After a week and some change of this move taking place I have started to feel a bit more positive about it. Having Mitch grow and learn as a head coach with a team that is young and unaccomplished and isn't quite saddled with massive expectations (outside of this forum anyway) yet could be end up paying dividends. The Spurs clearly want to follow that OKC Thunder trek that they started on 2 years ago. Mark Daigneault essentially just did what the Spurs are hoping Mitch can do under somewhat similar cir stances.
I also believe it was clearly a cost saving move which I can sort of understand; Mitch will be paid much less than what a Jenkins/Malone type would command and with Pop's massive salary on the books they were always going to be frugal with their HC hire unless perhaps it was thought the team was championship ready (which no 34 win team is).
I had plenty of Mitch complaints during the season (horrible 1st quarters, awful rebounding, bad sub patterns to name some big ones), hopefully with the team being officially his we can see him iron out the kinks. Looking at the situation objectively, the Spurs added 12 wins this year despite Wemby missing 36 games and openly tanking after the All Star break. That probably deserves giving him the spot for 2 seasons and seeing what we see. I do have concerns about our player development (or lack of) going forward, a lot of our young guys have stagnated and the coaching staff deserves blame there.
My main concern going forward with Mitch isn't necessarily even about Mitch, its about the front office/decision makers. If the team doesn't take the next step that is expected these next 2 years will they be willing to make the tough decision and bump out the homegrown culture guy Mitch or will they just ride him to perpetual mediocrity and an eventual Wemby exodus?