Reply With Quote
Time to Pelican Brief Crusty Roberts and Amnesty Amy. ASAP. Obstructionist resistlib neocon globalists.
It's sad our two best justices are boomers (and not boomercons).
...HE did help us. In that Pennsylvania berry patch last Summer.
Time to Pelican Brief Crusty Roberts and Amnesty Amy. ASAP. Obstructionist resistlib neocon globalists.
It's sad our two best justices are boomers (and not boomercons).
Well, Trump had the prime chance of sticking Judge Pirro in there and instead went for Amy. us. Roberts had been waiting patiently for a cohort and got it with her.
And she's gonna get worse moving to the Left upwards of 80% of the time if not completely Left within the next 2 years. And Roberts will follow religiously her movement.
We're ed.
He had to be better than this and failed.
ADDENDUM: And CNN knew it in that circa. I remember they were happy and said she was gonna be problem for the Right. I said at the time:::"Bull , you're just sour grapes." But, yet felt a bit sick at the stomach.
But, they knew.
My heart bleeds for you that even by stealing seats ya’ll could only get a 4 to 5 court on the most nefarious or uncons utional of the agenda.
She's very culturally woke, adopted black kids etc.
Apart from being pro-life she's a mainstream Catholic Democrat tbh.
Jeanine Pirro is great but she's too old and has had too many health issues. Got to pick someone younger. Someone who probably wouldn't have gotten confirmed at the time, like a Matt Gaetz or Pam Bondi.
We're gonna suffer greatly for that pick.
Enough to wreck a mood, by God.
And like I said: once she crosses over a few times she'll cross for good and then it's gonna be tragic. I thought we had learned our lesson of picking wrong.
THEY never make a mistake. Ever. It's their religion.
God, how y'all hate a woman who thinks for herself instead of doing as she's told
You ain't had 1 Justice turn. Not 1.
well, two of em crossed over the other day to defeat Trumplandia
but they held it so long they mooted the TRO, SCOTUS temporizing for Trump has been a theme for years
"inside baseball"
according to the dog realism of Newsweek
they're not talking about nothing though
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opini...ve/ar-AA1BN9j0Conservatives are keen to see a revival of the nondelegation doctrine, which prohibits Congress from handing over its core legislative powers to federal agencies or other nonelected officials.
On March 27, Coney Barrett, a Trump nominee, expressed major concerns about reviving the doctrine, which hasn't been used since the 1930s and could severely weaken the power of government agencies.
That Coney broad was a one trick pony (abortion) and the old man figured that was enough to put her in there.
I'd rather have abortion and a batting average of 1.000 every day since.
the supreme court essentially nullified or read the reconstruction amendments entirely backwards for almost a century. the current supreme court believes they mandate rather than forbid racial discrimination
sort of with keeping with the current SCOTUS's take on the 14th Amendment as color-blind
so far up its own ass
it cannot see the original history nor what followed it
Last edited by Winehole23; 4 Weeks Ago at 07:07 PM. Reason: not...nor
Leonard Leo spent $1 billion plus for the current SCOTUS (R) majority
The last day on which a majority of the Supreme Court’s justices had been appointed by Democratic presidents was May 14, 1969.
The persistent problem till Trump made President was Republican Presidents getting in there and appointing Left leaning Justices one after another. Even that barrel a Bush2 tried to appoint that one woman (name escapes me) who was extremely Left and they told him "No, you goofy bas , you. No!"Leonard Leo spent $1 billion plus for the current SCOTUS (R) majority
Trumplandia is apparently on the warpath against trans, I wonder who's the next victim of national salvation
https://www.lawdork.com/p/scotus-fre...-schools-lgbtq“I guess your colloquy with Justice Barrett makes me wonder whether this case is really the right vehicle to evaluate any of these issues,“ Jackson asked Eric Baxter, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty lawyer representing the parents. “[W]e don't even know how these books are actually being used in the classroom.“
Jackson also raised a discussion about whether it can burden a parent’s free exercise right where parents have the ability to choose sending their students to a private school or to home school them, in addition to sending them to the public schools.
ACB: Are your clients objecting to exposure or to indoctrination?
Becket: Exposure
ACB: well, let's pretend you didn't say that
Trumplandia is already in a post-cons utional headspace, it would seem
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
