..."But I'm President...and their not."
Jes trying to move det Overton window.
right, it's a contemporary controversy now
NYT op-eds to follow.
Cruz got fried, Tucker made him look like a ditz -- and he is
A half-prepared reporter could do this to Trump any day of the week
But it's considered a breach of protocol (and rather nasty) for the press to ask direct questions and to follow them up briskly
https://www.thedailybeast.com/ted-cr...oment/?via=iosCarlson asks Cruz, “How many people live in Iran by the way?” Cruz responds, “I don’t know the population.”
“You don’t know the population of the country you seek to topple?,” Carlson insists?
Cruz shot back, “I don’t sit around memorizing population tables.”
Carlson stated, “Well, it’s kinda relevant because you’re calling for the overthrow of the Government.”
The two men then argue about the “ethnic mix” of Iran, which leads to Cruz shouting, “I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran!”
Carlson retorts, “No you’re a Senator who is calling to overthrow the country and you don’t know anything about the country!”
“I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran!”
what does that even mean?
Cruz did a Kinsley gaffe where he said "we" in reference to the Israeli aerial campaign in Iran“I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran!”
Carlson immediately contrasted that with the official line and made Cruz waffle on camera trying walk it back
they knew
is Trump running the Reconstruction in reverse?
(the colloquy of these two in the Congressional Globe is highly arch and semi-restrained)
ackshully the original intent
is the literal opposite of the words of the Amendment
nobody knew what the 14th Amendment ackshully means 'til just now
A Florida professor can't have the word "race" in her course le because that's illegal DEI
but a student from the same university wins a prize for his essay, because the KKK/Nathan Bedford Forrest theory of the US Cons ution -- that it enshrines a white man's government -- is protected free speech
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/21/u...smid=url-share
Let me guess, you see white supremacy everywhere...
the guy who wrote the essay actually said that "it wouldn't be manifestly wrong" to call him a neo-NaziLet me guess, you see white supremacy everywhere...
but leaving that aside, someone who says Dred Scott was correct but didn't go far enough is most probably a white supremacist
Good thing I don't read any of your linked articles then. What are you doing reading and spreading blatant white supremacist propaganda?
Btw, lol being worried over a dumb student's paper but not a propagandist professor paid by our tax $ more than likely. You're out of touch with reality bro.
Just pointing out a sign of the times
White supremacy is now free speech
And merely mentioning civil rights for anyone else is "illegal DEI"
You say this as if that professor is really merely mentioning civil rights. From what I've seen coming out of education from grade school to college has been nothing less than propaganda, lies, gay/trans , and most of all Marxist bs. You can't convince me otherwise that that professor was just wanting to "teach".
Btw white supremacy talk/text has always been free speech just like black supremacy and more. It's up to you to be a man and not turn into a drama queen over your hurt feelings. Doesn't mean either train of thought it good, just means you need to grow thicker skin and manage your feelings.
You're ignoring Trumplandia's top down censorship of the whole of government to eradicate civil rights policy within government and using federal transfers to compel private businesses and ins utions to abandon DEI outside of it
Under Trump, white supremacy is protected speech, but speech against it isn't
basically a pro-lynching cons ution
Hyperbole. Sorry your cult of re ation is losing more than the Knicks over the past 30 yrs.
no, you're just kind of low information and dense
When you've got nothing, always pull out the "basically".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
