Reply With Quote
please leave you're ty
Don’t want to hear negativity about DDR when he has more fight in him than the fan base
please leave you're ty
Sure, because there were absolutely no finesse players or mid range scorers in the 90's.it's really unbelievable
In people believing that Demar and Aldridge would have done something in the 90's when physicality was real, they would be even more embarrassed than they are now.
You idiots can't have it both ways. Complain that our two main stars have an archaic, mid-range, 90's based game then turnaround and say that neither could have succeeded in said era.
Neither would be a superstar, but their games would be far more conducive and effective in that era. To say otherwise is just stupid, trolling nonsense.
Oh wait......
Exactly son, both are true, so it is important to watch games rather than repeat what you hear as a parrot.
No, unless you have a ing time machine that isn't "true." It is just an opinion that has no real basis in reality or evidence. Just meaningless catch - all phrases like "soft" or "loser" that don't state how they couldn't have thrived in that era. Again, come with some substance to back up your inane opinion.
We will agree on this, but do you know what is insane? someone who says "this team would have destroyed in the 1990s" based on what they are watching today with no "substance" to support that statement.
-the great Derrick White regaining the spot that is rightfully his
- inelli getting benched
I'm back, boys. For now.
Can't believe they had Kevin ing Durant begging them to come here and they said "nah we're good"
I quit again
No one cares, and likely no one believes you since you quit before and didn’t stick with it.Can't believe they had Kevin ing Durant begging them to come here and they said "nah we're good"
I quit again
This isn't an airport, you don't need to announce your departure.
timvp cares imo
Haven't you heard? He's dead.
He’s dead. Didn’t you hear?
Are y'all ing with me? 😳
How did you not know this? Have you seen a timvp post lately?
lets assume Green and Vassell have comparable value... Brooks is a better player than HB and his salaries are descending. suns also really needed better defense at the forward spot (other than Dunn). then of course, #10 pick is going to have more value than the #14 pick, and its not like we could just throw in a few SRP to even it out since HOU threw out 5
the reported VD + HB + 14 package wouldnt have beathen this version of the offer that includes Brooks. unless we threw in sochan as well. as much as i have reservations about sochan (well do ented), his fit alongside durant actually would have been pretty interesting
Last edited by spurraider21; 06-23-2025 at 02:09 PM.
Which of these guys is also (temporarily) quitting SpursTalk?
KD's alts have gone silent.
Another 1st Rd pick?
at that point it stops being worth it
Lol why? Another teens to early 20s first round pick is the difference between going out and grabbing a generational talent, who is willing to take less on his extension? That's crazy.
You really aren't following the situation, are you?
We traded away '27 already, meaning we can't trade '26 or '28.
You don't trade away '29 for a player who will be done by then when your franchise player still hasn't played a game after suffering a serious blood clot issue.
Dont they still have ATL's '27 pick? And why does trading away their own '27 make '26 and '28 so untouchable?
You want to trade a pick that's likely to be in the lottery because Hawks are a dumpster tier franchise that always s it up?
Stepien rule, can't trade away FRPs in consecutive years.And why does trading away their own '27 make '26 and '28 so untouchable?
'26 also has ATL swap attached and '28 has BOS swap attached. Those can be valuable.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
