Reply With Quote
people did the same thing during the Iraq war, suggesting that being against the war or sticking up for due process was "objectively pro-terrorist"
not sure how you got there, especially with my last postWinehole a big fanboy of foreign gang bangers.. No surprise
i guess you didn't read it
people did the same thing during the Iraq war, suggesting that being against the war or sticking up for due process was "objectively pro-terrorist"
same simple-mindedness
90% of Bush's detainees at Gitmo had no intelligence value and were released without any charges at all
goat herds and victims of local score-settling turned in for bounties tbh
the notion that 10-20 million people in the US today deserve the same treatment is mind-boggling
Hi derp. You get tired of talking to yourself on your own board?
trying to rope in the DOD
this is ominous, Trump's mass deportation policy has already assumed police state qualities
https://www.kqed.org/news/12037889/t...e-records-showThe Trump administration is looking to build an immigration detention facility at Travis Air Force Base in Fairfield, California, and pushing to speed up a review process, according to internal government communications obtained by KQED.
The proposed installation is part of an aggressive effort to expand immigration detention nationally, and specifically to use property owned by the U.S. Department of Defense in service of President Trump’s stated goal of deporting 1 million people in his first year in office.
In the early April emails, federal officials discussed efforts to evaluate several military installations, including Travis Air Force Base, for Homeland Security’s immigration detention and removal operations — and tee them up for approval by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
The emails show significant coordination among Department of Defense and Homeland Security officials to expedite the plans. The emails do not describe the scope or design of the proposed detention compound at Travis Air Force Base, nor how many people it would be expected to hold.
You try way too hard. All bark, no bite. Cool shtick bro!
Damn right! Biden wasn't ever president though, autopen was! Biden is a ing re though.
Big time #'s.
Can't wait till we hit the Sanctuary Cities.
Could get into the street if we hit hard enough.
So, hit 'em real in' hard!
Small numbers. Hopefully, gets to Obama numbers.
Set a new record for deporting US citizen children with cancer, so be happy.
https://kfor.com/news/local/were-cit...rent-suspects/‘We’re citizens!’: Oklahoma City family traumatized after ICE raids home, but they weren’t suspects
...
The woman, who News 4 will refer to as “Marisa”, and her three daughters came to Oklahoma looking for a slower, more affordable pace of life.
They rented a house in a seemingly safe northwest Oklahoma City neighborhood.
Her husband stayed back in Maryland a couple of extra weeks, planning to join them this weekend.
“I was like, ‘okay, Oklahoma’s my home now,’” Marisa said.
But any comfort they had disappeared Thursday morning when about 20 men, armed with guns, busted through the door.
...
I'm already ecstatic.
ICE wrecked the lives of these Americans who didn't do anything wromg
They won''t be the last
https://kfor.com/news/local/were-cit...rent-suspects/
The ST king of disinformation strikes againhard to see any crime tbh
Hard to see a crime when all you do is rely on and swallow whole screenshots from Bluesky and don't take the time to read the actual criminal complaint against Judge Dugan. Caught with your pants down again...will you ever learn?
Bolded is from her OWN courtroom deputy. She's ed.
D. Judge DUGAN escorts Flores-Ruiz through a “jury door” to avoid his arrest.
29. Multiple witnesses have described their observations after Judge DUGAN returned
to her courtroom after directing members of the arrest team to the Chief Judge’s office. For
example, the courtroom deputy recalled that upon the courtroom deputy’s return to the courtroom,
defense counsel for Flores-Ruiz was talking to the clerk, and Flores-Ruiz was seated in the jury
box, rather than in the gallery. The courtroom deputy believed that counsel and the clerk were
having an off-the-record conversation to pick the next court date. Defense counsel and Flores-Ruiz
then walked toward each other and toward the public courtroom exit. The courtroom deputy then
saw Judge DUGAN get up and heard Judge DUGAN say something like “Wait, come with me.”
10
Despite having been advised of the administrative warrant for the arrest of Flores-Ruiz, Judge
DUGAN then escorted Flores-Ruiz and his counsel out of the courtroom through the “jury door,”
which leads to a nonpublic area of the courthouse. These events were also unusual for two reasons.
