Reply With Quote
Get rid of VRA Section 2, overturn Citizens United v FEC, maybe overturn Obergefell and return it to the states
the real news is that four justices basically voted for Führerprinzip
Get rid of VRA Section 2, overturn Citizens United v FEC, maybe overturn Obergefell and return it to the states
I did but I got itchy scotus
there is approximately zero chance a very Republican Supreme Court will turn off the dark money spigot that propelled them to where they are now.Get rid of VRA Section 2, overturn Citizens United v FEC, maybe overturn Obergefell and return it to the states
Definitely propels Democrats a lot too especially from 2018 to 2022 and even down ballot in 2024 since they learned to play the game that they sucked at downballot from 2010 to 2016
in the putative interest of protecting US users from so-far hypothetical foreign harms, in an unsigned, unanimous opinion SCOTUS has allowed Congress to trample free expression and restrict information to Americans
sounds like neo-Cold War bull to me
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-c...5190f893e52777The U.S. has said it’s concerned about TikTok collecting vast swaths of user data, including sensitive information on viewing habits, that could fall into the hands of the Chinese government through coercion. Officials have also warned the algorithm that fuels what users see on the app is vulnerable to manipulation by Chinese authorities, who can use it to shape content on the platform in a way that’s difficult to detect
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...4-656_ca7d.pdf
optics
what's the point of even pretending when it's game over?
Sotomayer looking rough. Diabeetus is a killer.
^^^ carrion feeder
Trump wants US free speech to be more like the UK: curtailed by the state and the threat of libel
(Wynn is a sex pest and a billionaire donor to Trump)
they may rule in Trump's favor later
for now, Hampton Dellinger keeps his job
https://www.newsbreak.com/share/3824...-fired-for-nowThe U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an emergency appeal to fire the leader of an independent watchdog agency in the issue first to reach the Supreme Court challenging President Donald Trump 's executive orders.
"I am glad to be able to continue my work as an independent government watchdog and whistleblower advocate," Dellinger said in a statement after the ruling. "I am grateful to the judges and justices who have concluded that I should be allowed to remain on the job while the courts decide whether my office can retain a measure of independence from direct partisan and political control."
And frankly because the old man didn't read the rules on what it takes to fire the . So, we got spanked.
This should not have happened. GD it!!!
Meh, the SC just said wait until Wednesday to see what the district court says
Not an L yet
If you were looking for a unified theory explaining the last 20 years of Supreme Court politics, you could do a lot worse than “Citizens United was a direct reaction to Obama winning, and Shelby County was a direct reaction to Obama winning again”
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...SCOTUS holds that the EPA *cannot* order cities to maintain acceptable water quality standards by limiting the discharge—usually sewage—that they dump into nearby bodies of water (like oceans and bays). The four women justices, dissenting, say that's ridiculous.
SCOTUS upholds ~$2B ruling against the State Department for denying payment for work already done
https://s3.do entcloud.org/do en...31-order-2.pdf
Alito apparently doesn't think that Congress exists or has any authority
Nor judges, for that matter
It's the Barrett girl. Where she votes Roberts follows.
SOB.
And you could tell last night at the last when Trump was goin' down that SC line she loathes him. I've seen that look from my MIL.
Judiciary not part of the government and/or the law anymore unless they're approving everything the executive branch does. God help us.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
