Reply With Quote
what do you foresee?
Just think it all just getting started
what do you foresee?
What do I want or think will happen?
Two different things
Fore see
Little retribution since it is always disappointing
You can discuss both, if you're comfortable with sharing your opinion on an anonymous board.
Many posters choose not to.
I am good
Hoping for the best
Expecting not
it's ok if you don't want to talk about it
Looks like all we have to do is watch you everything up as usual. It's going as expected.
We took the House, the Senate and the Presidency.
You? You got the sour grapes.
criminalizing the other sides votes
they're making it illegal for elected officials to disagree with their priorities
Tennessee Republicans finalized an immigration bill Thursday establishing a new enforcement office exempt from public records law and criminalizing local officials who support sanctuary policies for immigrants.
The GOP supermajority in the General Assembly this week gave swift passage to the immigration enforcement law despite warnings from staff attorneys that the bill is "cons utionally suspect" in its unprecedented effort to curtail elected officials' voting decisions.https://www.tennessean.com/story/new...n/78021305007/"It is illegal under state law to set up sanctuary cities. That statute, as defined now, does not have any teeth in it," said House Majority Leader William Lamberth, R-Portland. "We are not going to allow cities and counties set up a sanctuary city. If they vote to do so, absolutely it will be a felony and they will be removed from office."
The criminalization clause is an unprecedented step by the Republican legislative supermajority to control the specific votes of local officials. There are protections in both the U.S. Cons ution and state Cons ution that shield official actions such as votes or speech made during legislative debate.
so much for speech and debate
A single Republican, Sen. Todd Gardenhire, R-Chattanooga, joined Democrats in voting against the measure, calling it a "dangerous precedent" to charge local officials for casting a vote.
"y'all's policies are illegal. m'kay?"
"My hope is that nobody is prosecuted under this," Lamberth said. "Just don't vote for these policies. Don't push them. Don't implement them."
looks like the plan is to throw the political opposition in jail, for politically opposing
does federal law even apply to the president's allies any more?
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/ne...man-andy-ogles
you morons caused a measles comeback in Texas.
I can only hope
Why do you hope that?
thanks for confirming my hunch about that
seems commonsensical
American citizens should not have to enter into a contract with a private company (that’s an X account signup!) to receive government communications
OR ARE THEY?
https://x.com/Acyn/status/1889409512073003214
speech and debate used as a shield against defamation
https://apnews.com/article/nancy-mac...30fa6c701f18de
surprise surprise, Rep Mace's "victim hotline" was just an answering machine that nobody answers
that sucked attention away from ready local resources
https://www.motherjones.com/politics...advocates-say/But one aspect of the explosive speech has gone unexamined: A so-called hotline that Mace said she set up to encourage victims to come forward—which nobody actually answers
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
