Page 20 of 38 FirstFirst ... 1016171819202122232430 ... LastLast
Results 476 to 500 of 926
  1. #476
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    No, I said I haven't watched much of Harper. What bugs me is that, from his scouting report, he's very redundant with Fox and Castle.
    Problem is there is no forward worth taking in the top 5 after Flagg. So if you're taking a guard I don't see how PG skills are anything but a plus. Especially when the next best guard, Edgecombe, is the same level of three point shooter Harper is.

  2. #477
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    Problem is there is no forward worth taking in the top 5 after Flagg. So if you're taking a guard I don't see how PG skills are anything but a plus. Especially when the next best guard, Edgecombe, is the same level of three point shooter Harper is.
    I wouldn't write Ace Bailey off yet, tbh.

  3. #478
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    4,089
    I wouldn't write Ace Bailey off yet, tbh.
    His height kinda scares me away from him tbh. It’s not that he’s short or anything but I was sold on him being 6’10. The fact that he’s 6’7 isn’t a good thing. A 6’10 guy with a high arching shot that can shoot over anybody imo is worth the 2 pick. A 6’7 guy however not so much.

    His flaws in his game are all fixable. But how good is our player development? That’s what I don’t know. I really wish we stopped being so damn cheap and did a complete overhaul in player development coaches and assistant coaches. Especially now with the number 2 pick. But we are a badly run franchise from the top down so not much to be said about it.

  4. #479
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    I wouldn't write Ace Bailey off yet, tbh.
    Drives me nuts seeing how little court vision Keldon has and Ace would be similar but you're also subtracting Keldon's ability to just bull his way to the rim. Just wouldn't be surprised to him be 2025 Whitmore (though no way he drops as far as 20). Was reading something in the Toronto Sun where they were discussing how there might be an outside chance to get Bailey with their #9 pick with how rapidly his stock has been falling at the combine.

  5. #480
    Movin’ Different fafo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2024
    Post Count
    45
    Wright somehow got Fox for Collins/Tre and superfluous picks, so I’m gonna hold out for a Giannis scam.

  6. #481
    Make a trade steal
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    12,058
    Damn is that the understatement of the year. Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine the Spurs would be in position to draft Harper after just getting Wemby and Castle. They probably do have an OKC level juggernaut now by taking Harper. Gonna be pretty ridiculous in 2-3 years having three guys with star PG skills on the floor with Wemby to close out playoff games.
    Yes, stay the course they have been on. Luck has been kind to them and the backcourt is set now for the future along with having Wemby all on the same timeline.

  7. #482
    Veteran Spursfanfromafar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    3,110
    As intimidating and amazing a frontline of Giannis & Wemby would be, I doubt that the Spurs will go in that direction, because they would have to give way too much for Giannis. I doubt if Giannis will leave Milwaukee, as well. Lets see.

    From all accounts (and videos that I have seen), Harper is a legitimate PG and an excellent prospect. The Spurs shouldn't overthink this. There is no need to trade down at all.. as all other prospects are at least a tier below Harper. Trading down is therefore ruled out. Harper's addition would mean that the Spurs will have Wemby, Castle and Harper on the same timeline and a star like Fox to build with.

    The Spurs must figure out a way to get a legitimate 3 and D player instead of Keldon who offers neither. Vassell is maddeningly inconsistent but he is a much better fit on paper with the four core players (Wemby, Castle, Harper and Fox) than Keldon is.

    So I think the way to do that is to dangle the 14th pick to the Nets along with Keldon for a lower FRP or maybe the 14th and the 38th for the lower of the two late FRPs that the Nets have plus Cam Johnson. And figure out a way to get a back-up for Wemby at C. (Porzingis can be had from the ailing Celtics for Barnes and Branham? I dont know).

  8. #483
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    Edgecombe and Harper are about the same as three point shooters. Shot nearly the same percentage on nearly the same volume. Sure Edgecombe is a better defender but it's really all he has on Harper. If Edgecombe had Harrison Barnes' size to play the 3 and some spot 4 this would be a much more interesting debate but he's not and the gap between the two is pretty sizeable IMO given Harper is a legit PG and huge for the position.
    I think Edgecombe's form is better than Harper and his athleticism is better as well. I think he'll be the better 3 point shooter in the league. Still, I have Harper ahead because of the other attributes he has. I just think is fairly close.

  9. #484
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    No, I said I haven't watched much of Harper. What bugs me is that, from his scouting report, he's very redundant with Fox and Castle.
    A few years ago, Sean was saying on the telecast that he asked Pop why they didn’t run certain plays any more. Pop flat out said that the players didn’t have the skills to run them.

    You might have a point if they were all 6’3”, Fox sized. The reality is that you can actually run them all together on the floor as a 1-3 combo. Having redundant high level PG skills guys that can occupy the floor at the same time doesn’t actually sound like a problem

  10. #485
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    Giannis is going to be an all chips in move that the Spurs have said they don't want to do. It's going to cost Harper maybe even Castle along with more draft picks.
    You will be trading a 10-15 year window for a 4 year win now window.

    Spurs have a history of not going for the all chips in type of moves.

    Spurs plan all along was being patient and build through the draft and luck has been on their side. It has worked great.
    I don't disagree with that. It is our history and our expected future. I just think due diligence requires looking under every rock to see what's out there. There's probably not a better way forward than just taking Harper, but they owe it to the franchise to make sure that's the case.

  11. #486
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    264
    the easiest and most logical strategy is always this: you do the things you can control.

    this means, you draft Harper and you keep Fox. do you extend Fox? yes.

    you have short term goals (next season and the season after): develop, make play offs. max for Fox (till 2030, 4th year PO), rookie scale for Wemby, Castle, Harper.
    medium term goals (seasons 2028 and 2029): 1st Championship of the Wemby era. 1st max/supermax for Wemby, Fox on max, rookie scale for Castle and Harper.
    long term goals (seasons 2030 to 2040): multiple championships of the Wemby dynasty. 2nd and 3rd max/supermax for Wemby, max for Harper and Castle. Fox is traded before 2030 season, or leaves as a FA 2029.

    if Fox doesn't work at all with Castle and Harper, you can always trade him as early as 2026 or 2027. at least you tried and you still gave him a good extension. noone will blame Spurs if they make the necessary moves in 2026.
    if things work according to plan, Fox will either leave the Spurs 2029 as FA, at age 31, or he chooses the be part of the dynasty for a pay cut.

    and no, this script doesn't have a role for Keldon and Vassell, likely not for Sochan. (unless he shows up next season as a shooter)

  12. #487
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Wright somehow got Fox for Collins/Tre and superfluous picks, so I’m gonna hold out for a Giannis scam.
    That was forced by Rich Paul.

  13. #488
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,916
    Damn is that the understatement of the year. Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine the Spurs would be in position to draft Harper after just getting Wemby and Castle. They probably do have an OKC level juggernaut now by taking Harper. Gonna be pretty ridiculous in 2-3 years having three guys with star PG skills on the floor with Wemby to close out playoff games.
    I keep looking at those Hawks picks. It's a shame that the West got so much better than the East so quickly, but all it takes is something happening to Trae and that swap or '27 looks mighty fine. Also liking the BOS28 swap.

  14. #489
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    I actually think TMIII fits great here short-term. You run a Fox, Castle or Harper, TMIII, Barnes, and Wemby lineup and bring one of Castle or Harper off the bench.
    If one of Castle or Harper is the 6th man, then I agree TMIII is a great fit. But I’m operating under the assumption that we’ll run them together with Castle at the 3. There is where my opinion that TMIII isn’t the right guy comes from.

    Lots of team construction possibilities.

  15. #490
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    If one of Castle or Harper is the 6th man, then I agree TMIII is a great fit. But I’m operating under the assumption that we’ll run them together with Castle at the 3. There is where my opinion that TMIII isn’t the right guy comes from.

