Will TACO fold again?

[ChumpDumper]

You don't want jobs and tax revenues?

We had those without your dumbass tariffs.

[DMX7]

ABC News 6/26/25: GE Appliances (Owned by CHINA!) moves some production from China to Kentucky with $490M investment

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wire...ucky-123235653

[DMX7]

We had those without your dumbass tariffs.

The country is going broke.

[ChumpDumper]

ABC News 6/26/25: GE Appliances (Owned by CHINA!) moves some production from China to Kentucky with $490M investment

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wire...ucky-123235653

How much more will they cost?

[ChumpDumper]

The country is going broke.

Nope.

It's taxing the wrong people the wrong rates.

[DMX7]

How much more will they cost?

I think you and most people will be just fine.

[ChumpDumper]

I think you and most people will be just fine.

That is not an answer.

How much more will they cost?

[SnakeBoy]

You're for a high regressive sales tax on all imports?

Was that your Berniebro stance?

What was your Bidenbro stance?

[ChumpDumper]

What was your Bidenbro stance?

Not chaos.

you can't even say you support Trump's policies and actions.

#SnacksSoScared

[SnakeBoy]

BofA's take on the poll question

Tariffs and tax cuts are inextricably linked
We have long held the view that one of the goals of the impending fiscal package is to offset the growth headwind from tariffs. The key question is around timing: will fiscal stimulus arrive soon enough to head off a tariff-driven slowdown? With both Republicans' target date for the fiscal bill (July 4) and the end of the 90-day pause on the 'Liberation Day' tariffs (July 9) looming, this "timing problem" sets up some interesting permutations over the next two weeks.
"Bad" news on fiscal could mean good news on tariffs…
Our base case is that it will take until late July for the OBBBA to get passed. If that's correct (in particular, if the bill isn't done by July 9), we see a greater chance of a blanket extension of the tariff pause. The administration might prefer to revisit the April 2 tariff rates, which were close to embargo levels for some countries, after locking in a tailwind from fiscal stimulus.
… But good news on fiscal could mean bad news on tariffs
But if the tax bill gets passed by July 4, we think investors should brace themselves for a bumpy ride around the July 9 deadline. The administration might then feel more emboldened to up the ante on tariffs, particularly against countries or regions it feels have not negotiated in "good faith" (to quote Treasury Secretary Bessent). Among the US's major trade allies, the EU appears most vulnerable to higher tariffs as it seems to have made the least progress in trade negotiations.

[DMX7]

That is not an answer.

How much more will they cost?

You're going to find out soon enough and I think you're going to be just fine... just fine.

[ChumpDumper]

You're going to find out soon enough and I think you're going to be just fine... just fine.

But this does nothing for your claimed debt concerns.

It's all for nothing.

That won't be just fine, will it?

You make no sense.

[ChumpDumper]

BofA's take on the poll question

Tariffs and tax cuts are inextricably linked
We have long held the view that one of the goals of the impending fiscal package is to offset the growth headwind from tariffs. The key question is around timing: will fiscal stimulus arrive soon enough to head off a tariff-driven slowdown? With both Republicans' target date for the fiscal bill (July 4) and the end of the 90-day pause on the 'Liberation Day' tariffs (July 9) looming, this "timing problem" sets up some interesting permutations over the next two weeks.
"Bad" news on fiscal could mean good news on tariffs…
Our base case is that it will take until late July for the OBBBA to get passed. If that's correct (in particular, if the bill isn't done by July 9), we see a greater chance of a blanket extension of the tariff pause. The administration might prefer to revisit the April 2 tariff rates, which were close to embargo levels for some countries, after locking in a tailwind from fiscal stimulus.
… But good news on fiscal could mean bad news on tariffs
But if the tax bill gets passed by July 4, we think investors should brace themselves for a bumpy ride around the July 9 deadline. The administration might then feel more emboldened to up the ante on tariffs, particularly against countries or regions it feels have not negotiated in "good faith" (to quote Treasury Secretary Bessent). Among the US's major trade allies, the EU appears most vulnerable to higher tariffs as it seems to have made the least progress in trade negotiations.

Trump just said it's not a deadline.

He won't pick a lane.

[SnakeBoy]

Not chaos.

you can't even say you support Trump's policies and actions.

#SnacksSoScared

lol you don't want to talk about it, you never do

[FrostKing]

Nope.

It's taxing the wrong people the wrong rates.

"These taxes are dumb but those taxes will save us"

[ChumpDumper]

lol you don't want to talk about it, you never do

I just told you.

What is wrong with you?

Are you really this stupid?

[DMX7]

What was your Bidenbro stance?

Wasn't Bernie anti-NAFTA and pro-tariffs? Of course not after Trump does them.

[ChumpDumper]

"These taxes are dumb but those taxes will save us"

What's your tax rate where you say you live?

[FrostKing]

What's your tax rate where you say you live?

Quite high. But if USA is to be this import paradise then I think taxes should be low.

[DMX7]

But this does nothing for your claimed debt concerns.

It's all for nothing.

That won't be just fine, will it?

You make no sense.

No, you have a really bad understanding of tariffs.

We will still import some things that are tariffed but it will also make our own industry more compe ive and boost domestic industry. Still, we're not going to make EVERYYTHING on our own, so there will be tarriff revenue coming in.

I think the reason you have such a bad understanding is because you work backwards from "trump supports it so it is bad" to reasons why you think it might be bad that don't really hold water.

[ChumpDumper]

No, you have a really bad understanding of tariffs.

We will still import some things that are tariffed but it will also make our own industry more compe ive and boost domestic industry. Still, we're not going to make EVERYYTHING on our own, so there will be tarriff revenue coming in.

I think the reason you have such a bad understanding is because you work backwards from "trump supports it so it is bad" to reasons why you think it might be bad that don't really hold water.
Again, you have a really bad understanding of tariffs.

What is the deficit projected to be the next ten years?

You pretend to care about it. Post the numbers.

Show your deep understanding of the US budget.

[ChumpDumper]

Quite high. But if USA is to be this import paradise then I think taxes should be low.

Import paradise?

You're against the Trump tariffs?

[DMX7]

What is the deficit projected to be the next ten years?

You pretend to care about it. Post the numbers.

Show your deep understanding of the US budget.

Tarriff Revenue is not going to make the budget deficit worse, it will make it better. The other things in the budget are another issue.

[ChumpDumper]

Tarriff Revenue is not going to make the budget deficit worse, it will make it better. The other things in the budget are another issue.

By being a regressive sales tax!

Hooray!

Post your numbers.

Show how much you care.

[FrostKing]

Import paradise?

You're against the Trump tariffs?

I prefer USA made. Most Americans can afford to spend a little more.

Big Picture it boosts morale. People want something to believe in and support especially without religion.