Page 164 of 210 FirstFirst ... 64114154160161162163164165166167168174 ... LastLast
Results 4,076 to 4,100 of 5246
  1. #4076
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    Are we adding draft capital? Or do we think TOR is just that high on Vassell? What is TOR's motivation for this?

    And then aren't we just creating more of a guard logjam? I don't see either of or Walter as capable of being viable option at SF. I'm a fan of Grady. Would have loved to pick him up in a pre-Harper world.
    I think ot depends on who is after who. Did Toronto approach us about Devin or did we approach them about RJ? I have a hard time seeing us being the initiator in this situation and if the want Devin and approached us we should be able to acquire an asset.

    As for the logjam issue, I think either of those guys could get minutes off the bench with either Castle playing 3 on D. I also think could make Sochan playable because of his shooting.

  2. #4077
    The Great Eight Ocotillo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,029

    A lot of folks are jumping to the conclusion of Barrett coming here but look at the other teams listed as interested. All of Brian's recent trading buddies. Maybe we end up being part of a facilitator in a deal rather than a Devin for R.J. type of move.

  3. #4078
    Formerly Spurs21 KingKev's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    5,928
    Don’t understand the speculated interest in Barrett although he is twice the player Vassell is.

  4. #4079
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    A lot of folks are jumping to the conclusion of Barrett coming here but look at the other teams listed as interested. All of Brian's recent trading buddies. Maybe we end up being part of a facilitator in a deal rather than a Devin for R.J. type of move.
    I don't like being lumped in with the FOs we keep fleecing. I like your idea of facilitating such a trade much more. Picking up another swap and a useful role player like in the Barnes trade would be awesome.

  5. #4080
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    A lot of folks are jumping to the conclusion of Barrett coming here but look at the other teams listed as interested. All of Brian's recent trading buddies. Maybe we end up being part of a facilitator in a deal rather than a Devin for R.J. type of move.
    Astute observation. They could also be using us to drive up the price on the dumb dumbs

  6. #4081
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    ATL: Barrett
    TOR: Vassell
    SAS: Risacher/Niang

    Bring Risacher home

  7. #4082
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    ATL: Barrett
    TOR: Vassell
    SAS: Risacher/Niang

    Bring Risacher home
    I wish Atlanta would do that...

  8. #4083
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    ATL: Barrett
    TOR: Vassell
    SAS: Risacher/Niang

    Bring Risacher home
    There's a thread on RGM for the Spurs trading Castle for Risacher. I don't think the Spurs should do that, but it's far closer than this.

    A number of trade ideas on here have assigned Vassell the value of a top-10 pick. It's bonkers that folks can think so highly of him but the Spurs can afford to trade him.

  9. #4084
    Veteran Degoat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    4,291
    My main problem with Vassell is it always seems like he plays his best ball in meaningless games, when everyone is healthy and available he doesn’t bring much to the table. I still believe he is a big talent that could be a 3rd option for a contender I just don’t know if that’s ever going to happen for us.


    I think he starts at SF next year in a make or break year for him,
    Fox
    Harper
    Vassell
    Sochan
    Wemby

    kinda think Castle is the 6th man

  10. #4085
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    There's a thread on RGM for the Spurs trading Castle for Risacher. I don't think the Spurs should do that, but it's far closer than this.

    A number of trade ideas on here have assigned Vassell the value of a top-10 pick. It's bonkers that folks can think so highly of him but the Spurs can afford to trade him.
    I was kinda being facetious. I actually liked Risacher in that turdy draft (even as I was head over heels for Castle).

    I’m sure you can nonetheless appreciate that there may be other reasons why Vassell would have positive value and still be expendable— not least of which that we are about to draft his replacement. I said this elsewhere: I do think Dev has more value around the league than the average person on ST does. Maybe not the value of this trade, but i don’t see him as salary ballast either like most here seem to.

  11. #4086
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    ^ actually an interesting thought exercise: if you were to merge this and last year’s draft, does Zach Risacher go Top 10?

    It’s an unfair question since we’re seen a year of the 24 class, but it would be a closer call than we think would be my guess. I think Castle still goes Top 5 though.

  12. #4087
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    I was kinda being facetious. I actually liked Risacher in that turdy draft (even as I was head over heels for Castle).

    I’m sure you can nonetheless appreciate that there may be other reasons why Vassell would have positive value and still be expendable— not least of which that we are about to draft his replacement. I said this elsewhere: I do think Dev has more value around the league than the average person on ST does. Maybe not the value of this trade, but i don’t see him as salary ballast either like most here seem to.
    It's fascinating because Vassell's trade value is either overly inflated by his supporter fans, or massively undervalued by his haters. I'm one of his haters, but I still think he has some value.

    ^ actually an interesting thought exercise: if you were to merge this and last year’s draft, does Zach Risacher go Top 10?

    It’s an unfair question since we’re seen a year of the 24 class, but it would be a closer call than we think would be my guess. I think Castle still goes Top 5 though.
    Here is my guess if you blended the two classes and knew what you knew now about the players (which I think is what you're asking)

    1. Flagg
    2. Harper
    3. Castle
    4. Sarr
    5. Bailey
    6. Edgecomb
    7. Risacher
    8. Tre Johnson
    9. Sheppard
    10. Knueppel

    I saw a thread on Reddit where folks were claiming Harper would go 3rd in a redraft of all the classes since 2019, but I think it would go more like this (drafted players as prospects at the time, not what we know now). The big debate for me is where we think Paolo/Chet/Jabari go.

    1. Wemby
    2. Zion
    3. Flagg
    4. Cade
    5. Paolo
    6. Chet
    7. Ja
    8. Harper
    9. Ant
    10. Melo
    11. Sarr
    12. Scoot
    13. Jabari
    14. Amen

    This feels about right to me... but of course memories can get hazy

  13. #4088
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    It's fascinating because Vassell's trade value is either overly inflated by his supporter fans, or massively undervalued by his haters. I'm one of his haters, but I still think he has some value.