    Lots of team construction possibilities.
    You know my opinion of Murphy, but getting a legit PF should be the priority.
    Barnes and Champ can do the job for a year until we figure everything out.
    Getting Murphy or another similar SF wouldn't solve our rebounding and paint presence issues.

    I know I'm boring, but there's no other way around it.
    AD, Gordon, Smith Jr, nephew, Lebron, JJJ, Randle, Zion, Chet, KD, Markkanen.
    Almost every team in the West has a PF that's either 6'10 or physical and plays above his size.
    Jeremy is the only one who can be a solid PF matchup, but he's offensively challenged and can't start.

    I'd be perfectly happy with Harper, legit starting PF, #14 used on the best PF or C prospect and a veteran backup big. That's all we need to have a functional roster.

  16. #491
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Because even if Harper was the best prospect ever, he still hasn't played a single NBA game. Nothing is guaranteed.
    We can't waste another season, we have to make the playoffs.
    If we don't take Harper or trade Fox/Castle, we'd need another point guard yet again. Castle isn't a true point guard, we need him and two more.
    Don't forget that self-creation and paint penetration was our biggest issue on offense last season before we got Fox.

    Castle was the only perimeter player who got to the rim with ease, but his FT% was subpar and his finishing at the rim wasn't ideal.
    Keldon's every drive was a roulette spin.
    CP3 had no legs left, didn't even have a layup attempt in most games.
    Wemby's isos were cringe most of the time.
    Others were all a net negative with the ball in their hands.

    Spurs 24-25 roster without CP3 needs another self-creator who can get to the rim at will.
    We need a point guard, but don't want to use significant cap space on one.
    Harper will be overqualified for the 6th man role, but he'll easily get 30mpg and if he's indeed the next star guard, he'll find himself in the starting lineup in no time.
    Idk why are you people overthinking this.

    We need every good player we can get.
    We want to make the playoffs, we have a rookie coach, can't leave him with a rookie and a sophmore as the only useful ballhandlers on the roster.
    For the sake of egos (and because it’s probably the right move anyway), you just start all 3 of Fox/Castle/Harper, but you get into your rotations early and those 3 are part of the starting and closing lineups (about 8 minutes a game worth together) and then the rest of the game they are just rotating so that two are on the court at all times?

  17. #492
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    As intimidating and amazing a frontline of Giannis & Wemby would be, I doubt that the Spurs will go in that direction, because they would have to give way too much for Giannis. I doubt if Giannis will leave Milwaukee, as well. Lets see.

    From all accounts (and videos that I have seen), Harper is a legitimate PG and an excellent prospect. The Spurs shouldn't overthink this. There is no need to trade down at all.. as all other prospects are at least a tier below Harper. Trading down is therefore ruled out. Harper's addition would mean that the Spurs will have Wemby, Castle and Harper on the same timeline and a star like Fox to build with.

    The Spurs must figure out a way to get a legitimate 3 and D player instead of Keldon who offers neither. Vassell is maddeningly inconsistent but he is a much better fit on paper with the four core players (Wemby, Castle, Harper and Fox) than Keldon is.

    So I think the way to do that is to dangle the 14th pick to the Nets along with Keldon for a lower FRP or maybe the 14th and the 38th for the lower of the two late FRPs that the Nets have plus Cam Johnson. And figure out a way to get a back-up for Wemby at C. (Porzingis can be had from the ailing Celtics for Barnes and Branham? I dont know).
    We need 3-and-D forwards galore. Cam Johnson is not a great defender and he's 30. I'm not trading picks for players older than 27. Just draft Carter Bryant or Fleming and hope they develop. Try to get John Collins for Keldon + Branham and a bunch of 2nd rounders.

  18. #493
    Veteran Baam's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    4,052
    For the sake of egos (and because it’s probably the right move anyway), you just start all 3 of Fox/Castle/Harper, but you get into your rotations early and those 3 are part of the starting and closing lineups (about 8 minutes a game worth together) and then the rest of the game they are just rotating so that two are on the court at all times?
    So you want to have the worst shooting position 1 through 3 in the league, got it. Gonna be funny in one year when no one makes the leap to above average shooter... I will be there to remind you all about the Harden talk.

