Page 197 of 210 FirstFirst ... 97147187193194195196197198199200201207 ... LastLast
Results 4,901 to 4,925 of 5246
  1. #4901
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    You thinking RJ + 9 for Devin + 14?
    I’m doing that in a heartbeat if I’m the Spurs. Don’t think the Raps would.

    RJ is no world beater but he’s better than Devin imo and contracts are similar. And he fits better being able to play the 3 with his size.

  2. #4902
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    You do this if there is a target in mind. Issue is I don’t have a sense of RJ’s game vis-a-vis Dev. Is Dev’s descending contract appealing to Toronto, who has cap issues?
    Yeah...the 2 year shorter contract opens up a few more options for us and the descending figure on Devin's should appeal to them.

  3. #4903
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    No I‘m thinking Keldon, Branham and 14 for Barrett and 9.

    Either Keldon or Barnes. Now Barrett has improved a lot on the Raptors and his stock still dropped. His 3-point shooting is ok. He‘s only shooting 35%, but on high volume. What worries me is the 63% FT shooting. He made huge leaps playmaking wise.

    Raptors want to move him because they are only 9 million below the tax. Question is what is their asking price? It should be low, but I think we might have to throw in a future first.
    This would be a way to grab Maluach.
    There's no world where I'd give a future 1st to move up 5 spots.

  4. #4904
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    There's no world where I'd give a future 1st to move up 5 spots.
    me neither. The first would be for Barrett basically. As I said I have no clue what they want. Maybe 2nd rounders get the job done.

    I don’t think it’s Vassell. He doesn’t save them salary. They could just waive Branham. Buy out Barnes. And the trade down saves them money too.

  5. #4905
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    5,568
    I am still beating the drum for Herb Jones, hopefully is injury drops his price, but an elite defensive presence is needed on the team, he would be who we would put on the SGA's and Luka's of the world and not worry about his defensive effort affecting what he gives us on offense but any offense we get from him would be seen as a bonus. Herb Jones would alleviate the need for out core players to possibly get in foul trouble covering the other teams best scorer. Maybe #38 and some future draft capitol, or maybe Sohan can get it done but tbh if you were to tell me we could get Herb Jones with #14, I would be surprised if we could land a player as good that could contribute as fast as Herb would.

  6. #4906
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    I’m doing that in a heartbeat if I’m the Spurs. Don’t think the Raps would.

    RJ is no world beater but he’s better than Devin imo and contracts are similar. And he fits better being able to play the 3 with his size.
    Barrett is literally the exact archetype the Spurs don't need. Big contract, high usage/low efficiency empty calories type and middling defender.

    Sure, his 3/2 frame would fit better than Vassell's 2/3 frame at the 3, but that and the gap between 9 and 14 is not enough to offset the rest.

  7. #4907
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    I’m doing that in a heartbeat if I’m the Spurs. Don’t think the Raps would.

    RJ is no world beater but he’s better than Devin imo and contracts are similar. And he fits better being able to play the 3 with his size.
    It gets them a little future cap space wiggle room. If they need more now you might have to absorb another contract like ochai. The fit is better for both too, as you said.

  8. #4908
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    I thought we were using the other thread for spurs offseason talk. Did i misread
    If you are referring to the NBA Offseason Thread... that is intended more for just general, around the league offseason updates - not just Spurs.

  9. #4909
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    Wasn‘t Barrett managed by Klutch Sports before he got traded to Canada?

  10. #4910
    Veteran SpursFan86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    5,159
    I really think the only wings we need are 3&D, low usage types. With our guard rotation + Wemby, it just seems unnecessary to add any more players that need the ball in their hands to really be valuable. Hard pass on Barrett tbh.

  11. #4911
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    No I‘m thinking Keldon, Branham and 14 for Barrett and 9.
    Does Barrett have warrants out for his arrest in Canada? Why would TOR do this?

    Why not just trade Keldon, Branham and 14 for Giannis?

  12. #4912
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    Does Barrett have warrants out for his arrest in Canada? Why would TOR do this?

    Why not just trade Keldon, Branham and 14 for Giannis?
    Raptors have 178 Million on the books before the draft for a bunch of mediocre players. Luxury tax line is 187. They already have Barnes and Ingram. They don’t need Barrett. I just don’t know what they want in return.

  13. #4913
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Raptors have 178 Million on the books before the draft for a bunch of mediocre players. Luxury tax line is 187. They already have Barnes and Ingram. They don’t need Barrett. I just don’t what they want.
    Well they sure as don't want Keldon and Branham, and certainly not enough to drop back 5 spots for the privilege.

  14. #4914
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    That‘s why I‘m saying they might want future draft capital added to that. I don’t expect any team to value our garbage. I just hope this ain‘t the move the Spurs want to make while letting KD go to the Rockets. I might destroy my TV on draft night if this happens.

  15. #4915
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    3,509
    I wonder how some of you people make it through life without going bankrupt on daily basis, tbh.
    I wonder the same thing about you people who somehow have Harper pegged as some future franchise player but in real life he couldn't even get Rutgers to a .500 record.

  16. #4916
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    I wonder the same thing about you people who somehow have Harper pegged as some future franchise player but in real life he couldn't even get Rutgers to a .500 record.
    You're making an early candidacy for the worst spurstalk user of the season, tbh.

  17. #4917
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    Fox, Harper
    Castle, NAW
    RJ,
    Santi or Collins/Sochan
    Wemby/Maluach

  18. #4918
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Fox, Harper
    Castle, NAW
    RJ,
    Santi or Collins/Sochan
    Wemby/Maluach
    That's not bad at all... and you successfully shipped out Vasselldon in one offseason... but this wouldn't be my favorite offseason. Wouldn't hate it though.

  19. #4919
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,167
    Sorry, RJ Barrett? No way. He is a 2 playing the 3. He is a so so shooter. Below avg defender. Needs self creation.

  20. #4920
    Seek True Love, within. bigzak25's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Post Count
    11,293
    to set the record straight, this means you wouldnt still trade for Giannis
    I trust the Spurs to do what they think is best.

  21. #4921
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Mavs extended gafford so we can stop pretending they will trade him away for cheap now

    Davis has been very clear about not liking playing C and Dallas will go out of their way to placate him

  22. #4922
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    I’m doing that in a heartbeat if I’m the Spurs. Don’t think the Raps would.

    RJ is no world beater but he’s better than Devin imo and contracts are similar. And he fits better being able to play the 3 with his size.
    Doing that to get Barrett and then drafting Malauch would be a of a move.

    100% doubt Toronto would do it however

  23. #4923
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Does Barrett have warrants out for his arrest in Canada? Why would TOR do this?

    Why not just trade Keldon, Branham and 14 for Giannis?
    I think there is a trade for Barrett if the Spurs want it. I definitely don’t think it involves #9 though.

  24. #4924
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    I still think the Cavs are a key team to watch. Spurs could get involved in basic framework like this:

    Team X: Garland
    CLE: Vassell
    SAS: Player

  25. #4925
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    SA Gets: Claxton + Cam Johnson

    BKY Gets: Vassell + Keldon + Branham + 14 + 5 2nds

    If BKY views Vassell as equal to Claxton, does Keldon + 14 + 5 2nds get Cam?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •