Civil War in reverse
Rolling back the Reconstruction Cons ution
The Court’s decision today is not the first to so weaken the landmark civil rights protections that Congress enacted during the Reconstruction Era. See, e.g., Civil Rights Cases, 109 U. S. 3 (1883); United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 (1876); Blyew v. United States, 13 Wall. 581 (1872). That means we do have a sense of what comes next: as with those past rulings, today’s decision is likely to result in tangible harm to real people. At a minimum, it will deprive Medicaid recipients in South Carolina of their only meaningful way of enforcing a right that Congress has expressly granted to them. And, more concretely, it will strip those South Carolinians—and countless other Medicaid recipients around the country—of a deeply personal freedom: the “ability to decide who treats us at our most vulnerable.” Kerr, 95 F. 4th, at 169. The Court today disregards Congress’s express desire to prevent that very outcome.
Last edited by Winehole23; 06-26-2025 at 09:51 PM.
SCOTUS hamstrings the judiciary's ability to rein in an extreme and out of control executive branch
Trump's birthright citizenship EO will go into effect for "anyone not a plaintiff"
MAGA has zero problems with Mark Kacsmaryk's nationwide injunctions -- another heads I win, tails you lose Supreme Court ruling
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...4a884_8n59.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...4a884_8n59.pdf
Left wing lying lawless judges told to stfu.
You lose
America wins
You win
America loses
That's the formula
Drinking liberal tears
So refreshing
You believe in nothing.
SCOTUS affirms phobia as a core tenet of Christian belief, rules that schools must provide an opt-out for gay-inclusive storybooks
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...4-297_4f14.pdf
important caveat, agency action can still be vacated
During the 2022–2023 school year, the Montgomery County Board of Ed-
ucation (Board) introduced a variety of “LGBTQ+-inclusive” texts into
the public school curriculum. Those texts included five “LGBTQ+-in-
clusive” storybooks approved for students in kindergarten through
fifth grade, which have story lines focused on sexuality and gender.
When parents in Montgomery County sought to have their children
excused from instruction involving those books, the Board initially
compromised with the parents by notifying them when the “LGBTQ+-
inclusive” storybooks would be taught and permitting their children to
be excused from the instruction. That compromise was consistent with
the Board’s “Guidelines for Respecting Religious Diversity,” which pro-
fessed a commitment to making “reasonable accommodations” for the
religious “beliefs and practices” of students. Less than a year after the
Board introduced the books, however, it rescinded the parental opt out
policy.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...4-297_4f14.pdf
what ing bull
Oh but I do
I believe
You lose
America wins
SCOTUS reined in out of control judges.
age screening in Texas for porn websites is now halal, opinion by Justice Thomas
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...-1122_3e04.pdf
Nah. That's just fear and hatred of someone you don't know.
You have no actual beliefs.
How were they out of control?SCOTUS reined in out of control judges.
So if a kid's religion doesn't believe in science, that kid can just opt out of the subject completely with no consequences?
Based.
SCOTUS punts the Louisiana racial gerrymander, requests new arguments
heckler's veto, raised to cons utional principle
Fear?
Lol
Absolutely.
You Trump s are afraid of nearly everything.
"my church doesn't believe in the mixing of the races"
Trump can't be stopped
It's the law
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