First, the courtroom deputy had previously heard Judge DUGAN direct people not to sit in the jury
box because it was exclusively for the jury’s use. Second, according to the courtroom deputy, only
deputies, juries, court staff, and in-custody defendants being escorted by deputies used the back
jury door. Defense attorneys and defendants who were not in custody never used the jury door.
30. Attorney B similarly explained that after returning to the courtroom, Judge
DUGAN forcefully motioned for Flores-Ruiz’s attorney and a male she did not know (Attorney B
had never met Flores-Ruiz) to approach. Flores-Ruiz’s attorney appeared to be confused by the
judge’s gesture but complied with her directive. Judge DUGAN commanded Flores-Ruiz’s
attorney and the male to leave through a backdoor of the courtroom. Attorney B then saw Judge
DUGAN escort Flores-Ruiz’s attorney and the male through a non-public door near the
courtroom’s jury box. Shortly thereafter, Judge DUGAN came back to the courtroom and
conducted hearings on that morning’s docket. Later that morning, Attorney B realized that Flores-
Ruiz’s case had never been called and asked the court about it. Attorney B learned that Flores-
Ruiz’s case had been adjourned. This happened without Attorney B’s knowledge or participation,
even though Attorney B was present in court to handle Flores-Ruiz’s case on behalf of the state,
and even though victims were present in the courtroom.
31. A Victim Witness Specialist (VWS) employed by the Milwaukee County District
Attorney’s Office was present in Courtroom 615 on April 18, 2025. The VWS made contact with
the victims in Flores-Ruiz’s criminal case, who were also in court. The VWS was able to identify
Flores-Ruiz based upon the victims’ reactions to his presence in court. The VWS observed Judge DUGAN gesture towards Flores-Ruiz and an unknown Hispanic woman. The VWS stated she
believed the Hispanic woman may have been an interpreter. However, based on the VWS’s
description of the woman and other witness statements, I believe the Hispanic woman to which
the VWS referred was Flores-Ruiz’s attorney. The VWS stated that Judge DUGAN then exited
through the jury door with Flores-Ruiz and the Hispanic woman. The VWS was concerned because
Flores-Ruiz’s case had not yet been called, and the victims were waiting.
32. Another attorney (“Attorney C”), who was in Courtroom 615 on April 18, 2025, to
represent a client, also advised case agents that he observed Judge DUGAN forcefully direct two
individuals, a man and a woman, to leave through the jury door. Attorney C indicated that this was
done with a “stern” tone.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...111629.1.0.pdf
who all thinks its cool to do this?
https://calmatters.org/justice/2025/...ol-injunction/A federal court on Tuesday issued a preliminary injunction forbidding the Border Patrol from conducting warrantless immigration stops throughout a wide swath of California.
The ruling came in response to an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit filed after the El Centro Border Patrol traveled to Kern County to conduct a three-day sweep in January, detaining day laborers, farm workers and others in a Home Depot parking lot, outside a convenience store and along a highway between orchards.
The ruling prohibits Border Patrol agents from taking similar actions, restricting them from stopping people unless they have a reasonable su ion that the person is in violation of U.S. immigration law. It also bars agents from carrying out warrantless arrests unless they have probable cause that the person is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained.
“You just can’t walk up to people with brown skin and say, ‘Give me your papers,’” U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer L. Thurston said during a Monday hearing in Fresno that featured moments of heated exchange between government attorneys and the judge.
another L for Trumplandia
and a win for 1A
htps://www.wdsu.com/article/mohsen-mahdawi-palestinian-student-released-vermont/64634377A Palestinian college student has been released on conditions following weeks of detainment by federal agents.
Columbia student Mohsen Mahdawi was released from federal custody on Wednesday morning following a hearing at the federal courthouse in Burlington, Vermont.
Mahdawi will be allowed to keep permanent residency in Vermont and will still be allowed to go to New York City to attend school and graduate from Columbia University. He will also be allowed to meet with his legal team.
Sister station WPTZ was in the courtroom during the hearing. The judge in the case said that he did not believe that Mahdawi posed a risk to the public and also said that he was not a flight risk. The judge went on to say that he has heard from multiple people who know Mahdawi who all said he was peaceful.
