Even worse, I've seen some of them basically berating fans for thinking that they should have reported anything earlier - saying that Pop and the Spurs deserve whatever level of privacy they want (which is true, but there are caveats).
The Spurs do not view fans as cons uents. One reporter was flat out ridiculing a fan who questioned why the Spurs and local media haven't said anything several days after the fact with "you don't deserve , you fans have such an en led at ude".
To the Spurs, the fans are just their piggy bank. They expect the fans to fork over their money on demand and not make their lives difficult. The Spurs don't believe the fans deserve anything more than the right to sit in seats and cheer. Don't expect any information. Don't expect wins. Don't boo Kawhi.
Pop is a public figure. A public figure's health is of note to an organization's cons uency. For politicians, that is the public. For companies, it's the company's shareholders, customers and vendors/suppliers. For a sport team - who are their cons uents? Shareholders, players, the staff, the league, AND THEIR FANS (the people who keep them in business).
Nico Harrison's tone def comments the other day are along this line of thinking. He told reporters that his duty is to the Mavericks, not to their fans. This completely ignores the fact that the Mavericks cannot exist without their fans. The Spurs seem to share Nico's twisted vision of what their cons uency is.