You didn't answer my question.
Question pending.
Sure, the pretense is cutting spending.
Please don't dodge the question again.
Nothing is being dodged you just don't have a good rebuttal because you can't twist my answers.
In your hypothetical did Soros assemble a team for some other purpose than Elon assembled his "DOGE" team?
You didn't answer my question.
Question pending.
Sure, the pretense is cutting spending.
Please don't dodge the question again.
Your question was answered the first time.
You look really dumb trying to keep up this dodge thing today.![]()
Dodge #5.
That wasn't the question I asked.
You answered your question.![]()
No, I answered your question. In your hypothetical, if the Soros team was created for the same reason as Musk's "DOGE" team I said I would approve. I wouldn't give a if they had access to my information.
You look really dumb trying to keep up this dodge thing today.![]()
Or Soros' perceived political enemies and business compe ors?
You really have a lot of trust in hypothetical completely connected unelected bureaucrat George Soros.
Thank you for your honest expression of trust in George Soros.![]()
The stupidest part of your hypothetical was suspending belief and pretending Soros would assemble a team to audit the same en y that funds all of his NGO's![]()
According to you, that doesn't matter.
You trust him.
That was your answer.
Why is USAID giving money to the
NY Times?
Really?
The stupidest part of your hypothetical was suspending belief and pretending Soros would assemble a team to audit the same en y that funds all of his NGO's![]()
Government propaganda arms...all of them.
According to you, that doesn't matter.
You would give him full discretion regarding who gets paid and who does not.
He could audit the payments to those NGOs and say everything's cool.
You trust him.
That was your answer.
Your hypothetical was so stupid that you're now forced to try and prop up a strawman to keep it afloat![]()
It's not my fault you can't think things through.
If you want to flip-flop and change your answer to say you wouldn't trust Soros, you are free to do so.
As it stands, you are on record as saying you would trust George Soros in the same position Elon Musk is now in RE: the federal government.![]()
Nice
Like a bowling pin
Looks like they skyrocketed under Trump too tbh.
Was he too busy budgeting hundreds of millions in USAID for Ivanka's programs to notice?
You're hypothetical question wasn't thought through very well as evidenced by your need to add a strawman to try and keep your gotcha alive. Disingenuous and pathetic. I don't know why I ever think you'll change![]()
I'm done with you.
Wait, what does Sinclair have to do with this?
There was no strawman.
You just didn't think things through.
It's not uncommon with you. You do these things quite often.
For the record, my answer would be no -- I wouldn't trust Soros in this role anymore than I trust Elon.
That is the correct answer you should have just said in the first place. The opportunities for these people to act in their own self-interests are too great.
But you're done with thinking. That much is clear. You're an NPC cheerbot for Trump and anything associated with him.
I'm dne with y
u.
![]()
Strawman #1
Strawman #2
You're pathetic dude. No point in conversing with someone as disingenuous as you are.
Not strawmen. You're fine with all the power Elon has been given and you said you would be fine if Soros had been given the same power.
If you want to flip-flop, go ahead and flip-flop. It's not a crime and there's no shame in admitting you just didn't think things through.
You're OK with Elon's being given all this power because you trust him.
You wouldn't be OK if Soros were given the same power because you don't trust him.
Accurate?
Make yourself clear.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)