  19. #494
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    I keep looking at those Hawks picks. It's a shame that the West got so much better than the East so quickly, but all it takes is something happening to Trae and that swap or '27 looks mighty fine. Also liking the BOS28 swap.
    It's going to be hard for the Hawks to not make the playoffs next year.

  20. #495
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Post Count
    66
    Edgecombe and Harper are about the same as three point shooters. Shot nearly the same percentage on nearly the same volume. Sure Edgecombe is a better defender but it's really all he has on Harper. If Edgecombe had Harrison Barnes' size to play the 3 and some spot 4 this would be a much more interesting debate but he's not and the gap between the two is pretty sizeable IMO given Harper is a legit PG and huge for the position.
    Just to help with the discussion this is what sporting news had in their chart on size reach etc
    Link if anyone wants to see the rest
    https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/...744275ba6c7166

    Player Height (without shoes) Weight (lbs) Wingspan Standing reach
    Cooper Flagg 6-7.75 221 7-0 8-10.5
    Dylan Harper 6-4.5 213.2 6-10.5 8-6
    VJ Edgecombe 6-4 193.2 6-7.5 8-5.5
    Ace Bailey 6-7.5 202.8 7-0.5 8-11
    Khaman Maluach 7-0.75 252.8 7-6.75 9-6
    Kon Knueppel 6-5 219 6-6.25 8-5.5
    Jeremiah Fears 6-2.5 179.6 6-5.25 8-2.5
    Kasparas Jakucionis 6-4.75 205.2 6-7.75 8-4
    Tre Johnson 6-4.75 190.4 6-10.25 8-5

  21. #496
    Believe. RedAzSa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Post Count
    30
    It's going to be hard for the Hawks to not make the playoffs next year.
    This is especially true if the Bucks trade Giannis for young pieces. There are just too many bad teams below them

  22. #497
    IWasNotFamiliarWithUrGame CorrectCrusader's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Post Count
    2,401
    No, I said I haven't watched much of Harper. What bugs me is that, from his scouting report, he's very redundant with Fox and Castle.
    They're redundant right out of the gate sure, but I don't expect to see them sharing the floor immediately. Harper will likely lead the bench unit next season if we draft him.
    We shouldn't be making any decisions about "fit" when we haven't even seen this team together healthy yet. Just draft Harper and take it slow with him, find out what he is and make your decisions from there. He hasn't even seen an NBA floor yet and we're all making these silly declarations as if they're written in stone.

  23. #498
    IWasNotFamiliarWithUrGame CorrectCrusader's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Post Count
    2,401
    It's going to be hard for the Hawks to not make the playoffs next year.
    Zero chance they don't. They're going to be getting better over the next few years not worse (excluding of course injuries). The east is actually horrific, especially with Giannis & Tatum potentially not being there next season.

  24. #499
    Why not?
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Post Count
    564
    Wright somehow got Fox for Collins/Tre and superfluous picks, so I’m gonna hold out for a Giannis scam.
    Fox forced his way to SA which is why it was cheap. Giannis is not likely to do the same. It's going to cost something like 2025 #2, 2025 #14, two future Spurs' unprotected firsts, the Atlanta first and swap, Vassell, and Barnes to get Giannis.

  25. #500
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    485
    Fox forced his way to SA which is why it was cheap. Giannis is not likely to do the same. It's going to cost something like 2025 #2, 2025 #14, two future Spurs' unprotected firsts, the Atlanta first and swap, Vassell, and Barnes to get Giannis.
    Just not worth paying that high on him. I think they “demand” Castle as well and take him out at the 11th hour to try to push a deal over the line. That being said, I don’t think they are going to get the bidding war they think they are; Houston has Amen off limits, Dallas seems ready to build with Flagg, and the dark horse of it all OKC has a solid chance to win the chip in a month which would take them out of the Giannis sweepstakes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •