, after that I'll just call out your re ed takes and not bother with arguments because there aren't any.
Castle got benched on 15th of December against Minnesota.
Was benched for 10 games and Spurs went 4-6 in that period.
Wins were against Blazers, Nets, Hawks (OT) and Clippers (B2B when they were completely checked out).
The best win in that stretch was against Denver when Jeremy was out and Castle started.
Our defensive rating in that period is heavily inflated by Nets and Clippers scoring just 86 and 87 points, respectively.
Nets that sat everyone and Clippers on already mentioned B2B.
Blazers scored 94, Timberwolves 106, in other 7 games Spurs gave up at least 110 points (not including OT points).
Castle averaged 18mpg in those 10 games off the bench.
Ideal by your standards and yet everyone with a functioning roster still dropped 110 points on these Spurs.
Then he got the starting role back when we started a stretch agianst playoff teams and it's all his fault defense is garbage? Even though he did well on his matchup every single game considering he's the one who guards opposition's best perimeter player?
But you're one of those ing re s who's rather going to keep digging himself deeper than admit you were wrong.
Out of all the gimmicky re s on this forum full of lunatics you're the worst one and you never provide any arguments other than anecdotal evidence with no numbers to back it up.
Why do I even bother with idiots like yourself.
Castle is the only player other than Wemby who's showing some signs that he could be a long term piece, but you'd play him 15 minutes a game.
Since you like to act like a smartass, who would get more minutes? Castle plays 25mpg as of now, please elaborate on who between Tre, Wesley and Branham should get those extra 10 minutes?
Why do I even bother with some of you re s, ffs.