The judge compared the recent period of migrants and immigrants being detained to the era of McCarthyism and the infamous "Red Scare," saying that those periods in American history are not ones we should be proud of.
What's the spin on that one, TSA?
Seems more like hemisboomer to me but in the end they're both derps any way
You calling anyone else the king of disinformation is extra richThe ST king of disinformation strikes again
Hard to see a crime when all you do is rely on and swallow whole screenshots from Bluesky and don't take the time to read the actual criminal complaint against Judge Dugan. Caught with your pants down again...will you ever learn?
Bolded is from her OWN courtroom deputy. She's ed.
D. Judge DUGAN escorts Flores-Ruiz through a “jury door” to avoid his arrest.
29. Multiple witnesses have described their observations after Judge DUGAN returned
to her courtroom after directing members of the arrest team to the Chief Judge’s office. For
example, the courtroom deputy recalled that upon the courtroom deputy’s return to the courtroom,
defense counsel for Flores-Ruiz was talking to the clerk, and Flores-Ruiz was seated in the jury
box, rather than in the gallery. The courtroom deputy believed that counsel and the clerk were
having an off-the-record conversation to pick the next court date. Defense counsel and Flores-Ruiz
then walked toward each other and toward the public courtroom exit. The courtroom deputy then
saw Judge DUGAN get up and heard Judge DUGAN say something like “Wait, come with me.”
10
Despite having been advised of the administrative warrant for the arrest of Flores-Ruiz, Judge
DUGAN then escorted Flores-Ruiz and his counsel out of the courtroom through the “jury door,”
which leads to a nonpublic area of the courthouse. These events were also unusual for two reasons.
First, the courtroom deputy had previously heard Judge DUGAN direct people not to sit in the jury
box because it was exclusively for the jury’s use. Second, according to the courtroom deputy, only
deputies, juries, court staff, and in-custody defendants being escorted by deputies used the back
jury door. Defense attorneys and defendants who were not in custody never used the jury door.
30. Attorney B similarly explained that after returning to the courtroom, Judge
DUGAN forcefully motioned for Flores-Ruiz’s attorney and a male she did not know (Attorney B
had never met Flores-Ruiz) to approach. Flores-Ruiz’s attorney appeared to be confused by the
judge’s gesture but complied with her directive. Judge DUGAN commanded Flores-Ruiz’s
attorney and the male to leave through a backdoor of the courtroom. Attorney B then saw Judge
DUGAN escort Flores-Ruiz’s attorney and the male through a non-public door near the
courtroom’s jury box. Shortly thereafter, Judge DUGAN came back to the courtroom and
conducted hearings on that morning’s docket. Later that morning, Attorney B realized that Flores-
Ruiz’s case had never been called and asked the court about it. Attorney B learned that Flores-
Ruiz’s case had been adjourned. This happened without Attorney B’s knowledge or participation,
even though Attorney B was present in court to handle Flores-Ruiz’s case on behalf of the state,
and even though victims were present in the courtroom.
31. A Victim Witness Specialist (VWS) employed by the Milwaukee County District
Attorney’s Office was present in Courtroom 615 on April 18, 2025. The VWS made contact with
the victims in Flores-Ruiz’s criminal case, who were also in court. The VWS was able to identify
Flores-Ruiz based upon the victims’ reactions to his presence in court. The VWS observed Judge DUGAN gesture towards Flores-Ruiz and an unknown Hispanic woman. The VWS stated she
believed the Hispanic woman may have been an interpreter. However, based on the VWS’s
description of the woman and other witness statements, I believe the Hispanic woman to which
the VWS referred was Flores-Ruiz’s attorney. The VWS stated that Judge DUGAN then exited
through the jury door with Flores-Ruiz and the Hispanic woman. The VWS was concerned because
Flores-Ruiz’s case had not yet been called, and the victims were waiting.
