Reply With Quote
the part that's really bonkers, is that Douglass gets rubbed off the schedule because he receives attention "in part" due to his immutable characteristics
top down, whole of government censorship of naughty words isn't nothing
it brazenly tramples free speech, but that's just a warmup
the real meal deal is firing women, blacks, any identifiable minority
or at least insulting them to their face
"you were only hired because of your immutable characteristics, how could it have been otherwise?"
like, this is just ing insane. the government is pretending that it passed the Inverse Civil Rights Act overnight and everyone is acting like it's a real law.
the part that's really bonkers, is that Douglass gets rubbed off the schedule because he receives attention "in part" due to his immutable characteristics
as if it were somehow dishonorable or disreputable to have been a famous negro orator and writer in the mid 19th century in the USA, or to be remembered for it now.
in his own time Frederick Douglass's brethren were thralls and slaves
If only people will read my posts that they won't read
are you allergic to saying what you mean?
guess so
Darrin struggles to use words
Trumpy gender ideology gets hit with a TRO
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...onald-j-trump/
He'll have to appeal. In the meantime swing the turret and open fire.
true
Trump has no valid authority to defund the whole of primary and college education because it doesn't conform with his resegregation plans for the USA
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/...funds-over-dei“This threat to rip away the federal funding our public K-12 schools and colleges receive flies in the face of the law,” Senator Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington, wrote in a statement Saturday. “While it’s anyone’s guess what falls under the Trump administration’s definition of ‘DEI,’ there is simply no authority or basis for Trump to impose such a mandate.”
the tone of grandiosity and total presumption of the argument -- no more woke! --belies its total incoherence
it pretends to outlaw racism, but what it really outlaws is talking about racism
and how did it outlaw talking about racism and certain immutable characteristics of US history?
with an ideological decree by the agency head
the authority relied on is totally spurious and it goes without saying that no one should comply
...and a by now very credible threat to withhold funding if ideological compliance is less than total
Stings, don't it? Now you know.
Wine still dying on this defeated hill
He ain't usually this dour though even at these defeated moments.
Long live Thread
They still haven't learned they lost the WH because of DEI. Why was Kamala their candidate?
Exactly
And then when old Joe stroked out during the debate, they were stuck with her.
You didn't need to confirm you voted for Trump cuz DEI.
Have you boycotted Costco, Darrin?
Was never a Costco member. Why was Kamala Joe's VP?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
sure