No, that's not what you did. You made assertions about WHY they traded him that are detached from reality and rely on you assuming a whole of a lot in order to make it a plausible narrative so that you could be critical of people who want the Spurs to make a more active approach to building a team around Wemby. You implied that this was an inevitable outcome that you saw coming a year ago which is just bull man.
I definitely agree there is a chance this is a good move but the likelihood of that outcome is so much smaller than the likelyhood that this is a bad move. Having a non zero chance a move works out doesn't make that move good in any shape or way so why is that a relevant point here? How many times has trading a top 3 25 year old player been the best move for a team to take? Never and definitely not for such a ty return.
A top 3 player who is 25 in the NBA may have work ethic issues and may not be perfect, but that hast not stopped him from being a TOP 3 player in the NBA! Calling it an obvious tumor is ridiculous! There's nothin obvious about this which is why the sentiment is that this is this is the most shocking trade in NBA history. Dude, I know how you are but claiming this was obvious in any way is absolutely ridiculous even for you.Nah, I think you guys are having a tumor waved under your nose and are pretending you can't smell it.
But yes, I did firmly have this stance last year as well. Yes, all les are legitimate, and if Dallas would've won, they would've had every right to hang that banner. But running the table against a young team like OKC and a ty team like Minnesota (and an perpetually injured team like LAC) isn't exactly something that requires a legit contender. It's like how Rockets fans pat themselves on the back for almost winning a third game against the Warriors in 2019 while ignoring the West was basically decimated that year.

Reply With Quote
