I'd consider both, but I have Carter Bryant higher for a few reasons, the most important of which is that I see more potential for growth for Bryant, has shown more flashes of passing upside he might develop some on ball game. Fleming's length is enticing but he looks pretty much capped at energy guy as a "stretch" 4, and by that I mean I don't fully trust a one season outlier sample, plenty of examples of regressing to the mean. Also Bryant looks more fluid to Fleming's gangly style. With that said, both could end up valuable contributors if the shot is real, but neither I feel so confident in that I would pay to move up or stay put if Spurs got a nice offer (say, 14 for 16 + 25 or 19 + 26)

Reply With Quote