A final thought on the topic, as I really don't wish to keep derailing this Castle thread with Primo bull ;
The reason why the judgment on the Primo pick irks me is that people have seen, time and time again, the Spurs succeed with the same exact process and philosophy, yet can only criticize the failed attempts without considering they're the necessary counterpart to their success stories.
Like, put draft slot aside for a second - wasn't Dejounte Murray a "scrub" when drafted as well? How many years did this forum run the Instagram Baller horse into the ground before he actually developed into a positive, All-Star level player, and shut everyone up? He's a serviceable player by all accounts and he's far from the Spurs' only successful "draft the hidden gem" example.
Point is, the Spurs follow a tried-and-true drafting philosophy and methods, that begets the Primo's and Samanic's and Lonnie's of the world, because the same philosophy also gets you the Dejounte's, the White's, the Castle's. You can argue the methods, but I honestly think the results speak for themselves in the end.
And again I say, to anyone faulting the Spurs for "not realizing" he was a sexual assaulter, please post forward your method, because society as a whole could reeeeally ing use that.