Reply With Quote
As long as this is his last term, I don't think the Dems are terrified of anything, tbh... like I said, he is his worst enemy.
Proceeding...
Def stolen Marxist nono."Stolen" followed by some babbling about ideology...
The irony in this post
As long as this is his last term, I don't think the Dems are terrified of anything, tbh... like I said, he is his worst enemy.
Proceeding...
Idc what marxists say tbh.
Nah. I'm not going to end your question because you just keep asking dumb questions either way. Like any non troll could even imagine asking what was so bad about the last 4 years. You can't think of even one example?
...that's why your new Democrat leader declared war on Trump 48 hours ago. And the Black Senator (name escapes me) declared war on Trump as well a couple days earlier.
Nothing has changed since November of '16. He will not stop. You cannot stop him. Your side made this personal and Trump recognized the scent of blood and followed you in like a rabid dog. You got close to him in PA., but God was right there and made sure that old man was not set free ((("free at last, free at last"))) just yet.
I'm simply pointing out you can't lead with a fairly disproven conspiracy at this point and then point your finger at somebody else and accuse them of being indoctrinated. We call that irony, not marxism, tbh...
He won a close contest in 2016, he got his ass handed to him in 2020, and he won handedly again in 2024. See? it's not complicated, and you're not going to lose your cult membership card for admitting as much.
We all know this because he filed not one, but a dozen+ lawsuits and lost every one specifically due to lack of evidence. His own DOJ looked and said there was no fraud. This is no longer an arguable point. The problem is that you think that stating what happened is a personal affront to him, when it's not, simple as that.
I think exploring why both parties lost their re-election chances the last two elections gives a better idea of what's going on. In bency used to be a slight advantage, but has turned into apparently a burden now.
You declared war on 44th back in 2008, and here we are. Don't hate the players, hate the game. Like I said, as long as we have a democracy, I don't think the Dems are terrified of anything...
You can't say one bad thing about your experience the past four years.
...not after Trump won this time. Otherwise last time would be over now, and I wouldn't have a pot to piss in,,,nary window to throw it out of.You can't say one bad thing about your experience the past four years.
It's funny this "conspiracy" is only "fairly disproven" but not definitely disproven, why is that? Who told you it was a stolen election exactly? I'll wait....
Damn I should've read your whole post initially because you're wrong as ! Dozens of lawsuits were thrown out, especially as the SC level, and not because they had no merit. He most definitely didn't "loser every one specifically due to lack of evidence".
Who's the cult member now Mr. Marx?
Nono is smart
But plays stupid on purpose
We're tearing it all down Nono
If democracy dies, it dies
Why are you OK with its dying?
Does the same at the ballot box unfortunately.
Because there are re s that will not be convinced no matter how many facts you throw at their face. It's certainly definitely disproven where it matters the most: the courts.It's funny this "conspiracy" is only "fairly disproven" but not definitely disproven, why is that? Who told you it was a stolen election exactly? I'll wait....
The only thing done so far is making sure "the left" makes it back to power, tbh...
Again, you continue on with your disinfo.
Post "the dozen of lawsuits" that were thrown out with any merit, including the one that reached the SCOTUS. I'll wait.
A lawsuit is not thrown out if it has any merit, period. This is how our system of justice works. If the lawsuits were meritless, then they certainly lacked any evidence.
lmao
lol disinfo... one cult conspiracy after another. The courts cases and their resolution are publicly available information, BTW. You just don't want to look, it wasn't pretty for the loser.Again, you continue on with your disinfo.
I'm not wasting time looking up numerous articles on the issue. If that's your thing, go for it but it doesn't seem like it from what you're regurgitating thus far.
You could easily listen to Roberts own voice saying just as much at the SC level.
whatever it takes
I troll here and there, tbh... that said, the whole "you don't like Trump = you're the enemy = marxist, cultist, AnTiFa" is pretty dumb, tbh
Of course you won't. You don't need to read any article, just the actual public lawsuit decisions
Roberts and this SC had a chance to "make the record straight" on the case they handled and passed. Again, if it had any merit, they simply would've acted on it.You could easily listen to Roberts on voice saying just as much at the SC level.
Again, in his own words he was afraid of what could come of such a decision. You're flat out wrong but it's all good Nono.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