32. Another attorney (“Attorney C”), who was in Courtroom 615 on April 18, 2025, to
represent a client, also advised case agents that he observed Judge DUGAN forcefully direct two
individuals, a man and a woman, to leave through the jury door. Attorney C indicated that this was
done with a “stern” tone.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...111629.1.0.pdf
The case against Dugan is dog , Trumplandia will probably lose that one
In the Abrego case, discovery has been put back on the schedule. Trumplandia is facing contempt rulings with SCOTUS backing Xinis -- there's a nonzero chance Trumplandia will lose this too
The ST king of disinformation strikes again
Hard to see a crime when all you do is rely on and swallow whole screenshots from Bluesky and don't take the time to read the actual criminal complaint against Judge Dugan. Caught with your pants down again...will you ever learn?
Bolded is from her OWN courtroom deputy. She's ed.
D. Judge DUGAN escorts Flores-Ruiz through a “jury door” to avoid his arrest.
29. Multiple witnesses have described their observations after Judge DUGAN returned
to her courtroom after directing members of the arrest team to the Chief Judge’s office. For
example, the courtroom deputy recalled that upon the courtroom deputy’s return to the courtroom,
defense counsel for Flores-Ruiz was talking to the clerk, and Flores-Ruiz was seated in the jury
box, rather than in the gallery. The courtroom deputy believed that counsel and the clerk were
having an off-the-record conversation to pick the next court date. Defense counsel and Flores-Ruiz
then walked toward each other and toward the public courtroom exit. The courtroom deputy then
saw Judge DUGAN get up and heard Judge DUGAN say something like “Wait, come with me.”
10
Despite having been advised of the administrative warrant for the arrest of Flores-Ruiz, Judge
DUGAN then escorted Flores-Ruiz and his counsel out of the courtroom through the “jury door,”
which leads to a nonpublic area of the courthouse. These events were also unusual for two reasons.
First, the courtroom deputy had previously heard Judge DUGAN direct people not to sit in the jury
box because it was exclusively for the jury’s use. Second, according to the courtroom deputy, only
deputies, juries, court staff, and in-custody defendants being escorted by deputies used the back
jury door. Defense attorneys and defendants who were not in custody never used the jury door.
30. Attorney B similarly explained that after returning to the courtroom, Judge
DUGAN forcefully motioned for Flores-Ruiz’s attorney and a male she did not know (Attorney B
had never met Flores-Ruiz) to approach. Flores-Ruiz’s attorney appeared to be confused by the
judge’s gesture but complied with her directive. Judge DUGAN commanded Flores-Ruiz’s
attorney and the male to leave through a backdoor of the courtroom. Attorney B then saw Judge
DUGAN escort Flores-Ruiz’s attorney and the male through a non-public door near the
courtroom’s jury box. Shortly thereafter, Judge DUGAN came back to the courtroom and
conducted hearings on that morning’s docket. Later that morning, Attorney B realized that Flores-
Ruiz’s case had never been called and asked the court about it. Attorney B learned that Flores-
Ruiz’s case had been adjourned. This happened without Attorney B’s knowledge or participation,
even though Attorney B was present in court to handle Flores-Ruiz’s case on behalf of the state,
and even though victims were present in the courtroom.
31. A Victim Witness Specialist (VWS) employed by the Milwaukee County District
Attorney’s Office was present in Courtroom 615 on April 18, 2025. The VWS made contact with
the victims in Flores-Ruiz’s criminal case, who were also in court. The VWS was able to identify
Flores-Ruiz based upon the victims’ reactions to his presence in court. The VWS observed Judge DUGAN gesture towards Flores-Ruiz and an unknown Hispanic woman. The VWS stated she
believed the Hispanic woman may have been an interpreter. However, based on the VWS’s
description of the woman and other witness statements, I believe the Hispanic woman to which
the VWS referred was Flores-Ruiz’s attorney. The VWS stated that Judge DUGAN then exited
through the jury door with Flores-Ruiz and the Hispanic woman. The VWS was concerned because
Flores-Ruiz’s case had not yet been called, and the victims were waiting.
32. Another attorney (“Attorney C”), who was in Courtroom 615 on April 18, 2025, to
represent a client, also advised case agents that he observed Judge DUGAN forcefully direct two
individuals, a man and a woman, to leave through the jury door. Attorney C indicated that this was
done with a “stern” tone.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...111629.1.0.pdf
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
