So, now we have a US president directly policing universities for offensive speech
Is that about the size of it?
So, now we have a US president directly policing universities for offensive speech
Is that about the size of it?
and promising to denaturalize Americans for speech
Not even a public university at that
Is Khalil a member of CUAD
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antis...article-845664
These are specified in INA § 212(a)(3)(B) and commonly referred to as Terrorism Related Inadmissibility Grounds (TRIG)
-Who are a representative of a terrorist organization or a member of a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity
-Who endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization
Ok
So CUAD has very radical beliefs.
I notice there isn't anything in the article that describes participation in violence or terrorism by CUAD.
Are beliefs and speech really enough to deport people?
Yeah, y'all also dug up a McCarthy era law that has been used sporadically ever since.
In the 1950s it was used to keep out European Jews
"CNN
—
A federal judge in New York has blocked any efforts by President Donald Trump’s administration to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist at Columbia University who was arrested Saturday night, until a conference Wednesday, according to court do ents..."
https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/10/us/ma...hnk/index.html
The stretching is incredible.
there are already criminal laws against terrorism, the sort of "terrorism" you see enforced in this case is the kind of highly contrived guilt by association/speech crime typical of the GWOT 20 years ago, the Puerto Rican nationalist scare of the 1970s and 80s, and the McCarthy era.
the argument is mostly stipulated facts by the controlling authority, as above by TSA
connecc da dots
It didn't when Ole Joe branded Tulsi a terrorist
Nah, she was branded a foreign asset.
She still is.
Wait, Joe had Tulsi arrested on terrorist charges?
Is Khalil a member of a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity? yes or no.
He should have just said he's a proud boy now.
The same members of Congress who refused to stand as Trump honored a child beating cancer and families who lost loved ones to murderous illegal immigrants are now defending an Arab immigrant who is a leader of a group that sympathizes with terror organizations Hamas and Hezbollah and calls for the “end of Western civilization.” Defending him is a strange hill to die on, but the Dems have become a very strange party.
Please don't change...it'll make the midterms so much more satisfying.
Meanwhile, back in a sane America, Inflation has been cut by more than 1/2 in the first month of the Trump presidency while eggs are down $2.00/dozen -- on average.
And, the administration seems to getting the upper hand on an activist judiciary that seems to want to run the administrative branch.
Promises made, promises kept.
Very fine people…on both sides!
look who got his talking points today.
Yep, that point of time remains Trump's finest hour. I/We were at a juncture where the old man had to decide where he stood. He slept on it over night came out the next day and I wasn't sure what he would do...bend over like all those before him, OR act like somebody. He acted like somebody. CNN has never been the same.
I told him then on the Twitter than he'd never look and not find me there. He followed me then. The President of the United States followed me.
Let us proceed...
And the weak males cry again! Lmfao
in' 'eh!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)