Reply With Quote
snacks has his fetishes tbh
Musk being "cheated out of a son" is a minor subtext here
seems major for El0n though
snacks has his fetishes tbh
Yeah because trash like that has drove out every one ever and made it an echo chamber.
it's an open forum
anyone at all is welcome to improve the quality of posting, including you
I don't know where sicky is coming from these days. He does seem like a coiled spring.
JUST LOOK AT THE SAVINGS
the self-dealing has started, El0n has salted his cronies all over the government
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...ft-1235325667/After Rolling Stone reported that FAA staffers were told to hunt for money for a Starlink deal, the source says, “They switched tactics — limited the pool of people who know about it and made them sign NDAs.” The source adds that “DOGE staffers who are now FAA employees are calling the shots.”
"rollingstone"
tee, hee.
not an administrator, not a member according to court declarations
The old man is runnin' this, WinesterPERIODnot an administrator, not a member according to court declarations
Just like Trump Derangement Syndrome is real, Elon Derangement Syndrome is real too.
Shut up stupid.
Hi, fart-face, long time---no see.
fairly obvious, tbh
Horse . Ya's got caught with your hand in the cookie jar.fairly obvious, tbh
Yup Musk is robbing us blind
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/05/...ex-tesla-llms/An employee at Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company xAI leaked a private key on GitHub that for the past two months could have allowed anyone to query private xAI large language models (LLMs) which appear to have been custom made for working with internal data from Musk’s companies, including SpaceX, Tesla and Twitter/X, KrebsOnSecurity has learned.
kill the messenger
https://www.propublica.org/article/t...ty-energy-data
big news this week is the attempted DOGE takeover of the Copyright office and the Library of Congress
and moar illegal self-dealing, of course
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/t...ny-amtrak.html
Last edited by Winehole23; 05-13-2025 at 07:11 AM.
Congress stands up to DOGE a little bit because it's their privacy on the line now
https://apnews.com/article/trump-lib...196e505e4faa51The implications of Trump’s installing a close ally as librarian of Congress could be far-reaching.
For instance, the librarian could see requests made by lawmakers to the Congressional Research Service, which are usually seen only by the requesting office and the CRS itself, according to a congressional aide who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The nonpartisan agency is largely known as the think tank of Capitol Hill and provides analyses meant to help lawmakers in the legislative process. But Democrats are already concerned about what kind of information Trump-appointed officials could access in a process that is typically confidential between CRS and lawmakers.
Senior House Democrats on Monday also raised the prospect that data held by the Library of Congress, which holds a vast archive of books and historical do ents, could have been improperly transferred to the executive branch, including officials at Trump adviser Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency.
Unauthorized information sharing “could compromise legislative branch independence and the ability of Members of Congress to carry out their cons utional duties,” according to the letter, which was signed by lawmakers including New York Rep. Joe Morelle and Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, the top Democrats on the House Administration and Appropriations committees, respectively. They are asking for an inspector general investigation.
Since returning to office in January, Trump has purged officials he regards as opposed to him and to his Republican agenda. Hayden, nominated by President Barack Obama in 2015 and confirmed on a 74-18 Senate vote the following year, named Perlmutter as head of the Copyright Office in 2020.
Shortly before her firing, Perlmutter’s office released a highly anticipated report that questioned the legality of the tech industry’s use of copyrighted works to “train” their artificial intelligence systems and compete with the human-made works they were trained on.
Tech companies have argued their AI training practices are protected by the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for limited uses of copyrighted materials such as for teaching, research or transforming the copyrighted work into something different. Perlmutter’s report questioned those assumptions, arguing that “making commercial use of vast troves of copyrighted works to produce expressive content that competes with them in existing markets, especially where this is accomplished through illegal access, goes beyond established fair use boundaries.”
The report — despite being marked as “pre-publication” — quickly made waves in legal circles after it was posted online late last week, winning praise from creators who have challenged the tech industry in court, and criticism from a tech industry trade group.
It was the third and final part of a yearslong study that Perlmutter began in 2023, with the intent to advise Congress and others on whether reforms are needed. The report didn’t call for government intervention, and its nuanced findings hold no official weight in the numerous copyright infringement lawsuits now pending against tech companies.
But attention around the report grew after Perlmutter’s firing Saturday, including from Trump’s supporters.
Mike Davis, a lawyer who regularly defends Trump, posted an alarm emoji on social media and warned: “Now tech bros are going to attempt to steal creators’ copyrights for AI profits. This is 100% unacceptable.”
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