    Here is my guess if you blended the two classes and knew what you knew now about the players (which I think is what you're asking)

    1. Flagg
    2. Harper
    3. Castle
    4. Sarr
    5. Bailey
    6. Edgecomb
    7. Risacher
    8. Tre Johnson
    9. Sheppard
    10. Knueppel

    I saw a thread on Reddit where folks were claiming Harper would go 3rd in a redraft of all the classes since 2019, but I think it would go more like this (drafted players as prospects at the time, not what we know now). The big debate for me is where we think Paolo/Chet/Jabari go.

    1. Wemby
    2. Zion
    3. Flagg
    4. Cade
    5. Paolo
    6. Chet
    7. Ja
    8. Harper
    9. Ant
    10. Melo
    11. Sarr
    12. Scoot
    13. Jabari
    14. Amen

    This feels about right to me... but of course memories can get hazy
    Ant easily goes over Harper knowing what we know. I would trade pick 2 for Ant easily

  14. #4089
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Ant easily goes over Harper knowing what we know. I would trade pick 2 for Ant easily
    Yeah, I'm ranking them not knowing what we know, but how they were viewed at the time... which is why I'm not so sure about Paolo/Chet. There was certainly a lot of talk about Jabari at #1 but I always considered Paolo and Chet to be the clear #1 and #2... but I might have been higher on them than consensus.

  15. #4090
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Yeah, I'm ranking them not knowing what we know, but how they were viewed at the time... which is why I'm not so sure about Paolo/Chet. There was certainly a lot of talk about Jabari at #1 but I always considered Paolo and Chet to be the clear #1 and #2... but I might have been higher on them than consensus.
    ahhh I gotcha. I was like dude lol Ant is way too low here lol

  16. #4091
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    ahhh I gotcha. I was like dude lol Ant is way too low here lol
    Yeah, Ant's gotta be #2 behind Wemby if it's a "what we know now" - right?

  17. #4092
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    ^ I like your list, Scott. I’d probably have it as a coin flip between ZR and Tre Johnson. And I don’t think Kon would have been a distant 9th either.

  18. #4093
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Yeah, Ant's gotta be #2 behind Wemby if it's a "what we know now" - right?
    Yup. I only read your first list about “knowing what we know now” and glossed over the part you inserted the difference for list 2. I was like Zion at 2??

  19. #4094
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Another fun list:

    Starting at the bottom of the first round of this draft and working up, how far up do you get before a team refuses to trade its FRP (plus matching salary ballast) for Devin?

  20. #4095
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    Are we adding draft capital? Or do we think TOR is just that high on Vassell? What is TOR's motivation for this?

    And then aren't we just creating more of a guard logjam? I don't see either of or Walter as capable of being viable option at SF. I'm a fan of Grady. Would have loved to pick him up in a pre-Harper world.
    I doubt it would be for Devin (if we are even interested). I'd assume it's either Barnes cause he's expiring or maybe even Keldon plus Branham or Wesley. Seems like Toronto just wants to get rid of that salary. That being said the whole deal doesn't make much sense to me, unless you get dude for pennies.

  21. #4096
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    Yup, that part. Kuminga should be gettable for the MLE, 14 million.
    Yeah, right. If RJ Barett is doing that kind of , then I don't want him anywhere near the Spurs (even if it means getting off of Devin's remaining years of his contract, I'd rather keep Devin if that were the case). It looks like I am going to have to look this up as I see BatManu20 posted a tweet that the Spurs are showing interest in him (not sure if that Cris Davis guy has any real sources or where he heard it from).

    As for Kuminga, I wasn't sure what he was looking for. I was vaguely remembering $150M+, but wasn't sure until I read BG_Spurs_Fan mention it in a post above. What a screwup it was turning that amount of money down. Why would he have turned that down? I wonder what he thought he was worth? Did he think the Warriors had no options and they'd have to sign him for a higher amount?

    ATL: Barrett
    TOR: Vassell
    SAS: Risacher/Niang

    Bring Risacher home
    Why would Atlanta want Barrett over Risacher?

    There's a thread on RGM for the Spurs trading Castle for Risacher. I don't think the Spurs should do that, but it's far closer than this.

    A number of trade ideas on here have assigned Vassell the value of a top-10 pick. It's bonkers that folks can think so highly of him but the Spurs can afford to trade him.
    Who was this proposal by at RGM? Spurs fans (to balance out the roster) or Atlanta fans? I'd never trade Castle for Risacher.

  22. #4097
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Who was this proposal by at RGM? Spurs fans (to balance out the roster) or Atlanta fans? I'd never trade Castle for Risacher.
    A Dallas fan, actually. It was an AD-to-ATL trade where the Hawks got the Spurs to trade Castle for Risacher to get SA a wing and Dallas a guard.

    I wouldn't make the deal, but I could definitely see it being a deal the Spurs could wind up regret not making at some point.

  23. #4098
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    In thinking about it:

    How would you feel about 14 + Dev for Cam + 19 + 26

    BKY gets the younger guard under contract + the move up into additional lottery pick. Spurs get out of possible guard logjam (if they are taking Harper, and now have Fox, Castle and Harper)

    Dev for Cam seems more than fair to me (I value Dev more than Cam due to age and overall upside) and BKY give up pick 26 to move from 19 to 14?

  24. #4099
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    I'd do that deal

  25. #4100
    Forum Official Personal Life Coach BacktoBasics's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    11,318
    I'd do that deal
    I don't hate it either. Not sure about the Barrett talk though. I really don't value him all that much.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •