Reply With Quote
Trump's war on woke is hitting cancer research hard
www.wired.com/story/how-tr...Attempting to eliminate funding for certain kinds of “woke” studies, the Trump administration erased hundreds of millions of dollars being used for cancer research.
Should we play the what's up your ass today game, Blake?
Trump's war on woke is hitting cancer research hard
www.wired.com/story/how-tr...Attempting to eliminate funding for certain kinds of “woke” studies, the Trump administration erased hundreds of millions of dollars being used for cancer research.
DEI is protected political speech, and so are "divisive concepts"
Trumplandia's war against it is pure viewpoint discrimination
https://www.mississippifreepress.org...and-inclusion/Suppressing cons utional speech through vague prohibitions and the specter of financial retribution does not serve the public good—it undermines it,” the ruling reads.
Sure, language is free speech but discrimination in the work force govt or otherwise isn't lawful. Try again dumbass.
What discrimination are you referring to? Teaching about US civil rights? Hiring qualified people who aren't white, male and straight?
another solution in search of a problem
there has never been a trans woman on any US Olympic team, despite being eligible since 2004
nyti.ms/451EUYy
A good question CD. Let me review AOC and Pelosi and Crockett policies and ill get back to you.
you don't even know
You were just given a list of names to hate.
You're stupid and anything said outside of your bubble is dismissed by you. So it's pointless even trying to argue the points. Go ask someone else to play your stupid ing games.
if you can't back up your bs or talk about your own post, so much the worse for your own argument
Another example will rear its ugly head sooner than later and I'll point it out then. I'm not much for rehashing the past by searching endlessly for an obscure rebuttal to your hysterical spamming.
I see your white flag
you'll probably surrender again, your sauce is weak
Surrender what exactly? Do you truly live for your faux internet W's? You're pathetic. I'm not going to search for obscure rebuttals because you'll be caught lying once again sooner than later and I'll point it out then. Keep spamming!
this isn't your email inbox, it's a bulletin board
if you don't like topical reposts by other posters, maybe you're wasting your time here
Maybe you should ignore me and stfu already.
pedocon theory is undefeated
Former My Faith Votes CEO Jason Yates, a prominent conservative Christian activist, has pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography, months after his arrest.
According to court do ents, Yates submitted a pe ion to enter a guilty plea on Monday with a district court in McLeod County, Minnesota.
Yates pleaded guilty to two of the eight felony counts of possession of child pornography that he had been charged with last year, in return for the dismissal of the other six counts.https://www.christianpost.com/news/j...ossession.htmlMy Faith Votes was founded in 2015 to mobilize millions of conservative Christians to vote in elections. Dr. Ben Carson, a retired pediatric neurosurgeon and conservative activist, previously served as the organization's honorary chairman.
Aside from his work with My Faith Votes, Yates also occasionally contributed syndicated op-eds to The Christian Post, with his last column being published in August 2022.
Last October, Yates was charged with eight felony counts of possession of child pornography. Each charge carries a punishment of as much as 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
According to records, a witness told authorities in July of last year that a family member of Yates "accidentally discovered" a hard drive that contained child sexual abuse material in his office.
"The contents included over 100 sexually explicit images of children," explained the district court do ent, with many of the photos on the drive believed to be of minors younger than 10.
Yates was listed as the CEO of My Faith Votes on the group's IRS Form 990 filed in 2023, with entries on the website having been published under his byline as recently as July of last year.
Sydney Sweeney
Has
Great
Genes
No ass to fill them jeans out but she sure does get obese leftist hags upset that they'll never look 1% as good as Sydney does. It's been hilarious watching the interweb of leftists crying foul over Sydney and coming up with the most ludicrous theories to back their sorry asses up for the lack of appeal for them coming from actual men.
"actual men"
The stick is clearly up yours. Not my fault you can't keep up.
Exactly, it's hard keeping up with your low iq threads abd posts. When you're not a re like you clearly are it's hard to "keep up" with a re .
yeah, but so what?
the only people I hear about this from are super online right wingers
I have yet to spot a Sydney Sweeney take in the wild
sounds like more astroturfed "cancel culture" grievance mongering to me
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
